The Conceptual Penis as a Social Construct

[apeman]

I'm still not sure what I missed.

Do you honestly not get the point of the paper?

[Speaker to Animals]

I'm still not sure what I missed.

Do you honestly not get the point of the paper?

She votes too..

[K@th]

I'm still not sure what I missed.

Do you honestly not get the point of the paper?

I guess not. Tell me which part I got wrong.

Peeps created a fake paper using complete nonsense to prove that bullshit gender studies are getting published in supposedly peer reviewed journals. They got their bs published.

What am I missing? I'm truly at a loss.

[apeman]

I'm still not sure what I missed.

Do you honestly not get the point of the paper?

I guess not. Tell me which part I got wrong.

Peeps created a fake paper using complete nonsense to prove that bullshit gender studies are getting published in supposedly peer reviewed journals. They got their bs published.

What am I missing? I'm truly at a loss.

Did you learn anything from the Sokal Hoax?

[K@th]

Did you learn anything from the Sokal Hoax?

WTF?

Is everyone a troll, now?

[apeman]

I think you are trolling me.

If there was no lesson from Sokal for you, then yes, there is no lesson here either. Continue on.

[K@th]

NM. I no longer care. You're all trolling me. I understand it just fine.

[apeman]

Pretty much.

Here is the thesis for the Sokal Affair:

peer-reviewed journals would publish an article liberally salted with nonsense if (a) it sounded good and (b) it flattered the editors' ideological preconceptions

So this is a cautionary tale about the academic peer-review process.

But of course you already knew that.

Edit: Kath removed her post while I was typing this answer

[TheReal_ND]

Her post was a social construct. Like my penis.

Edit: mine is still here though

[Speaker to Animals]

If a penis is a social construct, then what is rape?