Social Justice Warriors Thread

[C-Mag]

I just traveled through the PRP for work. I gave my buddy there shit when I went through security and had a Gender Bender dude checking IDs and a Hajji screening bags, the best agent they had was a cute blonde that was in good shape, thorough and good customer relations.

[Calculus Man]

Any of you guys see this yet?

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/10 ... ng-tinder/

Apparently, men are now required to keep track of which body parts we have permission to touch during sex.

Sounds like fun, right?

[The Conservative]

Any of you guys see this yet?

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/10 ... ng-tinder/

Apparently, men are now required to keep track of which body parts we have permission to touch during sex.

Sounds like fun, right?

Seriously? This is old news in Mass, here are some twisted law attempt/examples.

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/03/ ... 23343.html
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/smartert ... 79145.html
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/sex/11 ... -sign.html
http://duhprogressive.com/index.php/470 ... during-sex

[BjornP]

Any of you guys see this yet?

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/10 ... ng-tinder/

Apparently, men are now required to keep track of which body parts we have permission to touch during sex.

Sounds like fun, right?

Consentual sex is usually more fun that the non-consenting sort. If a woman, for whatever reason, upon you touching her breasts the first time during sex, says: "I don't like my breasts getting touched, so stop touching them", you either:

A: Stop having sex with her because you find that request unreasonable.

B: Continue having sex with her while avoiding touching her breasts.

Ain't a SJW'y story. It's basic, common decency to have some respect for the person you're having sex with.

[Calculus Man]

Consentual sex is usually more fun that the non-consenting sort.

I'll have to take your word for that, having only had the first type.

If a woman, for whatever reason, upon you touching her breasts the first time during sex, says: "I don't like my breasts getting touched, so stop touching them", you either:

A: Stop having sex with her because you find that request unreasonable.

B: Continue having sex with her while avoiding touching her breasts.

Ain't a SJW'y story. It's basic, common decency to have some respect for the person you're having sex with.

Disrespect =/= sexual assault, Bjorn. That's what makes it SJW.

Did this guy deserve to have his life ruined? How could he possibly prove his innocence?

Is it respectful to report any awkward sexual situations to the authorities, thereby ruining a man's life? Of course not. But in SJW land, sexual respect only flows one way.

[Okeefenokee]

Take that, tinder fag.

[BjornP]

Consentual sex is usually more fun that the non-consenting sort.

I'll have to take your word for that, having only had the first type.

Disrespect =/= sexual assault, Bjorn. That's what makes it SJW.

Did this guy deserve to have his life ruined? How could he possibly prove his innocence?

Is it respectful to report any awkward sexual situations to the authorities, thereby ruining a man's life? Of course not. But in SJW land, sexual respect only flows one way.

You're right, disrespect does not equal sexual assault. Lack of consent does. If your partner consents to sex, but two minutes in decides she doesn't want to continue with it, or only wants to do oral instead that's a withdrawal of consent, and you either stop having sex with her altogether or you agree to her new request. That's what consent means. It's more than "awkward sex".

As for how one can prove or disprove guilt in cases like that? Evaluation of witness testimony is almost always the only sort of proof that can exist. Although, it seems she did sustain bruising. Can cases with only testimonies lead to miscarriage of justice if the accuser is lying? Yes. The alternative is letting any sexual crime against men, women and children go unpunished unless there's either video or forenisic evidence to charge them.

And given what he got convicted for, then of course he deserved having "his life ruined", as you choose to call it. Not that anyone but himself "ruined his life" for him.

[apeman]

How can there be consent to sex but not to touching boobs?

Seriously, I bet if you have consent that you'll get blown, but then you cum on her face without warning, you are guilty of sexual assault in the UK.

[BjornP]

How can there be consent to sex but not to touching boobs?

Seriously, I bet if you have consent that you'll get blown, but then you cum on her face without warning, you are guilty of sexual assault in the UK.

By the other party vocalizing she didn't want her boobs touched?

[apeman]

How can there be consent to sex but not to touching boobs?

Seriously, I bet if you have consent that you'll get blown, but then you cum on her face without warning, you are guilty of sexual assault in the UK.

By the other party vocalizing she didn't want her boobs touched?

I just literally cannot conceive of this outcome. If I was asked has a woman ever given consent to sex but not to touching boobs, I would have said of course not.

I mean, as time goes on it takes more and more to surprise me, but this did it.