Harvey Weinstein: That Time When We Decided To Smash Cultural Marxism Once and for All

[Ph64]

Witch trials already commencing. All it takes is for one former female employee to make the allegation and your shit is done.

Yeah, but think of all the jobs opening up for the new class of female executives.

Like my job 15yrs ago, the old boss retired (65) and they brought in an Irish national woman (green card), stupid in the first place since a lot of us (including the old boss) had DOD security clearances and there wasn't a chance in hell of her getting one. She had it out for "men", we were all "deadwood", she promptly promoted all the women to managers and started writing up and then getting rid of us horrible men.

I was the 4th to go, the temp went immediately, one coworker got assigned a project that should've taken 2 weeks - she gave him a week, and when I stayed late to help him out she made her displeasure at that known... She was hired in July, he was gone by Oct. My project in the meantime was to automate a bunch of stuff so she could "early retire" a 63y/o coworker - I felt bad but talking to him he was OK with it, he got a deal to leave early, he was gone end of January, then she started in on me - same MO, "how long will it take you?", two weeks, "I need it by Friday" - worked 12+hr's/day, taking work home, walked into her office at 4:30pm Friday with it done... "Not good enough, I needed it by 3pm, you're written up" (total bs of course). Third time, early July, I had my resignation letter written up and a new job in the works (waiting for the offer letter that came 3 days later) - and she was *pissed* that I gave her a resignation, literally said to my face "I don't know if I want to accept this, I should fire you".

I just calmly said "let's see what HR says", since it seems obvious they'd rather take a resignation than fire someone and risk potential legal blowback. Funny thing is I knew all the people in HR for many years (all women except the director), they all saw what she was doing but when I said there's probably no chance in hell I could ever win a court case on "sex discrimination" they all agreed.

[Alexander PhiAlipson]

Spot on response to this by Milo

Harvey Weinstein is a scumbag and I hope he gets locked up. But I’m not applauding the self-serving actresses dancing on his grave, nor even the BRAVE HEROINES who finally broke rank. Rose McGowan remained quiet until it was more professionally advantageous to speak out than to stay silent. How many young girls were attacked while she kept her mouth shut on her way to becoming rich and famous? And I don’t believe the people who say they didn’t know — not for a second. As far as I’m concerned, the entire Hollywood ecosystem is rotten and dripping with spiritual putrefaction. Burn it.

One could make the same argument about predatory priests who abused teen boys..

Ah, the good old Mephistophelean incentive--I fuck you up the ass; you get rich and famous! (As a bonus, if you don't tell anyone, you go to Heaven.)
works every time.

[SuburbanFarmer]

Witch trials already commencing. All it takes is for one former female employee to make the allegation and your shit is done.

Yeah, but think of all the jobs opening up for the new class of female executives.

Like my job 15yrs ago, the old boss retired (65) and they brought in an Irish national woman (green card), stupid in the first place since a lot of us (including the old boss) had DOD security clearances and there wasn't a chance in hell of her getting one. She had it out for "men", we were all "deadwood", she promptly promoted all the women to managers and started writing up and then getting rid of us horrible men.

I was the 4th to go, the temp went immediately, one coworker got assigned a project that should've taken 2 weeks - she gave him a week, and when I stayed late to help him out she made her displeasure at that known... She was hired in July, he was gone by Oct. My project in the meantime was to automate a bunch of stuff so she could "early retire" a 63y/o coworker - I felt bad but talking to him he was OK with it, he got a deal to leave early, he was gone end of January, then she started in on me - same MO, "how long will it take you?", two weeks, "I need it by Friday" - worked 12+hr's/day, taking work home, walked into her office at 4:30pm Friday with it done... "Not good enough, I needed it by 3pm, you're written up" (total bs of course). Third time, early July, I had my resignation letter written up and a new job in the works (waiting for the offer letter that came 3 days later) - and she was *pissed* that I gave her a resignation, literally said to my face "I don't know if I want to accept this, I should fire you".

I just calmly said "let's see what HR says", since it seems obvious they'd rather take a resignation than fire someone and risk potential legal blowback. Funny thing is I knew all the people in HR for many years (all women except the director), they all saw what she was doing but when I said there's probably no chance in hell I could ever win a court case on "sex discrimination" they all agreed.

