North Korea News

[Speaker to Animals]

I wonder if 4Chan could troll some of them into lighting themselves on fire, though. They got feminists to piss their pants for gender equality.

[SuburbanFarmer]

No, Russia and China could easily use that as justification to retaliate and further pummel the US after eating a nuclear uppercut from NK. If they want to be king shit on the playground, kick the bully when he's down and finish him off.

I'm pretty sure if NK is going balls out and letting nukes fly, Japan and South Korea's concerns aren't going to involve fallout from the US retaliation strike.

No nuclear weapon from NK is going to disable our humanity-ending response.

Russia and China are not suicide cults.

Ergo, no full spread from Russia or China, no matter what we do to Nork. Ever.

There's nothing to be gained from Russia or China launching at us, and eating the full-spread response. MAD is still in effect. Period.

Oh, how nice it would be to be so nieve again...

How exactly is that naive?

Naive.

[Speaker to Animals]

*Naïve

[SuburbanFarmer]

*Naïve

Ain't nobody got time for fucking umlauts.

[Smitty-48]

There's not much to be gained for Russia and China in any sort of conventional response neither, going to war for Pyongyang doesn't make any sense for China nor Russia, unless they're planning to got to war anyways, which again, means that Pyongyang is just their stalking horse, but I don't think that's necessarily so.

Now, again, Redwings over the CONUS is of critical strategic interest to the United States, but there's quite a few other things which are irritants for Russia and China, which are not of critical interest to the United States, so I think there's actually plenty of room for quid pro quo between the Great Powers, cutting Pyongyang out of the deal, so long as America aligns with its actually critical interests, and then lets Russia and China have their due where America's critical interests are not threatened.

[Kazmyr]

No nuclear weapon from NK is going to disable our humanity-ending response.

Russia and China are not suicide cults.

Ergo, no full spread from Russia or China, no matter what we do to Nork. Ever.

There's nothing to be gained from Russia or China launching at us, and eating the full-spread response. MAD is still in effect. Period.

So then why not B61 them and be done worrying about NK letting nukes go?

[The Conservative]

No nuclear weapon from NK is going to disable our humanity-ending response.

Russia and China are not suicide cults.

Ergo, no full spread from Russia or China, no matter what we do to Nork. Ever.

There's nothing to be gained from Russia or China launching at us, and eating the full-spread response. MAD is still in effect. Period.

Oh, how nice it would be to be so nieve again...

WTF are you talking about. GCF is right. Russia is not going to do shit and China is not going to do shit, nuclear or conventional because one would be physical MAD and the later would be financial MAD.

China is already is a financial slump, and is quickly getting worse with each passing month. Sooner or later (depending on how their currency holds up) it will not be a matter of if, but when will China do something.

[The Conservative]

I wonder if 4Chan could troll some of them into lighting themselves on fire, though. They got feminists to piss their pants for gender equality.

Piss and bleed don't forget.

[SuburbanFarmer]

No nuclear weapon from NK is going to disable our humanity-ending response.

Russia and China are not suicide cults.

Ergo, no full spread from Russia or China, no matter what we do to Nork. Ever.

There's nothing to be gained from Russia or China launching at us, and eating the full-spread response. MAD is still in effect. Period.

So then why not B61 them and be done worrying about NK letting nukes go?

Because there is no difference between pre-emptive nuclear strikes, based on explosive yield.

[Smitty-48]

No nuclear weapon from NK is going to disable our humanity-ending response.

Russia and China are not suicide cults.

Ergo, no full spread from Russia or China, no matter what we do to Nork. Ever.

There's nothing to be gained from Russia or China launching at us, and eating the full-spread response. MAD is still in effect. Period.

So then why not B61 them and be done worrying about NK letting nukes go?

Because there is no difference between pre-emptive nuclear strikes, based on explosive yield.

It's not a preemptive strike against China nor Russia, and at low yield, it doesn't impact them, so why do they blow the world up over that again?

Launch on warning is use them or lose them, but since they ain't gonna lose them, why would they use them?