2020 election

[C-Mag]

The polls are showing that re-examining endless war is a popular notion amongst people who are not shareholders in the MIC.

[Fife]

The polls are showing that re-examining endless war is a popular notion amongst people who are not shareholders in the MIC.

People who should know the difference do know the difference. https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/p ... -donations

The MSM is well-schooled in keeping this kind of sentiment tightly wrapped, however. Maybe it's time for a breakout. Here's hoping.

[C-Mag]

The polls are showing that re-examining endless war is a popular notion amongst people who are not shareholders in the MIC.

People who should know the difference do know the difference. https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/p ... -donations

The MSM is well-schooled in keeping this kind of sentiment tightly wrapped, however. Maybe it's time for a breakout. Here's hoping.

I still hold that one of Trump's ace in the hole that was never talked about was his foreign policy based on controlling and ending forever war. It's also his achilles with his voters. If the Deep State can lure him into a new war, Trump will have a very difficult time getting re-elected.

[Speaker to Animals]

The actual progressives I think are going to fall in behind in her growing numbers now.




That lunatic position of endless war is really indefensible. They cannot control discussion about how insane they are in trying to perpetuate War World. It's also really a position that can only be pushed by veterans. When non-serving, free-loading liberals advocate it, it just comes off as totally fucking pathetic and weak, and everybody can feel this is true in their bones. If you want endless war, then you should go fight them first.

[Speaker to Animals]

And another thing Tulsi has going for her that I dare so almost nobody on the left is going to admit: she ameliorates their sense of weakness. Instead of fielding these total beta males and shrieking harpies, Tulsi is an actual strong woman, with real honor and real courage. That goes a long way, in my estimation, for an electorate that is plagued with self-doubt and low-confidence.

There is that one guy who is also a veteran, so he might be able to step in and seize that role as well, but I don't see the others doing it, and this is really something the left needs right now psychologically.

[C-Mag]

NYTimes says Pocahontas won the debate hands down, Aced it!

[Fife]

People with two brain cells left to rub together and more than 10cc of testosterone remaining respect the shit out of Tulsi. The same thing goes for Ron Paul.

Low-T losers, marxists, morons, and dopeheads don't respect bravery or principled reasoning and speaking. They only respect the gibs and their next shot of morphine.

[Speaker to Animals]

Based as fuck.

[C-Mag]

The actual progressives I think are going to fall in behind in her growing numbers now.




That lunatic position of endless war is really indefensible. They cannot control discussion about how insane they are in trying to perpetuate War World. It's also really a position that can only be pushed by veterans. When non-serving, free-loading liberals advocate it, it just comes off as totally fucking pathetic and weak, and everybody can feel this is true in their bones. If you want endless war, then you should go fight them first.

It will be interesting to watch. If we truly want to have some sort of debate on endless war we should all donate $5 to Tulsi, get her in that next debate so she can continue to make this an issue. I'm going to donate. Not that I really want her as POTUS, but she raises the big question that has to be debated.

I would agree that veterans are the perfect group to push this issue to the forefront.

[Speaker to Animals]

My Tulsi Battle Angel can scrap. Please God put her in a debate with Trump.