BREAKING NEWS

[SuburbanFarmer]

Apparently, we’re playing traffic jam with the Russians to steal oil now. So that’s still a thing.

https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/ ... -us-convoy

[Zlaxer]

Apparently, we’re playing traffic jam with the Russians to steal oil now. So that’s still a thing.

https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/ ... -us-convoy

Russia would get smoked in a non-nuke conflict with the US and they know it, everyone knows it...Big Daddy Putin knows it...not sure wtf we’re doing in Syria though except securing profits for MIC...

[SuburbanFarmer]

Apparently, we’re playing traffic jam with the Russians to steal oil now. So that’s still a thing.

https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/ ... -us-convoy

Russia would get smoked in a non-nuke conflict with the US and they know it, everyone knows it...Big Daddy Putin knows it...not sure wtf we’re doing in Syria though except securing profits for MIC...

Playing chicken with the end of the world, apparently.

[Xenophon]

Apparently, we’re playing traffic jam with the Russians to steal oil now. So that’s still a thing.

https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/ ... -us-convoy

Russia would get smoked in a non-nuke conflict with the US and they know it, everyone knows it...Big Daddy Putin knows it...not sure wtf we’re doing in Syria though except securing profits for MIC...

Playing chicken with the end of the world, apparently.

A nuclear exchange with Russia is not an end of the world event. The objective wouldn't be to just fling all the nukes at once. The objective would be to hit the enemy's counterforce so they couldn't launch a retaliatory strike at your own nuke capabilities. Population centers wouldn't advance any strategic aims.

Also, modern tactical nukes would not be city killers. MAD is fake and gay.

[Zlaxer]

Russia would get smoked in a non-nuke conflict with the US and they know it, everyone knows it...Big Daddy Putin knows it...not sure wtf we’re doing in Syria though except securing profits for MIC...

Playing chicken with the end of the world, apparently.

A nuclear exchange with Russia is not an end of the world event. The objective wouldn't be to just fling all the nukes at once. The objective would be to hit the enemy's counterforce so they couldn't launch a retaliatory strike at your own nuke capabilities. Population centers wouldn't advance any strategic aims.

Also, modern tactical nukes would not be city killers. MAD is fake and gay.

Russia didn’t choose the same design path for nukes as we did...

[SuburbanFarmer]

Russia would get smoked in a non-nuke conflict with the US and they know it, everyone knows it...Big Daddy Putin knows it...not sure wtf we’re doing in Syria though except securing profits for MIC...

Playing chicken with the end of the world, apparently.

A nuclear exchange with Russia is not an end of the world event. The objective wouldn't be to just fling all the nukes at once. The objective would be to hit the enemy's counterforce so they couldn't launch a retaliatory strike at your own nuke capabilities. Population centers wouldn't advance any strategic aims.

Also, modern tactical nukes would not be city killers. MAD is fake and gay.

That should be a comfort when I'm starving to death and riddled with tumors.

[The Conservative]

Playing chicken with the end of the world, apparently.

A nuclear exchange with Russia is not an end of the world event. The objective wouldn't be to just fling all the nukes at once. The objective would be to hit the enemy's counterforce so they couldn't launch a retaliatory strike at your own nuke capabilities. Population centers wouldn't advance any strategic aims.

Also, modern tactical nukes would not be city killers. MAD is fake and gay.

That should be a comfort when I'm starving to death and riddled with tumors.

Don't worry you'll be dead well before hunger and tumors kick in.

[SuburbanFarmer]

Elon set to demo his new brain implants at 7pm EST.

[The Conservative]

https://www.sfexaminer.com/news/wiener- ... stry-laws/

A new state bill introduced by Sen. Scott Wiener, D-San Francisco, could possibly change the way young offenders, specifically those who identify as LGBT, are put on the state’s sex offender registry list, Wiener’s office announced Tuesday.

Currently, while consensual sex between 15- to 17-year-olds and a partner within 10 years of age is illegal, vaginal intercourse between the two does not require an offender to register as a sex offender. Other forms of intercourse such as oral and anal intercourse require sex offender registration.

That practice, according to Wiener, disproportionately targets young LGBT people, who usually cannot engage in vaginal intercourse.

Senate Bill 145 would put an end to “blatant discrimination against young LGBT people engaged in consensual activity,” Wiener said in a statement.

[PartyOf5]

Monty's moving to CA!