Harvey Weinstein: That Time When We Decided To Smash Cultural Marxism Once and for All

User avatar
C-Mag
Posts: 28305
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm

Re: Harvey Weinstein: That Time When We Decided To Smash Cultural Marxism Once and for All

Post by C-Mag » Mon Oct 30, 2017 4:05 pm

He's Gay and a Pederast.

Netflix killed his series House of Cards today.
PLATA O PLOMO


Image


Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience

Okeefenokee
Posts: 12950
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:27 pm
Location: The Great Place

Re: Harvey Weinstein: That Time When We Decided To Smash Cultural Marxism Once and for All

Post by Okeefenokee » Mon Oct 30, 2017 8:11 pm

C-Mag wrote:He's Gay and a Pederast.

Netflix killed his series House of Cards today.
fucking winning!
GrumpyCatFace wrote:Dumb slut partied too hard and woke up in a weird house. Ran out the door, weeping for her failed life choices, concerned townsfolk notes her appearance and alerted the fuzz.

viewtopic.php?p=60751#p60751

User avatar
BjornP
Posts: 3360
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 9:36 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark

Re: Harvey Weinstein: That Time When We Decided To Smash Cultural Marxism Once and for All

Post by BjornP » Tue Oct 31, 2017 12:35 am

C-Mag wrote:He's Gay and a Pederast.

Netflix killed his series House of Cards today.
That's actually pretty impressive given how popular that show is, and how it's been used to promote Netflix over the years.
Fame is not flattery. Respect is not agreement.

Okeefenokee
Posts: 12950
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:27 pm
Location: The Great Place

Re: Harvey Weinstein: That Time When We Decided To Smash Cultural Marxism Once and for All

Post by Okeefenokee » Tue Oct 31, 2017 5:09 am

BjornP wrote:
C-Mag wrote:He's Gay and a Pederast.

Netflix killed his series House of Cards today.
That's actually pretty impressive given how popular that show is, and how it's been used to promote Netflix over the years.
The show shouldn't be popular. Not after where they went with the lead characters.

For a few episodes, they were the ones who'd been done wrong, fighting for what they'd earned, then they turned into cold blooded murderers, and the audience should have said, "welp, there's no reason to keep watching this."

But apparently folks like to cheer for murderers, and vote for rapists and their enablers. /shrug
GrumpyCatFace wrote:Dumb slut partied too hard and woke up in a weird house. Ran out the door, weeping for her failed life choices, concerned townsfolk notes her appearance and alerted the fuzz.

viewtopic.php?p=60751#p60751

User avatar
BjornP
Posts: 3360
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 9:36 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark

Re: Harvey Weinstein: That Time When We Decided To Smash Cultural Marxism Once and for All

Post by BjornP » Tue Oct 31, 2017 10:48 am

Okeefenokee wrote:
BjornP wrote:
C-Mag wrote:He's Gay and a Pederast.

Netflix killed his series House of Cards today.
That's actually pretty impressive given how popular that show is, and how it's been used to promote Netflix over the years.
The show shouldn't be popular. Not after where they went with the lead characters.

For a few episodes, they were the ones who'd been done wrong, fighting for what they'd earned, then they turned into cold blooded murderers, and the audience should have said, "welp, there's no reason to keep watching this."

But apparently folks like to cheer for murderers, and vote for rapists and their enablers. /shrug
I think that TV generally has moved towards sometimes depicting characters that would have been the bad guys in old TV shows as the role of main characters. Criminals, mobsters, serial killer protagonists, drug manufacturers, all have been main characters in the most popular TV series in the last couple decades. I doubt many viewers of that show were cheering for Francis Underwood. He's an almost cartoonishly power-hungry, cynical politician. Even the main character from Breaking Bad had some positive character traits, I believe. Underwood didn't.
Fame is not flattery. Respect is not agreement.

