THE ERA OF TRUMP

[SuburbanFarmer]

It's actually a marker for cognitive dissonance.

So, questioning the new decree must mean that I’m a crazy person? That’s where you’re going with this?

[Speaker to Animals]

Trump is losing this PR fight. Blaming the democrats works in all sorts of situations, but it's not flying here.


Trump losing GOP and media allies in outcry over separating immigrant families

Andrew Napolitano calls it child abuse; Murdoch is publishing negative OpEds on this, Melania not happy and the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops no likey-like.

I see. So the neocohens and lolbergs joined ranks with their progressive allies to demand open borders and more white genocide. Surprising.

[Okeefenokee]

Trump is losing this PR fight. Blaming the democrats works in all sorts of situations, but it's not flying here.


Trump losing GOP and media allies in outcry over separating immigrant families

Andrew Napolitano calls it child abuse; Murdoch is publishing negative OpEds on this, Melania not happy and the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops no likey-like.

I guess congress should do something about their immigration laws then, huh?

[Zlaxer]

MAGA

https://www.wsj.com/articles/donald-tru ... 1529365844

WASHINGTON—President Donald Trump escalated a trade conflict with China Monday, asking his administration to identify a new list of $200 billion in Chinese goods that would be penalized with tariffs.

The move followed tariffs applied last week on $50 billion in Chinese imports to the U.S., designed to punish China for unfair trade practices. Beijing immediately threatened to retaliate with its own equivalent tariffs on U.S. goods.

...

[C-Mag]

Build the Fucking Wall.

[Zlaxer]

Trump is losing this PR fight. Blaming the democrats works in all sorts of situations, but it's not flying here.


Trump losing GOP and media allies in outcry over separating immigrant families

Andrew Napolitano calls it child abuse; Murdoch is publishing negative OpEds on this, Melania not happy and the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops no likey-like.

I guess congress should do something about their immigration laws then, huh?

THE NEOCONS ARE TRYING TO LOOSEN THE DONALD'S POWER BECAUSE THEY'RE SCARED SHITLESS OF HIS TRADE POLICY!

[Zlaxer]

[Kath]

demand open borders and more white genocide. Surprising.

Wow - we read two entirely different things. Can you quote the article where it says the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops is calling for white genocide?

[Speaker to Animals]

demand open borders and more white genocide. Surprising.

Wow - we read two entirely different things. Can you quote the article where it says the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops is calling for white genocide?

They basically are, Kath. They sold us out because they believe they can get more parishioners when their fake Catholicism has all but destroyed the Church in America.

The irony is that, if they succeed, nobody is going to forget their betrayal of a nation of people and an entire race of people. The Latinos aren't stupid. The Church are causing more harm to themselves with this open borders bullshit than they ever could have by covering up homosexual priests raping boys.


This is actual Catholic thought on immigration:

http://www.newadvent.org/summa/2105.htm#article3

Note the absence of open borders and soft genocides.

I answer that, Man's relations with foreigners are twofold: peaceful, and hostile: and in directing both kinds of relation the Law contained suitable precepts. For the Jews were offered three opportunities of peaceful relations with foreigners. First, when foreigners passed through their land as travelers. Secondly, when they came to dwell in their land as newcomers. And in both these respects the Law made kind provision in its precepts: for it is written (Exodus 22:21): "Thou shalt not molest a stranger [advenam]"; and again (Exodus 22:9): "Thou shalt not molest a stranger [peregrino]." Thirdly, when any foreigners wished to be admitted entirely to their fellowship and mode of worship. With regard to these a certain order was observed. For they were not at once admitted to citizenship: just as it was law with some nations that no one was deemed a citizen except after two or three generations, as the Philosopher says (Polit. iii, 1). The reason for this was that if foreigners were allowed to meddle with the affairs of a nation as soon as they settled down in its midst, many dangers might occur, since the foreigners not yet having the common good firmly at heart might attempt something hurtful to the people. Hence it was that the Law prescribed in respect of certain nations that had close relations with the Jews (viz., the Egyptians among whom they were born and educated, and the Idumeans, the children of Esau, Jacob's brother), that they should be admitted to the fellowship of the people after the third generation; whereas others (with whom their relations had been hostile, such as the Ammonites and Moabites) were never to be admitted to citizenship; while the Amalekites, who were yet more hostile to them, and had no fellowship of kindred with them, were to be held as foes in perpetuity: for it is written (Exodus 17:16): "The war of the Lord shall be against Amalec from generation to generation."

[Haumana]

Styx channeling his inner Razor.