THE ERA OF TRUMP

[MilSpecs]

It is actually illegal to funnel the money to Clinton in the same way as well. (undeclared campagin contributions)

But to the point, people pay off folks to not talk about sex all the time. Its not illegal. Based on how fucked up the corruption laws are in the country, I think you will have a very difficult time proving it was specifically for the campaign rather than simply general not wanting porn star sex to come up.

Trump has spent his entire adult life bragging about how much sex he gets, porn star and otherwise, so it’s difficult to argue that he didn’t want it to come up on the basis of anything other than his campaign.

I don’t dispute that Clinton may have also received illegal campaign contributions. I despise her and I think she would do a lot worse, but again, this was blatant.

[nmoore63]

It is actually illegal to funnel the money to Clinton in the same way as well. (undeclared campagin contributions)

But to the point, people pay off folks to not talk about sex all the time. Its not illegal. Based on how fucked up the corruption laws are in the country, I think you will have a very difficult time proving it was specifically for the campaign rather than simply general not wanting porn star sex to come up.

Trump has spent his entire adult life bragging about how much sex he gets, porn star and otherwise, so it’s difficult to argue that he didn’t want it to come up on the basis of anything other than his campaign.

Right... but then you are in a catch-22. Why would he care about it for the campaign either if he's been blah blah blah.

The burden isn't to prove it wasn't for the campaign. The burden is to prove it was.

[nmoore63]

To be clear, they are all fucking sleeze balls. I don't like any of them.

Raiding someone's lawyer though, that takes some pretty high standards. The highest really.

I can point to case after case of guilty as fuck people that were working with the retainer lawyer, that you know is in on all this bullshit... they still never raid the lawyer.

Someone needs to go to jail, and if someone doesn't, then the government person that authorized the raid needs to go to jail.

[C-Mag]

To be clear, they are all fucking sleeze balls. I don't like any of them.

Raiding someone's lawyer though, that takes some pretty high standards. The highest really.

I can point to case after case of guilty as fuck people that were working with the retainer lawyer, that you know is in on all this bullshit... they still never raid the lawyer.

Someone needs to go to jail, and if someone doesn't, then the government person that authorized the raid needs to go to jail.

I've got plenty of problems with Trump................ but this Coup attempt is over the top. It is Imperative that Trump wins this battle, and we should all be in his corner. Because the illegal and unethical methods being used by the Deep State to get Trump will be rapidly turned on the rest of us if they succeed. If the Coup is completed, say goodbye to democratic elections and your vote because they will mean nothing.

Everyone will know the Deep State will put in their figure head and we will be a Banana Republic.

[MilSpecs]

There are limitations on how much an individual can give to a campaign.

Lawyers can’t commit crimes in the defense of clients, or conspire with a client to commit a crime. That’s the difference between a lawyer and a consigliere.

[C-Mag]

There are limitations on how much an individual can give to a campaign.

Lawyers can’t commit crimes in the defense of clients, or conspire with a client to commit a crime. That’s the difference between a lawyer and a consigliere.

Sure, but we need to have Equal Justice under the Law. Our Justice System is singling out Trump. There were around 25 Presidential Candidates that made it to vote tickets................... Why's he the only one singled out for investigation ?

Fuck Them, I say. They don't want to make sure donations are legal, they want to prosecute Trump.

[Fife]

Deep and more than two centuries back. If we could have printed copies of Marbury v. Madison when it was issued and sent them back in a time machine about 16 years to Philadelphia, that whole lifetime tenure for haints like this Miss Judge Playboy Bunny would have never gotten lifetime appointments.

Lol - I'm hoping you'll weigh in on this topic and this is what you give? Can you translate that?

That was not good on my part. Multitasking is not my strong suit. I edited it so that it is at least an English sentence. My point is about how the decision in the Convention to make Article III federal judges lifetime appointees looked good at the time, as far as insulating them from politics is concerned. However, Chief Justice John Marshal changed the game in 1803 forever with Marbury. For all of our history since, we've had scoundrels like Roger Taney, O.W. Holmes, Jr., and a string of other judges who were simple political animals (and lots of others who thought themselves to be virtuous oracles in spite of reality). This floozie Playboy bunny-Soros hoe is just the latest example.

tl;dr: if the framers of the Constitution could see the news today, they would have never given these black-dresses lifetime appointments; and they would have surely tightened up the language on judicial review.

Serendipity!

Just yesterday we talked about this, and this very morning Brion McClanahan gives us a half-hour slam dunk on the subject.

Check this out, Enjoy!

Podcast Episode 157: Marbury v. Madison. Good or Bad?

A listener generated episode. Was Marbury v. Madison a good or bad decision? What are the misconceptions of the case, and what did it mean for the future of American constitutionalism? Get the scoop on this episode of The Brion McClanahan Show.

[Kath]

Thanks! Added to the podcast queue

[C-Mag]

Thanks! Added to the podcast queue

#MeToo

Any Podcast that has a show discussing which POTUS is worst, is a podcast for me, and boy did they pick the right 3 to be at the bottom of the list.

Podcast Episode 154: Wilson, FDR, or LBJ?

[Kath]

I'm looking for a list of stupid shit the media has reported in the "gotcha, Trump!" style, when a simple google search shows this is normal behavior for all presidents.

Most recent FB outrage. "ZOMG! Trump is refusing to go to Barbara Bush's funeral! ASSHAT!"

Me: Did you feel the same when Obama sent Michelle to Nancy's funeral?"

Response: Oh, okay then, I didn't know that. Well, he's still a jerk face.

Rinse. Repeat - we'll do this 2-3 times again next week.