Speaker to Animals wrote:Mueller was the one colluding with Russia for money, but whatever advances the narrative. lmfao
Exactly .
Proof now coming out on coordinated government coup which included the Obama Whitehouse
Speaker to Animals wrote:Mueller was the one colluding with Russia for money, but whatever advances the narrative. lmfao
GrumpyCatFace wrote:Dumb slut partied too hard and woke up in a weird house. Ran out the door, weeping for her failed life choices, concerned townsfolk notes her appearance and alerted the fuzz.
viewtopic.php?p=60751#p60751
Today the British press reports that the Skripal father and daughter pair were poisoned “from their front door”. They do that with the same level of certainty that just a few days ago they used in telling us they were poisoned through the air vents of the dad’s BMW. Exact same story, just a different location. And that’s after a by now long sequence of headlines that claimed it had happened inside the home, or in a bar, a pizzeria, or on the parkbench they were ostensibly ‘found’ on.
What that headline above, and all others on the topic that came before it, tells me is that evidently the hundreds of ‘experts’ involved in the case have not yet been able to locate the ‘nerve agent’. They’re still just guessing, even 25 days after the incident is supposed to have happened. How would that be done? I have no idea, but I’m surely thinking that after almost 4 weeks it’s essentially a pure guessing game, and nothing more than that.
Here’s my theory, borne off my gullibility in all its glory: Theresa May and her government have been stumbling from disaster to catastrophe over the Brexit calamity for months now, and they needed some relief. But they themselves are not smart enough to provide it. So someone got it for them.
Comes to my mind the first assassination of a defected Russian intelligence officer. In that case it was just by accident, a visiting scientist overhearing a conversation, that the British could trace the poisoning to Polonium 210. Later it wouldn't have been possible to trace it.Smitty-48 wrote:To answer his question as to how the nerve agent wouldn't be killing people long after the fact, N series nerve agents, like most military nerve agents, are so called "non-persistent", in that they break down relatively quickly after they are used, the purpose being so that your troops can move in and seize the territory in the wake of your chemical bombardment without being killed by your own nerve agent.
As the British were able to trace the assassination of Litvinenko back to Lugovoi via the radioactive trail left by the polonium, it seems Novichock was plausibly chosen to hit Skripal because it would not leave such a trace. Polonium-210 decays into lead by alpha particle emission in 138 days, whereas Novichock-5 would break down in a matter of hours.ssu wrote:Comes to my mind the first assassination of a defected Russian intelligence officer. In that case it was just by accident, a visiting scientist overhearing a conversation, that the British could trace the poisoning to Polonium 210. Later it wouldn't have been possible to trace it.Smitty-48 wrote:To answer his question as to how the nerve agent wouldn't be killing people long after the fact, N series nerve agents, like most military nerve agents, are so called "non-persistent", in that they break down relatively quickly after they are used, the purpose being so that your troops can move in and seize the territory in the wake of your chemical bombardment without being killed by your own nerve agent.
Makes total sense.Smitty-48 wrote:As the British were able to trace the assassination of Litvinenko back to Lugovoi via the radioactive trail left by the polonium, it seems Novichock was plausibly chosen to hit Skripal because it would not leave such a trace. Polonium-210 decays into lead by alpha particle emission in 138 days, whereas Novichock-5 would break down in a matter of hours.