Net Neutrality
-
pineapplemike
- Posts: 4650
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:34 pm
Re: Net Neutrality
What guarantees do we have that the government will keep the internet neutral and unrestricted to users?
-
Speaker to Animals
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: Net Neutrality
pineapplemike wrote:What guarantees do we have that the government will keep the internet neutral and unrestricted to users?
The certainty that you will get fucked right in the ass by Comcast if we deregulate.
Last edited by Speaker to Animals on Fri Nov 24, 2017 3:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
SuburbanFarmer
- Posts: 25230
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
Re: Net Neutrality
This. At least we have some superficial control over the government.Speaker to Animals wrote:pineapplemike wrote:What guarantees do we have that the government will keep the internet neutral and unrestricted to users?
The certainty that you will get fucked right in the ads by Comcast if we detegulate.
-
Speaker to Animals
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: Net Neutrality
I swear to God, I typed that correctly and Android just fucking makes it wrong.
-
Penner
- Posts: 3350
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:00 pm
Re: Net Neutrality
I am on my phone now but I cam repost (later) an article that shows what a country that never had the protection we have with NN. I posted that article in the Era of Trump thread since Ajit Pai, the current FCC chairman that Trump appointed, wants to take NN awayvwith the Dec vote. He also wanted to do this way back in the summer as well.pineapplemike wrote:What guarantees do we have that the government will keep the internet neutral and unrestricted to users?
-
Speaker to Animals
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: Net Neutrality
Nations with regulated internet access have the most advanced and highest broadband speeds in the world. The less regulation, and the more monopolization, the worse it is.
This is macroeconomics 101, guys. I am serious. You should have learned this as a sophomore.
Monopolistic powers are pretty fucking bad for consumers and the entire nation in general. Come on.
This is macroeconomics 101, guys. I am serious. You should have learned this as a sophomore.
Monopolistic powers are pretty fucking bad for consumers and the entire nation in general. Come on.
-
The Conservative
- Posts: 14765
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am
Re: Net Neutrality
No, and satellite (line of sight) internet has been getting faster. To the point, they are blowing away fiber.pineapplemike wrote:Are hard lines necessary to provide internet access?
#NotOneRedCent
-
SuburbanFarmer
- Posts: 25230
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
Re: Net Neutrality
Hardly.The Conservative wrote:No, and satellite (line of sight) internet has been getting faster. To the point, they are blowing away fiber.pineapplemike wrote:Are hard lines necessary to provide internet access?
Unless you’ve got a satellite dedicated exclusively to your house, no.
-
Speaker to Animals
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: Net Neutrality
Sat cannot compete at all. That's what people use up in the mountains around here. It's really fucking bad, actually. Not consistent at all. You cannot possibly compare that to broadband.
-
The Conservative
- Posts: 14765
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am
Re: Net Neutrality
http://www.tested.com/tech/2364-how-a-l ... er-second/Speaker to Animals wrote:Sat cannot compete at all. That's what people use up in the mountains around here. It's really fucking bad, actually. Not consistent at all. You cannot possibly compare that to broadband.
#NotOneRedCent
