CS 317 Shades of Grey

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: CS 317 Shades of Grey

Post by Speaker to Animals » Sun Nov 12, 2017 8:44 pm

ssu wrote:
Speaker to Animals wrote:I think they knew vaguely enough that they were voting for hostilities with Russia. The bitch hardly made a secret of it.
Oh boy, are the Russians good at what they do. Can't do nothing but praise them. Knew they were good, but this awesome?

LOL. Say what?

Not wanting to start WW3 with Russia is not "praising them", clown. Keep your hysterics to a minimum.

User avatar
TheReal_ND
Posts: 26035
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:23 pm

Re: CS 317 Shades of Grey

Post by TheReal_ND » Sun Nov 12, 2017 8:50 pm

Ssu is the most anti-Trump/populist and anti-Russia poster I've ever seen. And I've seen a lot.

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: CS 317 Shades of Grey

Post by Speaker to Animals » Sun Nov 12, 2017 8:52 pm

I am starting to think that guy is the Finnish version of a crackpot.

User avatar
Martin Hash
Posts: 18728
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:02 pm

Re: CS 317 Shades of Grey

Post by Martin Hash » Sun Nov 12, 2017 9:25 pm

ssu used to be one of my favorite posters. What the hell happened? Trump Derangement Syndrome.

My son lives in Peru. They only get CNN and a constant anti-Trump stream from their own news. He is usually quite open-minded, but for 3 or 4 days we couldn’t talk Trump in a rational manner. Same thing in Australia when I was there earlier this year. Propaganda works.
Shamedia, Shamdemic, Shamucation, Shamlection, Shamconomy & Shamate Change

User avatar
ssu
Posts: 2142
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 4:05 pm

Re: CS 317 Shades of Grey

Post by ssu » Sun Nov 12, 2017 11:40 pm

Speaker to Animals wrote:Not wanting to start WW3 with Russia is not "praising them", clown. Keep your hysterics to a minimum.
The hysterics is believing that EITHER candidate in the 2016 election meant WW3.

User avatar
ssu
Posts: 2142
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 4:05 pm

Re: CS 317 Shades of Grey

Post by ssu » Sun Nov 12, 2017 11:44 pm

Nukedog wrote:Ssu is the most anti-Trump/populist and anti-Russia poster I've ever seen. And I've seen a lot.
Anti-Russia? You see we know those guys, and how smartly they meddle in politics of a country if they can...

Anti-Trump? Not so much. Besides, I've praised some choices he picked in his administration. (Uh... perhaps the picks Kybkh hates.)

Okeefenokee
Posts: 12950
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:27 pm
Location: The Great Place

Re: CS 317 Shades of Grey

Post by Okeefenokee » Mon Nov 13, 2017 12:33 am

Speaker to Animals wrote:
Hwen Hoshino wrote:
Speaker to Animals wrote:It's just damned peculiar how feminists and the earlier suffragettes did so much to secure privileges for women but nowhere have they seemed to actually secure any corresponding obligations for women. Even more peculiar is how they are so bloody rabid about enforcing men's newfound obligations to women without any corresponding rights and privileges. We have to pay for their children but we have no rights to our own children. We have to go fight and die for the pointless wars they vote for, but don't we dare suggest they should have to serve too. It's almost as if they were never really about equality before the law at all but, rather, unjustifiable privileges for women to the detriment of men..

Women want freedom from the kinds of labor they find unflattering, such as sewage and logging, and they want guaranteed access to the kinds of high-status labor they find flattering on them, such as CEOs, but they definitely don't want any of the accountability that goes with it. When they fuck that up too, it's called the "glass cliff" and men are to be held accountable for the failures of women.

There is no balance to be had with people like this. You either stand up for gender equality or you do not and -- news flash -- feminists and any other of the many far-left cultural marxists do NOT in any way stand for equality before the law. Not now, not years ago, and not any time in the future.
Nobody really gets to vote for wars.

Nonsense. 65.8 million people voted for a war with Russia last year. 54% of women voted for it, and 100% of them would not have had to actually fight the fucking thing.
This.
GrumpyCatFace wrote:Dumb slut partied too hard and woke up in a weird house. Ran out the door, weeping for her failed life choices, concerned townsfolk notes her appearance and alerted the fuzz.

viewtopic.php?p=60751#p60751

Okeefenokee
Posts: 12950
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:27 pm
Location: The Great Place

Re: CS 317 Shades of Grey

Post by Okeefenokee » Mon Nov 13, 2017 12:36 am

ssu wrote:
Speaker to Animals wrote:I think they knew vaguely enough that they were voting for hostilities with Russia. The bitch hardly made a secret of it.
Oh boy, are the Russians good at what they do. Can't do nothing but praise them. Knew they were good, but this awesome?
Yeah, it was the Russians that got her to lie so much twenty years ago that Norm got fired for calling her out on it, all so they could steal the 2016 election.

Take your tinfiol hat off, reshape it into a pipe, and smoke enough crack to kill you, you fucking moron.

GrumpyCatFace wrote:Dumb slut partied too hard and woke up in a weird house. Ran out the door, weeping for her failed life choices, concerned townsfolk notes her appearance and alerted the fuzz.

viewtopic.php?p=60751#p60751

Hwen Hoshino
Posts: 1819
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 1:52 am

Re: CS 317 Shades of Grey

Post by Hwen Hoshino » Mon Nov 13, 2017 2:15 am

Speaker to Animals wrote:
Hwen Hoshino wrote:
Speaker to Animals wrote:

Nonsense. 65.8 million people voted for a war with Russia last year. 54% of women voted for it, and 100% of them would not have had to actually fight the fucking thing.
You think these people are informed enough... :hand:

They do not know enough about Foreign Policy to know what voting for candidate x or z means...

I think they knew vaguely enough that they were voting for hostilities with Russia. The bitch hardly made a secret of it. Most of those women voted for her because she too has a vagina, which in my opinion was probably the ultimate refutation of women's suffrage that ever occurred. I am not sure I can ever forget what I saw last year. You cannot unsee it.

If it was made explicitly clear that war with Russia means all those women will get conscripted and have to fight a horrific war somewhere they don't want to be, I doubt they'd vote for her, though. Women don't typically want to do shit. They want the benefits without the obligations and work.
Man are better... They voted for Obama cause he was black...


Nukedog wrote:Ssu is the most anti-Trump/populist and anti-Russia poster I've ever seen. And I've seen a lot.
trust me, you are a more exotic flower.

Okeefenokee wrote:
Speaker to Animals wrote:
Hwen Hoshino wrote: Nobody really gets to vote for wars.

Nonsense. 65.8 million people voted for a war with Russia last year. 54% of women voted for it, and 100% of them would not have had to actually fight the fucking thing.
This.
People are retards and do not vote on Foreign Policy on presidential elections.

User avatar
SuburbanFarmer
Posts: 25283
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
Location: Ohio

Re: CS 317 Shades of Grey

Post by SuburbanFarmer » Mon Nov 13, 2017 11:51 am

...which is ironic, as that’s the MAIN JOB of a POTUS.
SJWs are a natural consequence of corporatism.

Formerly GrumpyCatFace

https://youtu.be/CYbT8-rSqo0