Social Justice Warriors Thread

[Hanarchy Montanarchy]

Who has ever suggested that everybody is the same?

Well, there was this short period where people thought that's how we should treat one another, but then came the marxists to set us straight. So, that's the reality now. Marxists convinced half the country that we don't have to do that anymore, and now there's a whirlwind out on the horizon that's just begging to be reaped. Have fun.

If varying reactions to dairy convinced you, then the Marxists didn't have to work very fuckin' hard, did they?

[BjornP]

Holy shit, anti-science on display.

Black Africans evolved a defense against malaria. The side effect of this genetic adaptation was that, if you got two copies of the gene, you were setup for sickle cell anemia. If you have only one copy, then you are highly resistant to catching malaria.

It's Sub-Saharan Africans who evolved this trait after our ancestors left Africa and *before* the age of the slave trade.

It's literally a racial marker.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sickle-ce ... e#Genetics

So, not all of SS-Africa (East and Southern tip), and additionally also parts of the ME, Indian subcontinent, Anatolia and Southeast Europe.

Meaning if you want to speak of a "race defined by genetic malaria resistence" that race isn't simply going to be Sub-Saharan Black Africans. So, is this gene enough to make someone descended from anyone from the relevant parts of Africa, ME, Anatolia, SE Europe or India, part of a sub-category of homo sapiens sapiens? Like a homo sapiens sapiens antimosquitoiensisis or something?

The trouble with using wiki,

The allele responsible for sickle-cell anaemia can be found on the short arm of chromosome 11, more specifically 11p15.5. A person who receives the defective gene from both father and mother develops the disease; a person who receives one defective and one healthy allele remains healthy, but can pass on the disease and is known as a carrier or heterozygote. Heterozygotes are still able to contract malaria, but their symptoms are generally less severe.

People carrying the gene from one parent do not carry a disease. It's a genetic resistance, not a disease. Inheriting the gene from both parents causes a condition.

A comparative survey of couples suggests people are more attracted to those who have very different immunity genes from their own, even though they are not aware of it.

The genes in question play a major role in the immune system's ability to fight infections, but they are also thought to leave a lingering trace in the scent of people's body odour.
https://www.theguardian.com/science/200 ... attraction

The haemoglobin gene doesn't affect every population equally. In some, the haemoglobin gene works as intended. In those that fuck indiscriminately, you get SCA. This horseshit you're pedaling is no different than the garbage idea that HIV affects all populations equally.

I am peddling that we are all genetically the same or that diseases all affect us the same? Funny how one can "peddle" something without saying, implying, alluding to, believing in or writing that something, isn't it? Would be even funnier if you could point to where I've written anything resembling that.

StA can pretend he is laughing as hysterically as he likes and rock himself to sleep to the chant of "Marxists!", but nothing changes the fact that human biological races is something most scientists in the field reject, as the links I provided attest. He, otoh, has referenced a pop sci book refuted by a majority of modern scientists specializing in human genetics.

[Ex-California]

[Kazmyr]

What in the actual fuck is that thing? (Besides a filthy commie).

It's like someone grafted Christine Ebersole's face on some beta millenial's body and topped it with Andy Warhol hair and sprinkled it with retardation and communism.

[Alexander PhiAlipson]

What in the actual fuck is that thing? (Besides a filthy commie).

It's like someone grafted Christine Ebersole's face on some beta millenial's body and topped it with Andy Warhol hair and sprinkled it with retardation and communism.

It kinda looks like something you'd see in a cheesy sci-fi flick pasted to a wall mouthing the words kill me, kill me!

[Kazmyr]

What in the actual fuck is that thing? (Besides a filthy commie).

It's like someone grafted Christine Ebersole's face on some beta millenial's body and topped it with Andy Warhol hair and sprinkled it with retardation and communism.

It kinda looks like something you'd see in a cheesy sci-fi flick pasted to a wall mouthing the words kill me, kill me!

In that case, rally the townsfolk with torches and pitchforks!

[Speaker to Animals]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sickle-ce ... e#Genetics

So, not all of SS-Africa (East and Southern tip), and additionally also parts of the ME, Indian subcontinent, Anatolia and Southeast Europe.

Meaning if you want to speak of a "race defined by genetic malaria resistence" that race isn't simply going to be Sub-Saharan Black Africans. So, is this gene enough to make someone descended from anyone from the relevant parts of Africa, ME, Anatolia, SE Europe or India, part of a sub-category of homo sapiens sapiens? Like a homo sapiens sapiens antimosquitoiensisis or something?

The trouble with using wiki,

The allele responsible for sickle-cell anaemia can be found on the short arm of chromosome 11, more specifically 11p15.5. A person who receives the defective gene from both father and mother develops the disease; a person who receives one defective and one healthy allele remains healthy, but can pass on the disease and is known as a carrier or heterozygote. Heterozygotes are still able to contract malaria, but their symptoms are generally less severe.

People carrying the gene from one parent do not carry a disease. It's a genetic resistance, not a disease. Inheriting the gene from both parents causes a condition.

A comparative survey of couples suggests people are more attracted to those who have very different immunity genes from their own, even though they are not aware of it.

The genes in question play a major role in the immune system's ability to fight infections, but they are also thought to leave a lingering trace in the scent of people's body odour.
https://www.theguardian.com/science/200 ... attraction

The haemoglobin gene doesn't affect every population equally. In some, the haemoglobin gene works as intended. In those that fuck indiscriminately, you get SCA. This horseshit you're pedaling is no different than the garbage idea that HIV affects all populations equally.

I am peddling that we are all genetically the same or that diseases all affect us the same? Funny how one can "peddle" something without saying, implying, alluding to, believing in or writing that something, isn't it? Would be even funnier if you could point to where I've written anything resembling that.

StA can pretend he is laughing as hysterically as he likes and rock himself to sleep to the chant of "Marxists!", but nothing changes the fact that human biological races is something most scientists in the field reject, as the links I provided attest. He, otoh, has referenced a pop sci book refuted by a majority of modern scientists specializing in human genetics.

[Speaker to Animals]

I wonder if anybody told it that the Soviets imprisoned or exterminated homosexuals.

[TheReal_ND]

Someone bring me up to speed on what bjorn is peddling

[Montegriffo]

What in the actual fuck is that thing? (Besides a filthy commie).

It's like someone grafted Christine Ebersole's face on some beta millenial's body and topped it with Andy Warhol hair and sprinkled it with retardation and communism.

I hope he forced a baker to make that cake for him.