You must be scared, that is something you wouldn't say if the shoe was on the other foot. After all you dont believe in freedom of speech. So you already support a one party state, those allowed to speak vs those you don't.Montegriffo wrote: ↑Sun Sep 30, 2018 6:34 amNothing quite like a one party state to guarantee your liberty.
Trump's SCOTUS
-
- Posts: 7978
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
-
- Posts: 18716
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
You can just fuck off until you apologise for the shitty thing you said about my father.clubgop wrote: ↑Sun Sep 30, 2018 6:43 amYou must be scared, that is something you wouldn't say if the shoe was on the other foot. After all you dont believe in freedom of speech. So you already support a one party state, those allowed to speak vs those you don't.Montegriffo wrote: ↑Sun Sep 30, 2018 6:34 amNothing quite like a one party state to guarantee your liberty.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
- Posts: 7978
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
So you dont have an argument in response, noted.Montegriffo wrote: ↑Sun Sep 30, 2018 6:45 amYou can just fuck off until you apologise for the shitty thing you said about my father.clubgop wrote: ↑Sun Sep 30, 2018 6:43 amYou must be scared, that is something you wouldn't say if the shoe was on the other foot. After all you dont believe in freedom of speech. So you already support a one party state, those allowed to speak vs those you don't.Montegriffo wrote: ↑Sun Sep 30, 2018 6:34 amNothing quite like a one party state to guarantee your liberty.
-
- Posts: 18716
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
Destroying the party you dislike and installing one more to your liking.Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Sun Sep 30, 2018 6:37 amThere is no way our governmental system could sustain a single party. Destroying the democrats does not mean one party state. It just means destroying that criminal organization for good and allowing the left to start over with something less evil.Montegriffo wrote: ↑Sun Sep 30, 2018 6:34 amNothing quite like a one party state to guarantee your liberty.
Doesn’t sound authoritarian at all.
Sieg heil.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
Montegriffo wrote: ↑Sun Sep 30, 2018 6:48 amDestroying the party you dislike and installing one more to your liking.Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Sun Sep 30, 2018 6:37 amThere is no way our governmental system could sustain a single party. Destroying the democrats does not mean one party state. It just means destroying that criminal organization for good and allowing the left to start over with something less evil.Montegriffo wrote: ↑Sun Sep 30, 2018 6:34 amNothing quite like a one party state to guarantee your liberty.
Doesn’t sound authoritarian at all.
Sieg heil.
I guarantee what would replace the democratic party would not be to my liking. But it hopefully would be less evil.
Just going by demographics, it's going to be a globalist/socialist coalition without white men. It's going to be cancer no matter what. But what we saw last week has to stop.
-
- Posts: 18665
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:02 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
That IS what replaced the Democratic Party.Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Sun Sep 30, 2018 6:50 amMontegriffo wrote: ↑Sun Sep 30, 2018 6:48 amDestroying the party you dislike and installing one more to your liking.Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Sun Sep 30, 2018 6:37 am
There is no way our governmental system could sustain a single party. Destroying the democrats does not mean one party state. It just means destroying that criminal organization for good and allowing the left to start over with something less evil.
Doesn’t sound authoritarian at all.
Sieg heil.
I guarantee what would replace the democratic party would not be to my liking. But it hopefully would be less evil.
Just going by demographics, it's going to be a globalist/socialist coalition without white men. It's going to be cancer no matter what. But what we saw last week has to stop.
Shamedia, Shamdemic, Shamucation, Shamlection, Shamconomy & Shamate Change
-
- Posts: 7978
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
Martin Hash wrote: ↑Sun Sep 30, 2018 6:55 amThat IS what replaced the Democratic Party.Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Sun Sep 30, 2018 6:50 amMontegriffo wrote: ↑Sun Sep 30, 2018 6:48 am
Destroying the party you dislike and installing one more to your liking.
Doesn’t sound authoritarian at all.
Sieg heil.
I guarantee what would replace the democratic party would not be to my liking. But it hopefully would be less evil.
Just going by demographics, it's going to be a globalist/socialist coalition without white men. It's going to be cancer no matter what. But what we saw last week has to stop.
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
He spent several pages shilling for their side with the abortion shit, though. Most people are only half checked-out of the evil right now.
We just saw liberal women making rape hoaxes in order to protect their ability to murder their own children in their wombs. This entire farce was about pro-aborts trying to protect their evil industry.
People really need to step back and look at degeneracy for what it is, and realize we are all invested in it emotionally to varying degrees. It's actually pretty bad.
We just saw liberal women making rape hoaxes in order to protect their ability to murder their own children in their wombs. This entire farce was about pro-aborts trying to protect their evil industry.
People really need to step back and look at degeneracy for what it is, and realize we are all invested in it emotionally to varying degrees. It's actually pretty bad.
-
- Posts: 3657
- Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 11:15 am
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
Couple quick thoughts:
If Devil's Triangle really does mean 2 on 1, do we now need a #methree movement?
During the hearings Senator Whitehouse denied ever playing quarters. I want an FBI investigation into that. I think he's lying.
If Devil's Triangle really does mean 2 on 1, do we now need a #methree movement?
During the hearings Senator Whitehouse denied ever playing quarters. I want an FBI investigation into that. I think he's lying.
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
He was not advertising homo shit in the yearbook. Come on.