The German army did.
Current US Military
-
- Posts: 12241
- Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:04 pm
Re: Current US Military
"Hey varmints, don't mess with a guy that's riding a buffalo"
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: Current US Military
oh so now admits to observing a distinction without a difference, the fallacy parade continuesDBTrek wrote: ↑Thu May 13, 2021 5:00 pmI didn't claim they were. I offered the empyrical observation that none of the major militaries on earth are male-only. And the few male-only militaries on earth are regularly rolled by everyone around them. An observation isn't a statement of direct correlation. If I say "it's hot outside, and the stock market is up" I'm not correlating the two.
But I'm not here to make you smarter.
You're supposed to do your own work on that front.
My observation stands.
Your complainy-pants pedantry falls.
your observation is irrelevant
at least this parade has chicks in the infantry though, right?
Last edited by StCapps on Thu May 13, 2021 5:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.
*yip*
-
- Posts: 36399
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am
Re: Current US Military
sniper in the professional context is more than just issuing a regular soldier a rifle with a scope on it
the physical demands of stalking alone disqualify 90% of male soldiers, the females aren't even close to making it
you can give GI Jane an M40, but if you say that makes her an elite Marine Scout Sniper, that's just not the case
you can carry the females if you have to, but they never make you an elite force
Nec Aspera Terrent
-
- Posts: 12241
- Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:04 pm
Re: Current US Military
Not "admits", but "explains" the difference between observation and claiming a correlation to someone who should honestly know the difference by now.
And don't be jealous of my Army just because it has chicks, and you're still looking.
"Hey varmints, don't mess with a guy that's riding a buffalo"
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: Current US Military
having a more attractive military is of course lethal in war
I guess you are right after all DB, I never considered that obvious edge in combat
*yip*
-
- Posts: 36399
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am
Re: Current US Military
at the end of the day I would decline to fight for any of the degenerate armies who put women on the front lines
Soviet, Israeli, Canadian, it doesn't matter
the whole point of military service is fighting for what you believe in
and I don't believe in putting women in the infantry
the fact that they were softer than warm baby shit and couldn't keep up was secondary to my moral qualms
ethically as well, they also ordered me to lie and say it wasn't a problem, when it was
it was utterly corrosive, everything became a lie, and it destroyed the once best small army in the world
Soviet, Israeli, Canadian, it doesn't matter
the whole point of military service is fighting for what you believe in
and I don't believe in putting women in the infantry
the fact that they were softer than warm baby shit and couldn't keep up was secondary to my moral qualms
ethically as well, they also ordered me to lie and say it wasn't a problem, when it was
it was utterly corrosive, everything became a lie, and it destroyed the once best small army in the world
Nec Aspera Terrent
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: Current US Military
the military needs to change it's standards
to allow more cute, petite and curvy brunettes in
to shore up the decisive "more chicks Capps would want to fuck in the ranks" war fighting edge
make it happen America, don't just concede to that Israel
to allow more cute, petite and curvy brunettes in
to shore up the decisive "more chicks Capps would want to fuck in the ranks" war fighting edge
make it happen America, don't just concede to that Israel
*yip*
-
- Posts: 12241
- Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:04 pm
Re: Current US Military
I respect that, and you're a man of character for sticking with your ideals in spite of repercussions or prevailing trends.Smitty-48 wrote: ↑Thu May 13, 2021 5:17 pmat the end of the day I would decline to fight for any of the degenerate armies who put women on the front lines
Soviet, Israeli, Canadian, it doesn't matter
the whole point of military service is fighting for what you believe in
and I don't believe in putting women in the infantry
the fact that they were softer than warm baby shit and couldn't keep up was secondary to my moral qualms
ethically as well, they also ordered me to lie and say it wasn't a problem, when it was
it was utterly corrosive, everything became a lie, and it destroyed the once best small army in the world
For myself, I believe tech has changed more than just the factory assembly line.
Either way, ain't nobody here serving anymore, so at this point it's moot for ourselves.
"Hey varmints, don't mess with a guy that's riding a buffalo"
-
- Posts: 36399
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am
Re: Current US Military
again, I have no issue with a female controlling a drone swarm from a command bunkerDBTrek wrote: ↑Thu May 13, 2021 6:38 pmI respect that, and you're a man of character for sticking with your ideals in spite of repercussions or prevailing trends.Smitty-48 wrote: ↑Thu May 13, 2021 5:17 pmat the end of the day I would decline to fight for any of the degenerate armies who put women on the front lines
Soviet, Israeli, Canadian, it doesn't matter
the whole point of military service is fighting for what you believe in
and I don't believe in putting women in the infantry
the fact that they were softer than warm baby shit and couldn't keep up was secondary to my moral qualms
ethically as well, they also ordered me to lie and say it wasn't a problem, when it was
it was utterly corrosive, everything became a lie, and it destroyed the once best small army in the world
For myself, I believe tech has changed more than just the factory assembly line.
morally I have an issue with putting women on the front lines in the close combat role
in addition, I found that the operational imperatives of close combat were actually reliant on male dominance
not the dominance of the male physically, the dominance of the hierarchy
that male dominance hierarchy is what makes Rangers, SEALs, Army Delta, women could not have generated that
women are perfectly suited for a supporting role
but at the tip of the spear, it's the brotherhood that binds it all together, that's why we fight for each other
Nec Aspera Terrent
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: Current US Military
chicks in the rear with the gear ftw
at the tip of the spear, not so much
they can't hack it on the front lines
at the tip of the spear, not so much
they can't hack it on the front lines
*yip*