Urging Others to Suicide a Crime - Lawyers?

[Fife]

Heh, one of the things I saw her lawyers argued was that she was "involuntarily intoxicated" because of some pill she was taking. Of course she also suffers from some kind of eating disorder. Weak sauce; especially if all the judge wound up GAF about was the "assumed duty" and not the shit-talking.

Shit-talking can't be a legal theory of criminal liability, it just can't. 80% of women would instantly be on the wrong end of that deal.

[TheReal_ND]

White sharia now

[Speaker to Animals]

Heh, one of the things I saw her lawyers argued was that she was "involuntarily intoxicated" because of some pill she was taking. Of course she also suffers from some kind of eating disorder. Weak sauce; especially if all the judge wound up GAF about was the "assumed duty" and not the shit-talking.

Shit-talking can't be a legal theory of criminal liability, it just can't. 80% of women would instantly be on the wrong end of that deal.

Wait. What laws specifically do we need to get them under control?

[Hanarchy Montanarchy]

Heh, one of the things I saw her lawyers argued was that she was "involuntarily intoxicated" because of some pill she was taking. Of course she also suffers from some kind of eating disorder. Weak sauce; especially if all the judge wound up GAF about was the "assumed duty" and not the shit-talking.

Shit-talking can't be a legal theory of criminal liability, it just can't. 80% of women would instantly be on the wrong end of that deal.

Wait. What laws specifically do we need to get them under control?

None at all. Pretty sure broads get a short shrift in a lawless land.

[Speaker to Animals]

Heh, one of the things I saw her lawyers argued was that she was "involuntarily intoxicated" because of some pill she was taking. Of course she also suffers from some kind of eating disorder. Weak sauce; especially if all the judge wound up GAF about was the "assumed duty" and not the shit-talking.

Shit-talking can't be a legal theory of criminal liability, it just can't. 80% of women would instantly be on the wrong end of that deal.

Wait. What laws specifically do we need to get them under control?

None at all. Pretty sure broads get a short shrift in a lawless land.

Excellent point. So we should just let them continue destroying civilization?

[Hanarchy Montanarchy]

Wait. What laws specifically do we need to get them under control?

None at all. Pretty sure broads get a short shrift in a lawless land.

Excellent point. So we should just let them continue destroying civilization?

The circle is round, after all, innit brother.

[Speaker to Animals]

None at all. Pretty sure broads get a short shrift in a lawless land.

Excellent point. So we should just let them continue destroying civilization?

The circle is round, after all, innit brother.

Hell yeah! I need to get a motorcycle and start looking around for a barbarian tribe to join, though.

[Hanarchy Montanarchy]

Excellent point. So we should just let them continue destroying civilization?

The circle is round, after all, innit brother.

Hell yeah! I need to get a motorcycle and start looking around for a barbarian tribe to join, though.

Join? Get ahead of the curve, ground floor opportunities for outright Warlord.

Get some skulls for your chopper.

[TheReal_ND]

Plase..// halp

[brewster]

This is a tough one, the girl's obviously a raging bitch, but it seems like the only way to parse the difference between her actions and assisted suicide is legalize the suicide and regiment the layers of psych evaluations and such of the patient to protect the caregiver.