Jesus H, where was that, Walmart?? Sounds like a damn slave ship.

[Ex-California]

Women should probably be relegated back to 19th Century roles. They aren't ready for it yet.

[Ex-California]

in the latest installment of Buzzfeed is Cancer

Buzzfeed feminist laments that Harvey Weinstein only raped white women

While flocks of women are reliving and telling tales of their disturbing experiences with alleged Hollywood predator Harvey Weinstein, one of Buzzfeed’s woke black writers has other things on her mind; the lack of diversity of his victims.

In an article for Buzzfeed titled “There’s an elephant in Harvey Weinstein’s hotel room”, Feminist Bim Adewunmi laments the fact that all of Harvey’s victims are white, and argues that the reason black women do not get leading roles in movies is because they are often seen as “not fuckable” by producers.

She argues that while the sexual assault allegations against Harvey are mainly being an issue about sexual harassment, they are also an issue about race:

The elephant in the room in discussions about the alleged crimes and misdemeanors of Hollywood film producer Harvey Weinstein looks eerily similar to an elephant of the past. It is the Race elephant. And among the allegations, the question of race is one that we are not really looking to engage with, because it is knotty and gnarly. But it bears talking about, because there are black women in Hollywood, and not talking about it does us all a disservice.

In Hollywood, where both racism and sexism are rampant, what can look like a sort of mitigated blessing ends up highlighting another insidious problem in (the societal microcosm that is) Hollywood: Black women do not often come up for the kind of prestigious high-profile and award-winning roles that a producer with Weinstein’s power could offer.

……..If we are to discern a general message about black women (and other women of color) from the product churned out by Hollywood, it is that they are not seen as leading role material, and that is intertwined with the idea that they are not desirable “trophies.”

I would think not being considered a desirable trophy by a sexual predator is a good thing… but that’s just me.

She continues:


…….the narrative coming out of Hollywood right now is about the victims who have come forward with allegations specifically against Harvey Weinstein, and that list is largely made up of white women. This is worth remarking upon, not because it is odd, but because it is decidedly quotidian, considering who is permitted to be in the room at even the lowest levels of the industry.

…….In an industry as white as Hollywood, the racially problematic “attraction question” is part of what reduces the shelf life of black actresses as a matter of course, causing many of them to get half as far in twice the time it takes their white counterparts. To be deemed “fuckable” is not the honor a certain kind of man (and woman) believes it to be, but the ideas of fuckability are entrenched, and they serve to exclude black women very early on in the conversation — while dooming the women who do go on to get the roles to gross sexual harassment or assault

Now this is where things start getting weird.

She lists the different movies that have been produced by Weinstein’s production company, and notes that very few of them have starred black women. Her conclusion: Harvey Weinstein doesn’t want to sexually abused black women (As if that is a bad thing):

A cursory glance of both companies’ slates suggests fewer than 10 films starring black women or other women of color, Jackie Brown (1997), Frida (2002), Bride and Prejudice (2004), and Southside With You (2016) being the most recognizable. Black women weren’t even making it into Weinstein’s predatory thought process except, probably, to be expressly excluded.

I guess we should be alarmed that a serial sexual harasser didn’t incorporate diversity into his harassment escapades.

Thanks, Buzzfeed.

[Okeefenokee]

[TheReal_ND]

in the latest installment of Buzzfeed is Cancer

Buzzfeed feminist laments that Harvey Weinstein only raped white women

While flocks of women are reliving and telling tales of their disturbing experiences with alleged Hollywood predator Harvey Weinstein, one of Buzzfeed’s woke black writers has other things on her mind; the lack of diversity of his victims.

In an article for Buzzfeed titled “There’s an elephant in Harvey Weinstein’s hotel room”, Feminist Bim Adewunmi laments the fact that all of Harvey’s victims are white, and argues that the reason black women do not get leading roles in movies is because they are often seen as “not fuckable” by producers.

She argues that while the sexual assault allegations against Harvey are mainly being an issue about sexual harassment, they are also an issue about race:

The elephant in the room in discussions about the alleged crimes and misdemeanors of Hollywood film producer Harvey Weinstein looks eerily similar to an elephant of the past. It is the Race elephant. And among the allegations, the question of race is one that we are not really looking to engage with, because it is knotty and gnarly. But it bears talking about, because there are black women in Hollywood, and not talking about it does us all a disservice.

