North Korea News

Zlaxer
Posts: 5377
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 5:04 am

Re: North Korea News

Post by Zlaxer » Tue Sep 05, 2017 7:51 am

GloryofGreece wrote:
The Conservative wrote:
Zlaxer wrote:

Fuck China - this is their fucking mess - they're the ones giving tech and economic support....they love pressing the thorn in our side.....China won't do shit....they know they have no chance of besting us in a conventional conflict.....and they still subscribe to MAD....
Do they? I mean they are using a country to play dirty bll with us, that is right next to theirs if we behead the leadership, or use unconventional means to take out their leadership, do you think China would stay quiet? I mean their biggest thorn in our side as you put it had its head cut off.
Isnt that one of the reasons we never destroyed Korea with nuclear bombs in the early 1950s, because China/Russia would retaliate and were threatening that very thing?

We should have nuked the fuck out of the DRPK and told the PRC to back the fuck off or they'd be next. Would not have the problem that we have today.

User avatar
The Conservative
Posts: 14797
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am

Re: North Korea News

Post by The Conservative » Tue Sep 05, 2017 8:00 am

Zlaxer wrote:
The Conservative wrote:
Zlaxer wrote:

Fuck China - this is their fucking mess - they're the ones giving tech and economic support....they love pressing the thorn in our side.....China won't do shit....they know they have no chance of besting us in a conventional conflict.....and they still subscribe to MAD....
Do they? I mean they are using a country to play dirty ball with us, that is right next to theirs if we behead the leadership, or use unconventional means to take out their leadership, do you think China would stay quiet? I mean their biggest thorn in our side as you put it had its head cut off.
Who cut the head off? last time I checked the Jonginator was still at the helm.
You are a little behind the ball, aren't you?

Stories are starting to bubble up that Trump has authorized the assassination of Kim Jong Un.
#NotOneRedCent

User avatar
SilverEagle
Posts: 2421
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 11:07 am

Re: North Korea News

Post by SilverEagle » Tue Sep 05, 2017 8:08 am

Zlaxer wrote:
GloryofGreece wrote:
The Conservative wrote:
Do they? I mean they are using a country to play dirty bll with us, that is right next to theirs if we behead the leadership, or use unconventional means to take out their leadership, do you think China would stay quiet? I mean their biggest thorn in our side as you put it had its head cut off.
Isnt that one of the reasons we never destroyed Korea with nuclear bombs in the early 1950s, because China/Russia would retaliate and were threatening that very thing?

We should have nuked the fuck out of the DRPK and told the PRC to back the fuck off or they'd be next. Would not have the problem that we have today.
Like StA said on the last page, we should've taken the DPRK out ten years ago. Now there are tens of millions of lives at risk because of DPRK nukes and rapidly advancing delivery systems. China keeps feeding them Tech which is why they are consistently beating our projects of where they're capabilities should be and we are sitting on our hands like it's going to get better at some point? The sooner we strike, the better and trust me I'm not a hawk that wants to go to war at ALL but the longer we F around the great the risk grows and instead of foreign lives at risk it will be ours that are at risk.
There is a time for good men to do bad things.

For fuck sake, 1984 is NOT an instruction manual!

:character-bowser: __________ :character-mario: :character-luigi:

User avatar
The Conservative
Posts: 14797
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am

Re: North Korea News

Post by The Conservative » Tue Sep 05, 2017 8:29 am

SilverEagle wrote:
Zlaxer wrote:
GloryofGreece wrote: Isnt that one of the reasons we never destroyed Korea with nuclear bombs in the early 1950s, because China/Russia would retaliate and were threatening that very thing?

We should have nuked the fuck out of the DRPK and told the PRC to back the fuck off or they'd be next. Would not have the problem that we have today.
Like StA said on the last page, we should've taken the DPRK out ten years ago. Now there are tens of millions of lives at risk because of DPRK nukes and rapidly advancing delivery systems. China keeps feeding them Tech which is why they are consistently beating our projects of where they're capabilities should be and we are sitting on our hands like it's going to get better at some point? The sooner we strike, the better and trust me I'm not a hawk that wants to go to war at ALL but the longer we F around the great the risk grows and instead of foreign lives at risk it will be ours that are at risk.
I'm all for a strategic strike to make their own systems blow up in their faces.
#NotOneRedCent

User avatar
SuburbanFarmer
Posts: 25287
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
Location: Ohio

Re: North Korea News

Post by SuburbanFarmer » Tue Sep 05, 2017 8:41 am

The Conservative wrote:
Zlaxer wrote:
The Conservative wrote:
Do they? I mean they are using a country to play dirty ball with us, that is right next to theirs if we behead the leadership, or use unconventional means to take out their leadership, do you think China would stay quiet? I mean their biggest thorn in our side as you put it had its head cut off.
Who cut the head off? last time I checked the Jonginator was still at the helm.
You are a little behind the ball, aren't you?

