Weed legalization thread

[DBTrek]

At this point Sessions hasn't done fuck all except he threw an Obama era guideline memo in the trash, whoop dee do

Subject mastery comparison:
StCapps on American drug issues.
Oregonians on pumping their own gas.

100% match

[StCapps]

At this point Sessions hasn't done fuck all except he threw an Obama era guideline memo in the trash, whoop dee do

Subject mastery comparison:
StCapps on American drug issues.
Oregonians on pumping their own gas.

100% match

Has no counter-argument, and resorts to apples to oranges cross thread comparisons to dismiss my position. Sad.

[DBTrek]

Your position is that you have no clue what’s going on, therefore it’s no biggie. It isn’t rocket science.

I concur, you have no clue, ergo no counter argument is required.

It’s like arguing cyber security with the Amish. Once it’s apparent that they’re completely out of their depth, what’s the point of a rebuttal? They probably wouldn’t understand the response anyway, so they’d just repeat their talking points as naseum wasting everyone’s time.
/shrug

[StCapps]

Your position is that you have no clue what’s going on, therefore it’s no biggie. It isn’t rocket science.

I conclude the same thing about you, based on your lack of a counter-argument. If I really had no idea what was going on, it would easy to set me straight, yet you refuse to even attempt it. Either you're lazy or wrong, and either way, I'm winning this exchange.

[K@th]

I'm winning this exchange.

Not from my POV. Contrary to your belief, you are not the leading expert on every single topic.

[StCapps]

I'm winning this exchange.

Not from my POV. Contrary to your belief, you are not the leading expert on every single topic.

When I'm arguing against no argument, it's not hard to win. You don't have to be the leading expert on every topic to win, if your argument is superior to the oppositions, you're winning, especially when the otherside is too wrong or lazy to even put forward an argument.
/shrugs

[SilverEagle]

I'm winning this exchange.

Not from my POV. Contrary to your belief, you are not the leading expert on every single topic.

When I'm arguing against no argument, it's not hard to win. You don't have to be the leading expert on every topic to win, if your argument is superior to the oppositions, you're winning, especially when the otherside is too wrong or lazy to even put forward an argument.
/shrugs

You're dead wrong on this topic.

[StCapps]

You're dead wrong on this topic.

Still awaiting a counter argument. You're wrong, simply doesn't cut it.

[DBTrek]

When I'm arguing against no argument, it's not hard to win. You don't have to be the leading expert on every topic to win, if your argument is superior to the oppositions, you're winning, especially when the otherside is too wrong or lazy to even put forward an argument.
/shrugs

Dead right, keep my head right, DB there ery'night
Trek here been smooth since days of Underroos
Never lose, never choose to, bruise crews who
Do something to us, talk go through us
Feds walk to us, wanna do us, screw us
Who us? Yeah, DB and Fife (hehehe)
Close like Starsky and Hutch, stick the clutch
Dare I squeeze three at your cherry M-3
Bang every Capps post easily, busily
Recently niggas frontin ain't sayin' nuttin' (nope) so I just
Speak my piece, keep my piece
Cubans with the Jesus piece, with my peeps
Packin', askin' who want it, you got it nigga flaunt it
That StCapps bullshit, we on it
Now who's the real dookie, meanin' who's really the shit
StCapps ride dicks, while DB push the sticks
On the Lexus, LX, four and a half
Bulletproof glass tints if I want some ass
Gon' blast squeeze first ask questions last
That's how most of these so-called gangsters pass

[K@th]

You're dead wrong on this topic.

Still awaiting a counter argument. You're wrong, simply doesn't cut it.

You never listen, anyway, so it doesn't matter. You just claim to be the Trump Whisperer and knower of all things.