In Hollywood, where both racism and sexism are rampant, what can look like a sort of mitigated blessing ends up highlighting another insidious problem in (the societal microcosm that is) Hollywood: Black women do not often come up for the kind of prestigious high-profile and award-winning roles that a producer with Weinstein’s power could offer.

……..If we are to discern a general message about black women (and other women of color) from the product churned out by Hollywood, it is that they are not seen as leading role material, and that is intertwined with the idea that they are not desirable “trophies.”

I would think not being considered a desirable trophy by a sexual predator is a good thing… but that’s just me.

She continues:


…….the narrative coming out of Hollywood right now is about the victims who have come forward with allegations specifically against Harvey Weinstein, and that list is largely made up of white women. This is worth remarking upon, not because it is odd, but because it is decidedly quotidian, considering who is permitted to be in the room at even the lowest levels of the industry.

…….In an industry as white as Hollywood, the racially problematic “attraction question” is part of what reduces the shelf life of black actresses as a matter of course, causing many of them to get half as far in twice the time it takes their white counterparts. To be deemed “fuckable” is not the honor a certain kind of man (and woman) believes it to be, but the ideas of fuckability are entrenched, and they serve to exclude black women very early on in the conversation — while dooming the women who do go on to get the roles to gross sexual harassment or assault

Now this is where things start getting weird.

She lists the different movies that have been produced by Weinstein’s production company, and notes that very few of them have starred black women. Her conclusion: Harvey Weinstein doesn’t want to sexually abused black women (As if that is a bad thing):

A cursory glance of both companies’ slates suggests fewer than 10 films starring black women or other women of color, Jackie Brown (1997), Frida (2002), Bride and Prejudice (2004), and Southside With You (2016) being the most recognizable. Black women weren’t even making it into Weinstein’s predatory thought process except, probably, to be expressly excluded.

I guess we should be alarmed that a serial sexual harasser didn’t incorporate diversity into his harassment escapades.

Thanks, Buzzfeed.

Uh... it's no surprise the Jew wanted to bed shiksas. It's more surprising anyone would want to bed black women. Fwiw Jews will bed and molest blacks a lot more than most.

Weinstein scandal prompts actors Terry Crews, James Van Der Beek to share harassment stories
http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/la ... story.html

[Speaker to Animals]

Women should probably be relegated back to 19th Century roles. They aren't ready for it yet.

A lot of men are just outright saying it.

[Fife]

Skepticism is heresy. We're in a bad fucking position.

The danger of belief

NBC News published an extraordinary article this week. One of those articles where the headline’s enough to make you want to resign from the human race and live out your days in a yurt in the arse-end of nowhere. ‘Why Are We Still Teaching To Kill A Mockingbird In Schools?’, the headline asked. Or rather baited. The piece is full of the usual guff, about how Harper Lee’s classic is an “adult fairytale” unfit for younger children, how its use of the N-word could make black schoolkids feel insecure, etc, etc. But there’s something else in the article, too, something that makes it noteworthy in the current, rape-culture-obsessed moment: its concern that Lee’s book might discourage people from believing women who say they’ve been raped.

. . .

So the NBC piece isn’t as eccentric as it first seems. It speaks to a now mainstream view: that women (and children) who claim to have been sexually assaulted must be instantly, uncritically believed. “I believe” has been the rallying cry of feminists and journalists and others for years. “Believe the women”, they say, just as anti-abuse campaigners in the 1980s and 1990s said “Believe the children” about children who claimed they had been taken into forests and ritually molested by men in black cloaks (they hadn’t). Frowning at Lee’s tale of disbelief, of scepticism in the face of a rape accusation, its celebration of a good, righteous man who effectively says “Don’t believe this woman”, makes perfect sense today. We’re likely to see more agitation against, or at least discomfort with, Lee’s novel.

[Fife]

Bring out yer victims! Bring out yer victims!

Stop with the Groping Stories. George H.W. Bush is Not About to Become Woke. [VIDEO]

Ho hum, another day, and another woman comes out of the woodwork claiming that former President George H.W. Bush groped her.

This time it’s author Christina Baker Kline, writing in Slate about her 2014 experience. And not only does Kline have her story, she has proof! As in a picture of GHWB with his hand on her butt!