Yet it gets buried by our MSM. 99% of Americans have no idea the Gateway Pundit even exists. Go to Google news or Yahoo news and it's nowhere to be seen. Instead we get pages upon pages every day from garbage sources telling us how Swetnik needs to be heard and how he's not fit to be a judge because he showed legit outrage when having to defend himself against crap like this. The whole MSM is the Onion to me, but it's sad because to a large percentage they are still the source of truth.
Trump's SCOTUS
-
- Posts: 3657
- Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 11:15 am
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
-
- Posts: 28305
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
Swetnick is the least credible of all of them. With what I've read of her own words it appears to me that at a minimum she was at least enjoying being a voyeaur of gang rape sex scenarios if not enjoying being an actual participant.PartyOf5 wrote: ↑Wed Oct 03, 2018 7:30 amYet it gets buried by our MSM. 99% of Americans have no idea the Gateway Pundit even exists. Go to Google news or Yahoo news and it's nowhere to be seen. Instead we get pages upon pages every day from garbage sources telling us how Swetnik needs to be heard and how he's not fit to be a judge because he showed legit outrage when having to defend himself against crap like this. The whole MSM is the Onion to me, but it's sad because to a large percentage they are still the source of truth.
Fact is you can't trust the MSM to give you a broad perspective of any news.
PLATA O PLOMO
Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience
Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience
-
- Posts: 3657
- Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 11:15 am
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
So far 99% of the "facts" claimed have been un-proven.pineapplemike wrote: ↑Wed Oct 03, 2018 7:29 amshe is lying according to her ex-boyfriend, correct? what if he's lying?
What we do have is:
- Building permits and records about Fords remodel that contradict her testimony.
- Records of her flying many times great distances, which contradicts her testimony.
- Signed documents from "witnesses" that contradict....
- Swetnik's history of making past claims and being sued by a company for fraud.
- He likes beer and drank a lot when he was younger. So did I. I drink less than 1 beer a month today.
Nothing that proves he was a sexual predator. Yet the circus must continue.
-
- Posts: 5297
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 2:43 am
- Location: suiþiuþu
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
An nescis, mi fili, quantilla prudentia mundus regatur? - Axel Oxenstierna
Nie lügen die Menschen so viel wie nach einer Jagd, während eines Krieges oder vor Wahlen. - Otto von Bismarck
-
- Posts: 4650
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:34 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
i agree. my comment was in reference to the recent news last night that dr. ford, according to her ex-boyfriend, had previously coached people how to do a polygraph in direct contradiction to her testimonyPartyOf5 wrote: ↑Wed Oct 03, 2018 7:36 amSo far 99% of the "facts" claimed have been un-proven.pineapplemike wrote: ↑Wed Oct 03, 2018 7:29 amshe is lying according to her ex-boyfriend, correct? what if he's lying?
What we do have is:
- Building permits and records about Fords remodel that contradict her testimony.
- Records of her flying many times great distances, which contradicts her testimony.
- Signed documents from "witnesses" that contradict....
- Swetnik's history of making past claims and being sued by a company for fraud.
- He likes beer and drank a lot when he was younger. So did I. I drink less than 1 beer a month today.
Nothing that proves he was a sexual predator. Yet the circus must continue.
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
You do not get to play it both ways. If her ex-boyfriend should not be believed without evidence, then neither should she be believed. If we cannot accept his word, then faggots need to shut the fuck up about "rapists on the Supreme Court".
But the real crux of the issue is that we can prove she fucking lied about a number of things. His sworn testimony only corroborates the evidence.
This bitch belongs in prison for a long fucking time for what she did to that man. All women who do this belong in prison.
But the real crux of the issue is that we can prove she fucking lied about a number of things. His sworn testimony only corroborates the evidence.
This bitch belongs in prison for a long fucking time for what she did to that man. All women who do this belong in prison.
Last edited by Speaker to Animals on Wed Oct 03, 2018 7:57 am, edited 2 times in total.
-
- Posts: 28305
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
Check this out guys...……………… Swetnicks Ex-Boyfriend revealed Swetnick likes Gang Bangs.
A Lousiana Congressman has referred Swetnick for criminal investigation for making false charges. This all needs to be made public. Parade in a bunch of guys who succumbed to her requests for gang bangs, just put all the Nasty on the public record of this Nasty Woman.An ex-boyfriend of Julie Swetnick, who has accused Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh of facilitating gang rapes, said she never mentioned being gang raped to him — but did tell him that she liked to have sex with multiple men at the same time.
“In fact sometimes with several at one time. She wanted to know if that would be OK in our relationship,” Ketterer wrote. “I asked her if this was just a fantasy of hers. She responded that she first tried sex with multiple guys while in high school and still liked it from time-to-time.”
~ Dennis Ketterer
https://truthfeednews.com/swetnicks-ex- ... ire-story/
PLATA O PLOMO
Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience
Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience
-
- Posts: 28305
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
+1Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Wed Oct 03, 2018 7:54 amYou do not get to play it both ways. If her ex-boyfriend should not be believed without evidence, then neither should she be believed. If we cannot accept his word, then faggots need to shut the fuck up about "rapists on the Supreme Court".
But the real crux of the issue is that we can prove she fucking lied about a number of things. His sworn testimony only corroborates the evidence.
This bitch belongs in prison for a long fucking ti for what she did to that man. All women who do this belong in prison.
The point is they want this to be a family court where women can say whatever they want and are to be trusted and mens testimony is not allowed.
PLATA O PLOMO
Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience
Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience
-
- Posts: 12241
- Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:04 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
Pro tip: Proof is never derived from he-said she-said.
We got folks here as nutty as the Christine Ford believers who think their strong feelings paired with unfounded allegations of third-parties miraculously produces “proof”, but it doesn’t.
We got folks here as nutty as the Christine Ford believers who think their strong feelings paired with unfounded allegations of third-parties miraculously produces “proof”, but it doesn’t.
"Hey varmints, don't mess with a guy that's riding a buffalo"
-
- Posts: 18721
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:02 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
The current Dem narrative is that Kavanaugh lied about being a virgin and how many beers he drank, so he lied under oath and should be impeached if he is confirmed.
Shamedia, Shamdemic, Shamucation, Shamlection, Shamconomy & Shamate Change