BREAKING NEWS

[The Conservative]

Some perspective

As I said, this was a detonation size of a small nuke, actually a 1 Megaton Nuke. Airburst, if it was ground it would be 3.3 Megatons.

file.jpg

Manila.png

Beirut.png

[Hastur]

When building a fertilizer bomb there is a big difference between one that is mixed with the right amount of diesel and packed tight, and a bunch of fertilizer just laying on a floor. Makes a huge difference. I bet most of the ammonium nitrate just blew away.

[The Conservative]

When building a fertilizer bomb there is a big difference between one that is mixed with the right amount of diesel and packed tight, and a bunch of fertilizer just laying on a floor. Makes a huge difference. I bet most of the ammonium nitrate just blew away.

93% of it?

[Hastur]

When building a fertilizer bomb there is a big difference between one that is mixed with the right amount of diesel and packed tight, and a bunch of fertilizer just laying on a floor. Makes a huge difference. I bet most of the ammonium nitrate just blew away.

93% of it?

Don't know where you get your numbers. As I said here: https://www.martinhash.com/forums/viewt ... 10#p321161

To simmulate a 1 kilotonne nuclear blast you need 0.5 kilotonne of TNT. Half the energy in a nuclear bomb generates light and other radiation.

The Relative Effectiveness factor of ammonium nitrate is 0.32.

2,750 tons of AN = 2,750 * 0,32 * 2 = 1,76 kilotonne Nuke.

And that is if you have it packed into a Sphere.

[Xenophon]

https://twitter.com/anoninTexas/status/ ... 0746163201

Excerpt from the President's speech. Weird.

[The Conservative]

When building a fertilizer bomb there is a big difference between one that is mixed with the right amount of diesel and packed tight, and a bunch of fertilizer just laying on a floor. Makes a huge difference. I bet most of the ammonium nitrate just blew away.

93% of it?

Don't know where you get your numbers. As I said here: https://www.martinhash.com/forums/viewt ... 10#p321161

To simmulate a 1 kilotonne nuclear blast you need 0.5 kilotonne of TNT. Half the energy in a nuclear bomb generates light and other radiation.

The Relative Effectiveness factor of ammonium nitrate is 0.32.

2,750 tons of AN = 2,750 * 0,32 * 2 = 1,76 kilotonne Nuke.

And that is if you have it packed into a Sphere.

Yes, and I know exactly where you got that statistics from...

Your math is accurate, but as I stated, the images I showed were of a 1MT, not Kilotonne. It was 1,000 Kilotonnes...

Also, my math comes from the Oklahoma City Bombing, the reported blast radius was said to be felt 155 miles away... that was three times the distance as the Oklahoma City Bombing's range, and it only used 1 Ton of Amonnia Nitrate...

So, to expodentially increase the damage by three... what do you need to do?

[Hastur]

93% of it?

Don't know where you get your numbers. As I said here: https://www.martinhash.com/forums/viewt ... 10#p321161

To simmulate a 1 kilotonne nuclear blast you need 0.5 kilotonne of TNT. Half the energy in a nuclear bomb generates light and other radiation.

The Relative Effectiveness factor of ammonium nitrate is 0.32.

2,750 tons of AN = 2,750 * 0,32 * 2 = 1,76 kilotonne Nuke.

And that is if you have it packed into a Sphere.

Yes, and I know exactly where you got that statistics from...

Your math is accurate, but as I stated, the images I showed were of a 1MT, not Kilotonne. It was 1,000 Kilotonnes...

Also, my math comes from the Oklahoma City Bombing, the reported blast radius was said to be felt 155 miles away... that was three times the distance as the Oklahoma City Bombing's range, and it only used 1 Ton of Amonnia Nitrate...

So, to expodentially increase the damage by three... what do you need to do?

I don't think the felt blast distance can be supposed to be linearly dependent on the blast size. The blast expands in 3 dimensions so to be felt three times as far it would have to be a lot more than 3 times bigger. The local geography also plays in as does the fact that the oklahoma bomb was up towards a building. I assume it was increased in one direction and deceased in the other.
Same thing in Beirut with that Silo to some extent but that seems to have been placed in paralell to the blast as seen from inland.

[The Conservative]

Don't know where you get your numbers. As I said here: https://www.martinhash.com/forums/viewt ... 10#p321161

Yes, and I know exactly where you got that statistics from...

Your math is accurate, but as I stated, the images I showed were of a 1MT, not Kilotonne. It was 1,000 Kilotonnes...

Also, my math comes from the Oklahoma City Bombing, the reported blast radius was said to be felt 155 miles away... that was three times the distance as the Oklahoma City Bombing's range, and it only used 1 Ton of Amonnia Nitrate...

So, to exponentially increase the damage by three... what do you need to do?

I don't think the felt blast distance can be supposed to be linearly dependent on the blast size. The blast expands in 3 dimensions so to be felt three times as far it would have to be a lot more than 3 times bigger. The local geography also plays in as does the fact that the oklahoma bomb was up towards a building. I assume it was increased in one direction and deceased in the other.
Same thing in Beirut with that Silo to some extent but that seems to have been placed in paralell to the blast as seen from inland.

The silos were not where the explosion came from... I am really wondering how much more people can lie to themselves....

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=abM7M40x2RA

So you are telling me the building in front of the silo was holding 2700 metric tons of Ammonia Nitrite? I'm sorry, but this was not an Ammonia Nitrite explosion. I've already said that if it was land-based it would take a 3.3 MT explosion to reach as far as they said it did. Far beyond what 2.7k metric tons on Ammonia Nitrate can produce. at a 1 PSI shockwave)

And the Oklahoma City Bombing did more damage to the structure next to it with 1 Ton of Ammonia Nitrite. That Silo system looks like it will need to be torn down, but its outer shell is mostly standing.

This entire situation does not make mathematical or other sense.

[Zlaxer]

https://www.breitbart.com/immigration/2 ... -migrants/


Good luck in the job market - you fucking proles.....

[Zlaxer]

Obviously the elites are correct that only innovative people who start their own companies should earn above $50K/yr....the rest of the population are just leaches and temp workers....

Done by a DNC made man no less....