Stories are starting to bubble up that Trump has authorized the assassination of Kim Jong Un.
As expected. The only way out of this shit is to cut the head off.
SJWs are a natural consequence of corporatism.

Formerly GrumpyCatFace

https://youtu.be/CYbT8-rSqo0

User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18718
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: North Korea News

Post by Montegriffo » Tue Sep 05, 2017 8:52 am

How things change. Most people here were anti intervention a few months ago. Now everyone wants to nuke NK and bring about regime change. Who's next? Pakistan has nukes and hates the US let's bomb them next. What about Iran? They have a nuclear weapons program, put them on the list too.
After all America has a reputation as the world's bully to uphold.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image

User avatar
The Conservative
Posts: 14797
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am

Re: North Korea News

Post by The Conservative » Tue Sep 05, 2017 9:04 am

Montegriffo wrote:How things change. Most people here were anti intervention a few months ago. Now everyone wants to nuke NK and bring about regime change. Who's next? Pakistan has nukes and hates the US let's bomb them next. What about Iran? They have a nuclear weapons program, put them on the list too.
After all America has a reputation as the world's bully to uphold.
You realize NK broke the Armistance back on April 28, 1994, right? They broke the agreement, which means that US technically has full right to go after NK to do what is required to remove the threat of NK against the US and the world per say.

Now you can disagree with that if you wish, but lets be real here... you aren't going to care.
#NotOneRedCent

Zlaxer
Posts: 5377
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 5:04 am

Re: North Korea News

Post by Zlaxer » Tue Sep 05, 2017 9:12 am

Montegriffo wrote:How things change. Most people here were anti intervention a few months ago. Now everyone wants to nuke NK and bring about regime change. Who's next? Pakistan has nukes and hates the US let's bomb them next. What about Iran? They have a nuclear weapons program, put them on the list too.
After all America has a reputation as the world's bully to uphold.

I'm still against military intervention - Force the PRC to stop it via EMBAEGO and/or threaten to allow Japan to arm the fuck up. Problem solved without US bloodshed.

User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18718
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: North Korea News

Post by Montegriffo » Tue Sep 05, 2017 9:15 am

On the contrary, I am going to care if hundreds of thousands of people are going to die from being nuked by the US as a preemptive measure. Your disregard for the lives of innocent and oppressed peoples is nauseating. Better get that wall built quickly, there are going to be a lot of refugees heading your way if NK is bombed into a nuclear wasteland.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image

User avatar
Kazmyr
Posts: 811
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:33 am

Re: North Korea News

Post by Kazmyr » Tue Sep 05, 2017 9:18 am

GrumpyCatFace wrote:
The Conservative wrote:
Zlaxer wrote:
Who cut the head off? last time I checked the Jonginator was still at the helm.
You are a little behind the ball, aren't you?

Stories are starting to bubble up that Trump has authorized the assassination of Kim Jong Un.
As expected. The only way out of this shit is to cut the head off.
I thought we covered this some pages back?
Smitty-48 wrote:Oh, and you know how ya'll are saying just neptune spear Kim Jong Un and presto it all falls to pieces?

Tell you right now, Kim Jong Un is alive and Kim Il Sung is dead, but they still run it like "Respected Generalissimo Kim Il Sung" is the state and Kim Jong Un is just like his little deputy, the cult of the personality still flows from Sung, Un is just his viceroy.

When they have all the kids in the "Children's Union" reciting the brainwashing, all day everday, it's mostly Sung related, not Un. The Kim being dead, really doesn't impede this thing at all actually.

Even if you could neptune spear Un, they'd just put three pictures up on the wall and carry on as if all three were just running things from on high in Juche heaven, the actual power behind this throne is opaque, but it doesn't actually need a Kim to be alive to invoke the Kim 24-7-3-6-5.

Kim Il Sung is like Jesus in the Bible Belt, he's everywhere, he's the main event, Kim Il Sung this and Kim Il Sung that, in comparison Un gets very little play, and these days Kim Jong Il barely gets mentioned at all.

This regime is not a fat kid with a funny haircut, that's just a front, but they would carry on with Kim Il Sung as a cardboard cutout regardless even if Un was reduced to the third picture on the wall. Frankly I think they'd prefer it that way, which is why Un is looking over his shoulder at all times.
Martin Hash wrote:Liberty allows people to get their jollies any way they want. Just don't expect to masturbate with my lotion.