Unite the Right

[Martin Hash]

"The Bell Curve" has underwent intense scrutiny & Political Correctness attacks during the decades but it has been vindicated over-n-over. IQ is real, as real as any of the Clinical Psychology bullshit can be real anyway.

[Speaker to Animals]

Oh wow. 100 people? Amazing. Too bad they can't run him out of town like they did to James Watson, amiright!? What the fuck does that racist James Watson know about evolution anyway!

[TheReal_ND]

f my grave is the fact that my kids have a brown tint to their skin it's a lil late.

Tell us how that feels and why you feel you are entitled to shut down people that do not like that. Does your kiddos look like you? Is the father still there?

Tell us the truth MDJ; are you raising them?

Am I raising who? My kids are adults. Why are you asking about my husband (their father)? If you're concerned, he is still 'here' as in 'among the living,' and he's been here as in 'living with me' for over 30 years.

So he's black right? That would explain a lot actually. I'm assuming your white husband couldn't cut it for you amirite?

[Hanarchy Montanarchy]

ehem,

Wade replied: "I make no such statement. To the contrary, my book explicitly takes no position on the cause of racial differences in I.Q. results, given the difficulty of assessing the many factors other than genetics that heavily influence I.Q. scores. I find it hard to see how any reader of the book could have missed this point, and can only assume that the organizers of the biologists' letter induced many signatories to condemn a book they had not read."

Yes, I left that in.

He thinks they didn't read his book because they don't know how circumspect he is about the conclusions one can draw.

Also, he does assume they didn't read it.

The point is, Troublesome Inheritance is not established scientific fact from a scientist the way Speaker presents it. It's conclusions are debated by the scientists upon whose research it rests.

[Okeefenokee]

Show me an interpretation of data that isn't debated.

[MilSpecs]

Tell us how that feels and why you feel you are entitled to shut down people that do not like that. Does your kiddos look like you? Is the father still there?

Tell us the truth MDJ; are you raising them?

Am I raising who? My kids are adults. Why are you asking about my husband (their father)? If you're concerned, he is still 'here' as in 'among the living,' and he's been here as in 'living with me' for over 30 years.

So he's black right? That would explain a lot actually. I'm assuming your white husband couldn't cut it for you amirite?

Child, he's 6'2" and well built.

[TheReal_ND]

ehem,

Wade replied: "I make no such statement. To the contrary, my book explicitly takes no position on the cause of racial differences in I.Q. results, given the difficulty of assessing the many factors other than genetics that heavily influence I.Q. scores. I find it hard to see how any reader of the book could have missed this point, and can only assume that the organizers of the biologists' letter induced many signatories to condemn a book they had not read."

Yes, I left that in.

He thinks they didn't read his book because they don't know how circumspect he is about the conclusions one can draw.

Also, he does assume they didn't read it.

The point is, Troublesome Inheritance is not established scientific fact from a scientist the way Speaker presents it. It's conclusions are debated by the scientists upon whose research it rests.

Neither is 'Bowling Alone' but that doesn't stop disenfranchised young whites from turning to the "Altistic-Right."

Quite frankly, what have you proposed? Nothing. A complete embrasure of nothing. It's really no wonder your side is losing.

[Hanarchy Montanarchy]

Oh wow. 100 people? Amazing. Too bad they can't run him out of town like they did to James Watson, amiright!? What the fuck does that racist James Watson know about evolution anyway!

A hundred scientists in the field Wade (who isn't a scientist in said field) is talking about.

The fact is, you have drawn your own conclusions from some popular science books that confirm some grand, moral/historical arc that you are attracted to, and you present your own conclusions as settled science.

Email Murray, or Wade for that matter, and run this whole "only whites can civilization bro" theory by them and see what they think.

[Speaker to Animals]

Oh wow. 100 people? Amazing. Too bad they can't run him out of town like they did to James Watson, amiright!? What the fuck does that racist James Watson know about evolution anyway!

A hundred scientists in the field Wade (who isn't a scientist in said field) is talking about.

The fact is, you have drawn your own conclusions from some popular science books that confirm some grand, moral/historical arc that you are attracted to, and you present your own conclusions as settled science.

Email Murray, or Wade for that matter, and run this whole "only whites can civilization bro" theory by them and see what they think.

How about the guy who discovered DNA? He had to sell off his noble price to feed himself after what happened. Don't tell me about how many people support this marxist nonsense when the consequences for dissenting from it were made quite clear. Also 100 people. LOL. That's hardly anybody.

[TheReal_ND]

Oh wow. 100 people? Amazing. Too bad they can't run him out of town like they did to James Watson, amiright!? What the fuck does that racist James Watson know about evolution anyway!

A hundred scientists in the field Wade (who isn't a scientist in said field) is talking about.

The fact is, you have drawn your own conclusions from some popular science books that confirm some grand, moral/historical arc that you are attracted to, and you present your own conclusions as settled science.

Email Murray, or Wade for that matter, and run this whole "only whites can civilization bro" theory by them and see what they think.

Like, these books don't align with what I believe