Hanarchy Montanarchy wrote:I don't think that no one has considered that NK operates differently than the US. We just can't realistically expect to convince the world that we have a good reason to initiate a first strike. This isn't just American hubris. I just hope all that quick draw technology we've been promising to get right actually gets sorted before NK missile crisis.
Obviously, any actual nuclear exchange is less that ideal. And you are right... American's would probably take it harder for not seeing our dead as martyrs for a great leader.
Well, first of all, I am looking at this from the point of view of an American Commander-in-Chief, and If I was the American CinC, the opinions of the rest of the world take a back seat to the lives of millions of Americans, and the security of the CONUS against a limited yet none the less devastating thermonuclear strike.
As CinC, I would simply redefine the paradigm, I would take action to bring the North Korean threat down, before it reached the threshold of Redwings over the CONUS, and I would use the B61's in a limited and focussed counrterforce operation, no fail mission, to get it all on the first pass.
Then I would simply deal with the rest of the world straight up about it, and I am confident that the American allies and partners whom I truly could rely on, would not forsake America, and certainly not turn on her with malice.
Those who did forsake and turn on her with malice, those who lined up as the apologists and defenders of the abomination in Pyongyang with hydrogen bombs at its disposal?
Don't need them with me, don't want them with me, and they would in fact, be making a big mistake to bet against me and the American people, never bet against the Eagles with Thunderbolts in Talons Grapsed, if you know what's good for you.
As for ballistic missile defense? It would get some, but it wouldn't get em all, and as American CinC, I'm not betting the CONUS on BMD, and I'm not prepared to acccept, even one hydrogen bomb getting through, never mind a half dozen.