So, once it becomes someone on your political side its not allowed? Your political side has been pushing this kind of thing for years now.TheReal_ND wrote: ↑Sun Jun 24, 2018 8:29 pmNo. You arent allowed to deny services to people marginalized politically or otherwise. If you have a gay cake you must sell it to the gay "couple." Otherwise its straight back to marginalizing niggers etc.Penner wrote: ↑Sun Jun 24, 2018 8:18 pmIf I remember correctly, you are the ones who are saying that private businesses can refuse to serve people. So, these are private business refusing to serve members of the Trump administration.Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Sun Jun 24, 2018 8:13 pm
Nobody has done that until you guys did it. Bakers were not refusing to bake cakes for gay people. They were refusing to bake specific cakes for sacrilegious events. Don't try to conflate our refusing to participate in an immoral act with your wanting to act like fucking cunts.
You guys are total cunts, by the way. If you think this is okay, or it will end well, then you really do deserve the world of shit you have coming if you continue to escalate your hostilities against the rest of the American people.
If you are an artisan and being forced to craft something for something you find marginalizing then we have a Supreme Court Case for you.
THE ERA OF TRUMP
-
- Posts: 3350
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:00 pm
Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP
-
- Posts: 12950
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:27 pm
- Location: The Great Place
Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP
You notice no one here said anything about what's allowed except you?
GrumpyCatFace wrote:Dumb slut partied too hard and woke up in a weird house. Ran out the door, weeping for her failed life choices, concerned townsfolk notes her appearance and alerted the fuzz.
viewtopic.php?p=60751#p60751
-
- Posts: 26035
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:23 pm
Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP
No one is forcing your hand. Discrimination of service is what was ruled. The Baker fucked up by having cakes for sale.Penner wrote: ↑Sun Jun 24, 2018 8:35 pmSo, once it becomes someone on your political side its not allowed? Your political side has been pushing this kind of thing for years now.TheReal_ND wrote: ↑Sun Jun 24, 2018 8:29 pmNo. You arent allowed to deny services to people marginalized politically or otherwise. If you have a gay cake you must sell it to the gay "couple." Otherwise its straight back to marginalizing niggers etc.
If you are an artisan and being forced to craft something for something you find marginalizing then we have a Supreme Court Case for you.
-
- Posts: 26035
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:23 pm
Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP
Cake is also ceremonial. It's very hard to make a religious case out of post modern ceremony in all modern contexts.
I'm not saying I liked the ruling but to rule otherwise would pretty much buck the entire system. Would be cool tho
I'm not saying I liked the ruling but to rule otherwise would pretty much buck the entire system. Would be cool tho
-
- Posts: 3350
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:00 pm
Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP
Don't have to go to restaurants either. People can just make food from home if they like it.
-
- Posts: 12950
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:27 pm
- Location: The Great Place
Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP
I really hope they don't keep doing this. It would really hurt republicans in the midterms if the left made a habit out of showing what hypocrites they are.
GrumpyCatFace wrote:Dumb slut partied too hard and woke up in a weird house. Ran out the door, weeping for her failed life choices, concerned townsfolk notes her appearance and alerted the fuzz.
viewtopic.php?p=60751#p60751
-
- Posts: 28265
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm
Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP
Trump owns the high ground on Immigration, and the lefties work their ass off to make immigration the issue of the mid terms
PLATA O PLOMO
Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience
Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience
-
- Posts: 14775
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am
Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP
The baker said he would make them any kind of cake except a wedding cake due to religious beliefs.
The restaurant had no such moral or ethic high grounds to stand upon.
The restaurant had no such moral or ethic high grounds to stand upon.
#NotOneRedCent
-
- Posts: 25256
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP
That wasn’t the argument used, was it.The Conservative wrote: ↑Sun Jun 24, 2018 10:17 pmThe baker said he would make them any kind of cake except a wedding cake due to religious beliefs.
The restaurant had no such moral or ethic high grounds to stand upon.
It was about property rights and forcing people to do things they don’t want to.
Well this is the flip side of that.
-
- Posts: 14775
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am
Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP
Actually, it was the argument used, and the reason that the SCOTUS used to see in the favor of the baker.SuburbanFarmer wrote: ↑Sun Jun 24, 2018 11:12 pmThat wasn’t the argument used, was it.The Conservative wrote: ↑Sun Jun 24, 2018 10:17 pmThe baker said he would make them any kind of cake except a wedding cake due to religious beliefs.
The restaurant had no such moral or ethic high grounds to stand upon.
It was about property rights and forcing people to do things they don’t want to.
Well this is the flip side of that.
http://www.scotusblog.com/2018/06/opini ... cake-case/
The opinion seemed to leave open the possibility that, in a future case, a service provider’s sincere religious beliefs might have to yield to the state’s interest in protecting the rights of same-sex couples
#NotOneRedCent