User avatar
pineapplemike
Posts: 4650
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:34 pm

Re: Harvey Weinstein: That Time When We Decided To Smash Cultural Marxism Once and for All

Post by pineapplemike » Tue Oct 31, 2017 10:58 am

Image

Okeefenokee
Posts: 12950
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:27 pm
Location: The Great Place

Re: Harvey Weinstein: That Time When We Decided To Smash Cultural Marxism Once and for All

Post by Okeefenokee » Tue Oct 31, 2017 11:05 am

BjornP wrote:
Okeefenokee wrote:
BjornP wrote:
That's actually pretty impressive given how popular that show is, and how it's been used to promote Netflix over the years.
The show shouldn't be popular. Not after where they went with the lead characters.

For a few episodes, they were the ones who'd been done wrong, fighting for what they'd earned, then they turned into cold blooded murderers, and the audience should have said, "welp, there's no reason to keep watching this."

But apparently folks like to cheer for murderers, and vote for rapists and their enablers. /shrug
I think that TV generally has moved towards sometimes depicting characters that would have been the bad guys in old TV shows as the role of main characters. Criminals, mobsters, serial killer protagonists, drug manufacturers, all have been main characters in the most popular TV series in the last couple decades. I doubt many viewers of that show were cheering for Francis Underwood. He's an almost cartoonishly power-hungry, cynical politician. Even the main character from Breaking Bad had some positive character traits, I believe. Underwood didn't.
Well, they found out people like the idea of a serial killer who talks to his ghost dad, and they found out people like drug dealing, gun running bikers who kill cops and generally terrorize their community, and apparently people are all in for a show about deputy satan lending a hand to the local PD by killing people so they don't have to bother with any of that pesky justice system, so why wouldn't they love a show where a democrat politician murders opponents left right and center?

At least Vince Gilligan had the decency to not make Walter White the protagonist.
GrumpyCatFace wrote:Dumb slut partied too hard and woke up in a weird house. Ran out the door, weeping for her failed life choices, concerned townsfolk notes her appearance and alerted the fuzz.

viewtopic.php?p=60751#p60751

User avatar
SuburbanFarmer
Posts: 25286
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
Location: Ohio

Re: Harvey Weinstein: That Time When We Decided To Smash Cultural Marxism Once and for All

Post by SuburbanFarmer » Tue Oct 31, 2017 11:44 am

Walter White IS the protagonist, for the first 3 seasons.
SJWs are a natural consequence of corporatism.

Formerly GrumpyCatFace

https://youtu.be/CYbT8-rSqo0

Okeefenokee
Posts: 12950
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:27 pm
Location: The Great Place

Re: Harvey Weinstein: That Time When We Decided To Smash Cultural Marxism Once and for All

Post by Okeefenokee » Tue Oct 31, 2017 11:57 am

GrumpyCatFace wrote:Walter White IS the protagonist, for the first 3 seasons.
No, he wasn't.

You were supposed to to figure that out.

He didn't start out a good person who turned bad. He was always wicked, but too cowardly to let it out.

They fucking hammered that theme to death at the end of the show. He tells Skyler in the last episode, "I did it for me. I liked it."
GrumpyCatFace wrote:Dumb slut partied too hard and woke up in a weird house. Ran out the door, weeping for her failed life choices, concerned townsfolk notes her appearance and alerted the fuzz.

viewtopic.php?p=60751#p60751

heydaralon
Posts: 7571
Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2017 7:54 pm

Re: Harvey Weinstein: That Time When We Decided To Smash Cultural Marxism Once and for All

Post by heydaralon » Tue Oct 31, 2017 12:00 pm

Okeefenokee wrote:
GrumpyCatFace wrote:Walter White IS the protagonist, for the first 3 seasons.
No, he wasn't.

You were supposed to to figure that out.

He didn't start out a good person who turned bad. He was always wicked, but too cowardly to let it out.

They fucking hammered that theme to death at the end of the show. He tells Skyler in the last episode, "I did it for me. I liked it."
Another way to interpret the horrible last episode is to say that he simply told her that, so that she would take the foundation money. By telling her that he did it for selfish reasons, he makes her less complicit in his crimes and the money becomes less tainted for her. She will use the money to raise his retard son, because now she can distance herself from her husbands activities. You could be right, but that is another way to view it.
Shikata ga nai