NEVER!
I want my TDS diagnosis retracted, god damnit!
NEVER!
Correctamundo. A non-TDS person doesn’t fucking care about Trump after they’ve said their bit.DBTrek wrote: ↑Fri Jun 05, 2020 12:35 pmHere, quick class for everyone who wants to start writing their online dissertations because a stranger diagnosed them with some form of mental condition. This is the only response you really need:
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Feel free to copy and paste, then peacefully go about your day without giving it a second thought.
Because digging in for a lengthy fight about it just makes the diagnosis look correct.
Those numbers seem off.Martin Hash wrote: ↑Fri Jun 05, 2020 12:35 pmYou’ve said that AND a lot more.Hanarchy Montanarchy wrote: ↑Fri Jun 05, 2020 12:28 pmYou have a license, so you should be well aware that a diagnosis of someone you have never met in a clinical setting is not valid.Martin Hash wrote: ↑Fri Jun 05, 2020 12:24 pm
I actually have the license to diagnose Narcissistic Personality Disorder and Trump doesn’t have it. As I’ve said in the past, TDS will become a recognized diagnosis; I’ve already read doctor’s diagnosing it. You’re not Monte or StA; I don’t know why you picked it up?
You diagnosed me with TDS for saying:
1. I don't agree with many of Trump's policy goals
2. I don't think Trump has achieved many of his policy goals
3. I don't think Trump's talents make him an effective leader
If that counts as TDS, then it is too broad to have valid diagnostic criteria.
BTW, this forum is more of a clinical setting than a doctor’s office. I don’t have to see your face twitch or give you a questionnaire.
I’m a fanboy & host a “TrumpTriumphant” FB group but you bring him up 10x more than me.
100x? I donno, you’re nowhere near Monte?Hanarchy Montanarchy wrote: ↑Fri Jun 05, 2020 12:40 pmThose numbers seem off.Martin Hash wrote: ↑Fri Jun 05, 2020 12:35 pmYou’ve said that AND a lot more.Hanarchy Montanarchy wrote: ↑Fri Jun 05, 2020 12:28 pm
You have a license, so you should be well aware that a diagnosis of someone you have never met in a clinical setting is not valid.
You diagnosed me with TDS for saying:
1. I don't agree with many of Trump's policy goals
2. I don't think Trump has achieved many of his policy goals
3. I don't think Trump's talents make him an effective leader
If that counts as TDS, then it is too broad to have valid diagnostic criteria.
BTW, this forum is more of a clinical setting than a doctor’s office. I don’t have to see your face twitch or give you a questionnaire.
I’m a fanboy & host a “TrumpTriumphant” FB group but you bring him up 10x more than me.
How the fuck do I know? You’d have to exhibit symptoms... But here’s a quick check:GloryofGreece wrote: ↑Fri Jun 05, 2020 12:26 pmWhat's my diagnosis doc?Martin Hash wrote: ↑Fri Jun 05, 2020 12:24 pmI actually have the license to diagnose Narcissistic Personality Disorder and Trump doesn’t have it. As I’ve said in the past, TDS will become a recognized diagnosis; I’ve already read of doctors diagnosing it. You’re not Monte or StA; I don’t know why you picked it up?Hanarchy Montanarchy wrote: ↑Fri Jun 05, 2020 12:19 pm
It is as made up as your TDS diagnosis. We have never met in a clinical setting.
No different from people diagnosing Trump with narcissistic personality disorder from a distance based only on his public comments.
Let's compromise. I will accept your TDS diagnosis as valid, if you accept Trump is a deranged narcissist - or we could agree that neither are clinically valid.
This goes beyond social media. These people are telling their lifelong friends to their faces that they can no longer ever speak to them again because they said not all cops are bad. I don't know of anyone my age who ever went to that extreme over an opinion so benign when they were in their teens, or ever for that matter.Hanarchy Montanarchy wrote: ↑Fri Jun 05, 2020 11:02 amYa'll act like you didn't say and do some dome-ass shit when you were in your teens and early twenties.
I thank God every day that social media didn't exist to catalog my bad ideas and mistakes when I was younger.
kMartin Hash wrote: ↑Fri Jun 05, 2020 12:59 pm100x? I donno, you’re nowhere near Monte?Hanarchy Montanarchy wrote: ↑Fri Jun 05, 2020 12:40 pmThose numbers seem off.Martin Hash wrote: ↑Fri Jun 05, 2020 12:35 pm
You’ve said that AND a lot more.
BTW, this forum is more of a clinical setting than a doctor’s office. I don’t have to see your face twitch or give you a questionnaire.
I’m a fanboy & host a “TrumpTriumphant” FB group but you bring him up 10x more than me.
If you have TDS the answer to #4 depends on Trumps answer. Or you could just a #5 that reads: Trump is in favor of X. Are you in favor of X?Martin Hash wrote: ↑Fri Jun 05, 2020 1:03 pmHow the fuck do I know? You’d have to exhibit symptoms... But here’s a quick check:
1) Do you think Trump is just a stupid, lucky mutterfukker who’s never accomplished anything real?
2) Is every single thing Trump says or does wrong?
3) Would you lockdown your population & destroy the economy just to get Trump out of office?
4) Do you root for China?
I don't know. I have ended friendships over dumb shit. It was always a regrettable mistake. Hopefully these kids will learn that - I assume they will since every generation before them did.PartyOf5 wrote: ↑Fri Jun 05, 2020 1:06 pmThis goes beyond social media. These people are telling their lifelong friends to their faces that they can no longer ever speak to them again because they said not all cops are bad. I don't know of anyone my age who ever went to that extreme over an opinion so benign when they were in their teens, or ever for that matter.Hanarchy Montanarchy wrote: ↑Fri Jun 05, 2020 11:02 amYa'll act like you didn't say and do some dome-ass shit when you were in your teens and early twenties.
I thank God every day that social media didn't exist to catalog my bad ideas and mistakes when I was younger.