THE ERA OF TRUMP
-
- Posts: 4650
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:34 pm
Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP
The Obama painting is dope, the Michelle one is pretty weak though..
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP
Trump should commission a painting of himself holding Kathy Griffon's severed head.
-
- Posts: 3360
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 9:36 am
- Location: Aalborg, Denmark
Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP
Must remember to slim yourself on canvas, for posterity.
Fame is not flattery. Respect is not agreement.
-
- Posts: 25287
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP
Honestly, how is that dope? (let alone 'Presidential')pineapplemike wrote:The Obama painting is dope, the Michelle one is pretty weak though..
It looks washed out, with zero depth.. He did some nice work on the face, but that's about it.
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP
Might as well have gone with Britto.
-
- Posts: 3513
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 8:39 am
Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP
There is a picture that shows it less washed out, but it's still not anything I would call presidential. The face looks great, but him sitting among overgrown greenery is just odd.
Account abandoned.
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP
I mean.. for the first gay president not counting Buchanan, I guess it's appropriate. But shouldn't Michael's portrait be more muscular in style?
-
- Posts: 25287
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP
God, that's even worse. He's got a glaring light source on one side of the face, that doesn't affect anything else in the frame. Then a nose shadow going the other way. It's garbage.Kath wrote:There is a picture that shows it less washed out, but it's still not anything I would call presidential. The face looks great, but him sitting among overgrown greenery is just odd.
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP
Nice big hands though.GrumpyCatFace wrote:God, that's even worse. He's got a glaring light source on one side of the face, that doesn't affect anything else in the frame. Then a nose shadow going the other way. It's garbage.Kath wrote:There is a picture that shows it less washed out, but it's still not anything I would call presidential. The face looks great, but him sitting among overgrown greenery is just odd.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.