They should nominate a nudist. Really just embrace the poz.
2020 election
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: 2020 election
There is no Trump in the 2020 Dem Primaries dumbass. You counting on there being one is why you keep putting your foot in your mouth.
*yip*
-
- Posts: 15157
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:47 am
Re: 2020 election
Poor Hillary was just another hoe fucked by John Edwards.
:goteam: :drunk:
:goteam: :drunk:
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: 2020 election
There is no Obama either. This is why your analysis is garbage, the only examples you can point to, are infinitely more skilled campaigners than anyone in 2020 Democrat field, and neither of your examples ran against an incumbent POTUS with a booming economy either. Trump and Obama would have picked another year to run for POTUS if there was incumbent with a booming economy, because ain't no point blowing up your political capital to run into that buzzsaw and potentially lose.
The only two candidates to unseat a sitting POTUS since they changed the primary system, were two-term presidents who ran against an incumbent with the economy in the trash. Ain't no one of that caliber in the 2020 Dem Primaries dude, be real.
Last edited by StCapps on Tue Jul 30, 2019 8:20 am, edited 1 time in total.
*yip*
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: 2020 election
So, in other words, you are saying this time is different because there will be no winner. Sound legit.
Or.. just maybe.. the winner of this nomination will seem obvious to you in hindsight, and next time around you will play the same silly game you play now, and that you played in 2016, without ever learning a damned thing.
Or.. just maybe.. the winner of this nomination will seem obvious to you in hindsight, and next time around you will play the same silly game you play now, and that you played in 2016, without ever learning a damned thing.
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: 2020 election
You always cherry pick examples who ran in a year with no incumbent, who are higher caliber than anyone in Dem 2020 field, why is that?Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Tue Jul 30, 2019 8:19 amSo, in other words, you are saying this time is different because there will be no winner. Sound legit.
Or.. just maybe.. the winner of this nomination will seem obvious to you in hindsight, and next time around you will play the same silly game you play now, and that you played in 2016, without ever learning a damned thing.
Is it because all the other examples don't point to your desired outcome, show a likely Biden victory and you need to rely on obvious exceptional outliers to prove your projection is possible, even when none of these exceptional outliers actually exist in the 2020 Dem primaries?
You didn't learn a damn thing from 2016, because you think Trump's grow on trees and anyone who plays the outsider can beat any establishment candidate, even when only exceptional politicians have accomplished that, you think it's the message and not the messenger, but it's the messenger and not the message.
Last edited by StCapps on Tue Jul 30, 2019 8:26 am, edited 1 time in total.
*yip*
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: 2020 election
All the cherries have been picked. There's nothing left. False analogy.