Fake News

[The Conservative]

And for those who think I'm being hard, good. Just remember one thing, I may be autistic, but I also know when I'm being made fun of, and I also know when I am being insulted. Don't ever expect me to take either laying down, especially when you mean it.

I'm off this topic because asshole here will never accept he has been out trolled.

[pineapplemike]

[Speaker to Animals]

No, I mean the spam. Fuck off, TC.

[pineapplemike]

corporate press is enemy of the spam people

[Speaker to Animals]

Great analysis on "why Kamala Harris hasn't caught fire".

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles ... -2020-race

Run a word search for anything to do with Tulsi Gabbard in that article.

Fucking ridiculous.

[Montegriffo]

Great analysis on "why Kamala Harris hasn't caught fire".

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles ... -2020-race

Run a word search for anything to do with Tulsi Gabbard in that article.

Fucking ridiculous.

Maybe because Tulsi Chamberlain is no longer relevant.

[Speaker to Animals]

Great analysis on "why Kamala Harris hasn't caught fire".

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles ... -2020-race

Run a word search for anything to do with Tulsi Gabbard in that article.

Fucking ridiculous.

Maybe because Tulsi Chamberlain is no longer relevant.

She is 100% relevant as to why Kamala Harris went down in flames. The article was supposed to explain why Harris failed, and yet they decided to not even mention Gabbard where it was relevant.

This is total propaganda and fake news.

[Montegriffo]

Maybe because Tulsi Chamberlain is no longer relevant.

She is 100% relevant as to why Kamala Harris went down in flames. The article was supposed to explain why Harris failed, and yet they decided to not even mention Gabbard where it was relevant.

This is total propaganda and fake news.

Maybe Tulsi the appeaser was not as major a contribution to Harris's failure as you believe?
She does not carry the weight of other candidates who criticised her such as Biden.

[Speaker to Animals]

Maybe because Tulsi Chamberlain is no longer relevant.

She is 100% relevant as to why Kamala Harris went down in flames. The article was supposed to explain why Harris failed, and yet they decided to not even mention Gabbard where it was relevant.

This is total propaganda and fake news.

Maybe Tulsi the appeaser was not as major a contribution to Harris's failure as you believe?
She does not carry the weight of other candidates who criticised her such as Biden.

It isn't belief. Demonstrable fact. Harris imploded after Tulsi destroyed her on national television.

Harris was on the rise until this very moment:




Harris was destroyed for all time after that. She's never coming back.

[Speaker to Animals]

This is the truth:

Sen. Kamala Harris (D-Calif.) saw her support drop significantly in one of the first polls taken after the second round of Democratic presidential debates.

Harris, 54, repeatedly clashed with Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (D-Hawaii), who attacked Harris over her record as a prosecutor.

The Quinnipiac University poll released Aug. 6, a week after the debate, showed support for Harris dropping from 12 percent in a July poll to 7 percent. Support for Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) increased from 15 percent to 21 percent, making her second place behind former Vice President Joe Biden, who got 32 percent support among Democrats and independent voters who lean Democrat.

https://www.theepochtimes.com/support-f ... 33310.html


Harris totally imploded after Tulsi essentially shot her in the face, politically, on live television. That was it. Her entire political career went down in flames right there.

But Bloomberg doesn't want to admit it.