Sandy Hook Parents File 1st Argument To Supreme Court

Zlaxer
Posts: 5377
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 5:04 am

Re: Sandy Hook Parents File 1st Argument To Supreme Court

Post by Zlaxer » Mon Mar 06, 2017 6:37 am

GrumpyCatFace wrote:I agree the article is shit. Any mental patient is welcome to walk into a gun show and leave with a weapon.

Who decides what constitutes being "mentally ill"? It's a slippery slope and you know that - that's why I get pissed off....you're smart enough to know that, but shifty enough to where you play cute and don't address it.....

Btw, Adam was not capable of buying a weapon - he was declared incompetent....the mother is the primary reason those kids ended up dead...she was irresponsible in her actions......

User avatar
SuburbanFarmer
Posts: 25278
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
Location: Ohio

Re: Sandy Hook Parents File 1st Argument To Supreme Court

Post by SuburbanFarmer » Mon Mar 06, 2017 7:40 am

Zlaxer wrote:
GrumpyCatFace wrote:I agree the article is shit. Any mental patient is welcome to walk into a gun show and leave with a weapon.

Who decides what constitutes being "mentally ill"? It's a slippery slope and you know that - that's why I get pissed off....you're smart enough to know that, but shifty enough to where you play cute and don't address it.....

Btw, Adam was not capable of buying a weapon - he was declared incompetent....the mother is the primary reason those kids ended up dead...she was irresponsible in her actions......
Just figured I'd stir the pot a bit, by pointing out that any drooling retard, dangerous psychotic, or any other mentally-deficient subhuman could easily purchase a weapon of choice at a gun show. That has nothing to do with this particular case, other than the point being made that he was known to be mentally deficient at the time of the attack, and the imagined restriction that he tried to get around by joining the military. He had absolutely no need to join the military, in order to get ahold of a weapon.
They have to lie to make getting a gun seem like a trip to the grocery store.
It is exactly like a trip to the grocery store, except that the store is only in your area once or twice a year.
SJWs are a natural consequence of corporatism.

Formerly GrumpyCatFace

https://youtu.be/CYbT8-rSqo0

User avatar
clubgop
Posts: 7978
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm

Re: Sandy Hook Parents File 1st Argument To Supreme Court

Post by clubgop » Mon Mar 06, 2017 7:48 am

GrumpyCatFace wrote:
Zlaxer wrote:
GrumpyCatFace wrote:I agree the article is shit. Any mental patient is welcome to walk into a gun show and leave with a weapon.

Who decides what constitutes being "mentally ill"? It's a slippery slope and you know that - that's why I get pissed off....you're smart enough to know that, but shifty enough to where you play cute and don't address it.....

Btw, Adam was not capable of buying a weapon - he was declared incompetent....the mother is the primary reason those kids ended up dead...she was irresponsible in her actions......
Just figured I'd stir the pot a bit, by pointing out that any drooling retard, dangerous psychotic, or any other mentally-deficient subhuman could easily purchase a weapon of choice at a gun show. That has nothing to do with this particular case, other than the point being made that he was known to be mentally deficient at the time of the attack, and the imagined restriction that he tried to get around by joining the military. He had absolutely no need to join the military, in order to get ahold of a weapon.
They have to lie to make getting a gun seem like a trip to the grocery store.
It is exactly like a trip to the grocery store, except that the store is only in your area once or twice a year.
Thats a lie and you know it. Or maybe you don't and like the Dept of Education you require a shitty punchbowl and a dick slapped wife for proper instruction.

User avatar
Fife
Posts: 15157
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:47 am

Re: Sandy Hook Parents File 1st Argument To Supreme Court

Post by Fife » Mon Mar 06, 2017 7:56 am

Fuck prior restraint. And fuck those with dick-bruised old ladies who don't even understand the evil of prior restraint.

User avatar
SuburbanFarmer
Posts: 25278
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
Location: Ohio

Re: Sandy Hook Parents File 1st Argument To Supreme Court

Post by SuburbanFarmer » Mon Mar 06, 2017 8:11 am

Fife wrote:Fuck prior restraint. And fuck those with dick-bruised old ladies who don't even understand the evil of prior restraint.
I agree... but how does "prior restraint" apply here?

And why would any dick-bruising of wenches be involved? You guys are using wayyyy too much hyperbole and inside humor to keep up with.
SJWs are a natural consequence of corporatism.

Formerly GrumpyCatFace

https://youtu.be/CYbT8-rSqo0

User avatar
clubgop
Posts: 7978
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm

Re: Sandy Hook Parents File 1st Argument To Supreme Court

Post by clubgop » Mon Mar 06, 2017 8:12 am

Fife wrote:Fuck prior restraint. And fuck those with dick-bruised old ladies who don't even understand the evil of prior restraint.
Indeed.

Okeefenokee
Posts: 12950
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:27 pm
Location: The Great Place

Re: Sandy Hook Parents File 1st Argument To Supreme Court

Post by Okeefenokee » Mon Mar 06, 2017 8:14 am

GrumpyCatFace wrote:ust figured I'd stir the pot a bit, by pointing out that any drooling retard, dangerous psychotic, or any other mentally-deficient subhuman could easily purchase a weapon of choice at a gun show.
No they can't, you dishonest fuck stick.
GrumpyCatFace wrote:Dumb slut partied too hard and woke up in a weird house. Ran out the door, weeping for her failed life choices, concerned townsfolk notes her appearance and alerted the fuzz.

viewtopic.php?p=60751#p60751

User avatar
Alexander PhiAlipson
Posts: 1411
Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2017 2:29 pm

Re: Sandy Hook Parents File 1st Argument To Supreme Court

Post by Alexander PhiAlipson » Mon Mar 06, 2017 8:39 am

Okeefenokee wrote:
GrumpyCatFace wrote:ust figured I'd stir the pot a bit, by pointing out that any drooling retard, dangerous psychotic, or any other mentally-deficient subhuman could easily purchase a weapon of choice at a gun show.
No they can't, you dishonest fuck stick.
Forgive him, Okee, for he knows not what the fuck he's talking about.
:pray:
"She had yellow hair and she walked funny and she made a noise like... O my God, please don't kill me! "

User avatar
SuburbanFarmer
Posts: 25278
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
Location: Ohio

Re: Sandy Hook Parents File 1st Argument To Supreme Court

Post by SuburbanFarmer » Mon Mar 06, 2017 8:43 am

Okeefenokee wrote:
GrumpyCatFace wrote:ust figured I'd stir the pot a bit, by pointing out that any drooling retard, dangerous psychotic, or any other mentally-deficient subhuman could easily purchase a weapon of choice at a gun show.
No they can't, you dishonest fuck stick.
Explain it then. Are gun show sales subject to a background check? Do you have to wait 3 days to pick up your new weapon? Is there a screening process at the door?
SJWs are a natural consequence of corporatism.

Formerly GrumpyCatFace

https://youtu.be/CYbT8-rSqo0

User avatar
Martin Hash
Posts: 18721
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:02 pm

Re: Sandy Hook Parents File 1st Argument To Supreme Court

Post by Martin Hash » Mon Mar 06, 2017 8:55 am

I have to ask the gungrabbers: what's the death count need to be before a Right is revoked? For example, how many mentally ill people must kill before we take away their Right of Privacy, and possibly their Right to Freedom?

p.s. Since "Privacy" is a constructed Right, and statutory in nature, it goes first.
Shamedia, Shamdemic, Shamucation, Shamlection, Shamconomy & Shamate Change