Thus the tautology emerges.Speaker to Animals wrote:Hanarchy Montanarchy wrote:We established that ethnicity isn't static, and then you change the subject to blah blah Arabs.
I am beginning to suspect that your ethnic categories change to suite whatever argument you are trying to make.
It's a meaningless point, Hanarchy. Everything changes over time, even races. Is that why Iraq is such a lovely place in the springtime, because Sunni and Shia are all in flux and they are "All Iraqis"? Do the Hutu and Tutsi really just love each other if only they could accept that "everything is in flux" and they are all Rwandans?
Get real. This is a really bad idea you are defending here. You are ALWAYS playing with fire when you mix disparate nations of people. The more differences the more dangerous and the more explosive the outcome could become.
Anytime a conflict erupts anywhere, you say it is ethnic/cultural. And as evidence, well, the obvious truth that ethnic and cultural differences cause conflict.
Ergo, people can only collaborate if they are sufficiently homogeneous, that sufficiency to be determined by your baroque and interlocking theories about what defines an ethnic group.