President Trump - 1st State of the Union

[The Conservative]

Someone looks like they either ate or smelled something bad.

27459494_1102061866598374_6502239309134422620_n.jpg

[clubgop]

We want to make jokes here but the undercover hacks won't respond to the genius that is the democrats putting a Kennedy in front of a car wreck? Come on people.

[clubgop]

Someone looks like they either ate or smelled something bad.

27459494_1102061866598374_6502239309134422620_n.jpg

Stop being a sexist ignoramus. You obviously have no idea about the subtle nuances of botoxed facial expressions.

[The Conservative]

We want to make jokes here but the undercover hacks won't respond to the genius that is the democrats putting a Kennedy in front of a car wreck? Come on people.

We already know what happens when the Democrats have a Kennedy as part of a car wreck.

[The Conservative]

Someone looks like they either ate or smelled something bad.

27459494_1102061866598374_6502239309134422620_n.jpg

Stop being a sexist ignoramus. You obviously have no idea about the subtle nuances of botoxed facial expressions.

Yeah, looks like she's ready to do a vomit comet.

[Speaker to Animals]

They aren't cheering for him on this point, because he had very little to do with it.

The unemployment rate among African Americans has been steadily declining since March 2010, when 16.8 percent of African Americans were unemployed. By the time Trump entered office in January of 2017, the African American unemployment rate had already decreased 9 points. While Trump was in office, it decreased by one point — keeping up a trend that had already been in place.

http://fortune.com/2018/01/30/trump-sta ... mployment/

The question you need to ask yourselves is *why*.

I suspect it's because most blacks are either in prison or on welfare (and thus not counted).. It's hardly as if their situation got any better in the democratic-controlled cities.

[StCapps]

there are better solutions than pretending coal is more economically viable, safe, or environmentally friendly than it actually is.

Also there are better solutions than pretending green energy is more economically viable, safe, or environmentally friendly than it actually is.

What is it you repeat ad nausium on other subjects..

perfect is the enemy of good

Renewable energy doesn't need to be perfect, it just needs to be better than coal.

There are better options than renewable energy, there are better alternatives, settling for wind and solar at the moment makes little sense in most situations. There are more options than coal, wind and solar, so being ever so slightly better than one obvious energy boondoggle doesn't make the other energy boondoggles a good idea to subsidize. Perfect is the enemy of good, but bad is also the enemy of good, so settling for bad, not the wisest strategy in the world when the good is already available.

[StCapps]

I don't want them propping up a bad industry with federal tax dollars, that's a poor use of taxpayer funds, whether it's Clean Coal, or Obama's green energy initiative. Subsidized energy boondoggle doesn't become desirable because it's a fossil fuel or green energy.

New technologies are often subsidized because R&D is expensive, and not initially profitable. That isn't inherently a boondoggle.

Not inherently, but it often is a boondoggle, because solar and wind aren't ready for primetime, for the most part, the environmentalists just wish that they were, but wishful thinking doesn't make it so.

Throwing money at boondoggles in the name of R&D is as stupid as throwing money at boondoggles for any other noble reason, the road to hell is paved with good intentions, good intentions don't always equal good results.

[C-Mag]

Hey...... where the Hell ya been.... missed ya

[clubgop]

I don't want them propping up a bad industry with federal tax dollars, that's a poor use of taxpayer funds, whether it's Clean Coal, or Obama's green energy initiative. Subsidized energy boondoggle doesn't become desirable because it's a fossil fuel or green energy.

New technologies are often subsidized because R&D is expensive, and not initially profitable. That isn't inherently a boondoggle.

Not inherently, but it often is a boondoggle, because solar and wind aren't ready for primetime, for the most part, the environmentalists just wish that they were, but wishful thinking doesn't make it so.

Throwing money at boondoggles in the name of R&D is as stupid as throwing money at boondoggles for any other noble reason, the road to hell is paved with good intentions, good intentions don't always equal good results.

Yeah it like the white elephant in the room, Instead of giving money to NK and Iran by the billions for nuclear "power" why don't we do the same?