Post
by jbird4049 » Fri Feb 10, 2017 3:57 pm
Dand wrote:That's great. Warren is an even nastier dingbat than Hillary. Let her be the next D nominee pls
Speaker to Animals wrote:The Conservative wrote:Speaker to Animals wrote:
Nah. When Hillary gets like that, I assume it's just the demon talking.
You mean her true self?
No. I am actually serious with this. I half suspect she is possessed.
Dand wrote:The Conservative wrote:apeman wrote:
She was censored because she is on the other team. Politics as usual.
Actually no, she broke Rule XIX.
http://www.rules.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?p=RuleXIX
This is a rule that has been around for 100 years, just because it's not enforced as much as it should be, doesn't mean what Warren did should have not been punished.
The Democrats pull our laws for copyright infringement, so what's wrong with doing this?
that was my reaction too when I read an article in the MSM about this yesterday. It kept emphasizing how this rule has not been used very often and implying that therefore the Republicans are being especially sexist and mean.
I've got another interpretation, maybe Elizabeth Warren is such a nasty bitch that she can't follow a rule if it requires her to act with some decency. If this rule is being "historically" used then it's because she managed to be a "historic" bitch. Congrats, Liz.
Dislike her politics all you want, but such name calling and deliberate obtuseness, is doing all of you no favors.
By being so deliberately insulting after a woman from the minority party is reading actual witness testimony from a black woman about a cabinet candidate's actual racism who was then stopped using a rule which is hardy ever enforced, merely enforces the suggestion that she was wrongly silenced.
Last edited by jbird4049 on Fri Feb 10, 2017 3:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.
The blood-dimmed tide is loosed, and everywhere
The ceremony of innocence is drowned;
The best lack all conviction, while the worst
Are full of passionate intensity.