Blue pill guy has never been through the process. He still thinks this is for life.
I'm not married because I know I'm fucked if I ever get divorced or have kids.
I just don't get so mad about everything. I see how it works and I avoid it.
If you are not angry about having your children stolen from you by the state on account of your gender, then something is wrong with you. But the comments you got upset about were not even anger. I realize that women are evil little talking monkeys just like us. They are just evil in different ways. What seems to upset you is the idea that they aren't angels.
Do you come out of the woodwork to label people angry when we criticize men? Not really. It's really only when women get criticized that suddenly certain kinds of men feel the need to wear the white armor and ride forth to defend women's honor.
Blue pill guy has never been through the process. He still thinks this is for life.
I'm not married because I know I'm fucked if I ever get divorced or have kids.
I just don't get so mad about everything. I see how it works and I avoid it.
If you are not angry about having your children stolen from you by the state on account of your gender, then something is wrong with you. But the comments you got upset about were not even anger. I realize that women are evil little talking monkeys just like us. They are just evil in different ways. What seems to upset you is the idea that they aren't angels.
Do you come out of the woodwork to label people angry when we criticize men? Not really. It's really only when women get criticized that suddenly certain kinds of men feel the need to wear the white armor and ride forth to defend women's honor.
Jesus Christ if a couple comments mean I was "upset" and white knighting?
Viktorthepirate wrote:
I'm not married because I know I'm fucked if I ever get divorced or have kids.
I just don't get so mad about everything. I see how it works and I avoid it.
If you are not angry about having your children stolen from you by the state on account of your gender, then something is wrong with you. But the comments you got upset about were not even anger. I realize that women are evil little talking monkeys just like us. They are just evil in different ways. What seems to upset you is the idea that they aren't angels.
Do you come out of the woodwork to label people angry when we criticize men? Not really. It's really only when women get criticized that suddenly certain kinds of men feel the need to wear the white armor and ride forth to defend women's honor.
Jesus Christ if a couple comments mean I was "upset" and white knighting?
I didn't really sense much of a racial/SJW tone to the article, more just straight socio-economic data about the status of marriage. If you want to correct the perceived problem, the answer is more meaningful jobs for people at all levels of society. However, that seems less and less likely to happen as we move further into the 21st Century. When they finally get driverless car and truck technology figured out, you will see a severe displacement in employment. The ramifications of that on marriage and child-rearing are difficult to predict, but likely will not be good at all, particularly on the middle areas of the country that are already suffering from poor employment opportunities.
I really don't know why we seem hell-bent on developing disruptive technologies as fast as possible. The tech industry has been pushing all this shit with very little thought on the long-term societal impacts. The country can't afford to have massive wave of unemployment of working age people in their 20's and 30's, especially men. People equate their self-worth in large part on their employment situation, and for the most part want to hold a meaningful job to provide for their families. If you take that away, you must replace it with something else and in general we haven't been very good at doing that.
If you need to ask that, then you haven't been paying attention.
Fuck off you annoying piece of shit. This thread is for discussion and not your dumbass remarks.
that's a hate crime
GrumpyCatFace wrote:Dumb slut partied too hard and woke up in a weird house. Ran out the door, weeping for her failed life choices, concerned townsfolk notes her appearance and alerted the fuzz.
Speaker to Animals wrote:It's not hate. This is how women are. We have our own bad qualities. We just don't have the state weaponized on our behalf, or armies of blue pilled women to fight for more privileges for us. That's all.
Women are doing what they can get away with.
I don't hate women either. I count myself lucky as having gotten a great wife. But I do hate what is being presented a normal and reasonable female behavior by feminists and how they have gotten the US Court System to go along with it.
Did you read the Article Viktor ? Quotes like this say a lot.
“Women say, ‘If he’s not offering money or assets, why make it legal?’ ”
Came home to homemade salisbury steak, mashed potatoes (barely touched those filthy carbs), and fresh green beans. Maybe women like this are rare, or maybe dudes just don't know there's better fish out there. As a dude though, she ain't gonna have supper waiting for you if you ain't gettin' up bright and early to get out and hump it.
GrumpyCatFace wrote:Dumb slut partied too hard and woke up in a weird house. Ran out the door, weeping for her failed life choices, concerned townsfolk notes her appearance and alerted the fuzz.
Author purposefully ignores the fact that proles have gotten married since antiquity.....Marriage = more stability = more money........but that doesn't fit in with their agenda.....anyone with half a fucking brain can see the falsehood of the article's logic...there's a fucking war out to destroy what remains of the white middle class (my guess is because that's the class most likely to challenge the power of the oligarchs)....they're no longer hiding in the shadows.....the tipping point has been reached....
that's a hate crime
