You think a woman with a 130 IQ and a 2/10 on the looks scale is a diversity hire?Speaker to Animals wrote:If you guys want to bang old affirmative action hires, that's your business.
I'd be the one to judge with my fucked up proclivities for feminists.
You guys have too much time on your hands. [NSFW]
-
- Posts: 1347
- Joined: Thu Mar 23, 2017 3:00 am
Re: You guys have too much time on your hands. [NSFW]
Thy praise or dispraise is to me alike:
One doth not stroke me, nor the other strike.
-Ben Johnson
One doth not stroke me, nor the other strike.
-Ben Johnson
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: You guys have too much time on your hands. [NSFW]
jediuser598 wrote:You think a woman with a 130 IQ and a 2/10 on the looks scale is a diversity hire?Speaker to Animals wrote:If you guys want to bang old affirmative action hires, that's your business.
I'd be the one to judge with my fucked up proclivities for feminists.
LOL
I very much doubt she has a 130 IQ. Statistically, there are only very few women with that kind of IQ.
Most women in these positions are play-acting. That's why corporations and whatever else they lead tend to collapse. Then women blame it on the "glass waterfall" or whatever they call it now.
There are precious few actual genius women out there. There really aren't that many genius men either, but statistically probably about twice as many male geniuses to female geniuses. You can see this fact on any reputable chart of IQ distributions divided by sex.
Last edited by Speaker to Animals on Mon Feb 26, 2018 11:12 am, edited 2 times in total.
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: You guys have too much time on your hands. [NSFW]
She's a liberal moonbat, hard pass, not just because she isn't attractive either, there are boatloads of reasons to not be into a woman like that.jediuser598 wrote:You think a woman with a 130 IQ and a 2/10 on the looks scale is a diversity hire?Speaker to Animals wrote:If you guys want to bang old affirmative action hires, that's your business.
I'd be the one to judge with my fucked up proclivities for feminists.
*yip*
-
- Posts: 1347
- Joined: Thu Mar 23, 2017 3:00 am
Re: You guys have too much time on your hands. [NSFW]
Not talking specifically about RBG or Sotomayor, talking just in general.
If a woman has 130 IQ and is a 2/10 in the looks department, you think she's not worth your time? You wouldn't date her?
If a woman has 130 IQ and is a 2/10 in the looks department, you think she's not worth your time? You wouldn't date her?
Thy praise or dispraise is to me alike:
One doth not stroke me, nor the other strike.
-Ben Johnson
One doth not stroke me, nor the other strike.
-Ben Johnson
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: You guys have too much time on your hands. [NSFW]
jediuser598 wrote:Not talking specifically about RBG or Sotomayor, talking just in general.
If a woman has 130 IQ and is a 2/10 in the looks department, you think she's not worth your time? You wouldn't date her?
A woman who actually has an IQ of 130 is going to be traditional most likely and married up early. I am telling you, statistically, your odds of finding a single woman with that IQ are pretty dismal. You're projecting male attributes onto women, apparently. They aren't like us.
If you want somebody you can have deep philosophical conversations with that actually mean something, then you might as well go gay. Get involved in ballet.
Last edited by Speaker to Animals on Mon Feb 26, 2018 11:16 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: You guys have too much time on your hands. [NSFW]
Correct, gotta be attractive, can't date a chick I'm not attracted to. I don't care how smart a 2/10 is, she can date you instead. Super smart can't overcome completely unattractive, that's a dealbreaker.jediuser598 wrote:Not talking specifically about RBG or Sotomayor, talking just in general.
If a woman has 130 IQ and is a 2/10 in the looks department, you think she's not worth your time? You wouldn't date her?
/shrugs
*yip*
-
- Posts: 25283
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
Re: You guys have too much time on your hands. [NSFW]
2/10 is pretty far down the scale. That's just above a RBG, or Downs Syndrome
5/10 necessary for intellect to be considered. But intellect could overpower 90% of the range from 6-10
5/10 necessary for intellect to be considered. But intellect could overpower 90% of the range from 6-10
Last edited by SuburbanFarmer on Mon Feb 26, 2018 11:27 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 1347
- Joined: Thu Mar 23, 2017 3:00 am
Re: You guys have too much time on your hands. [NSFW]
Thy praise or dispraise is to me alike:
One doth not stroke me, nor the other strike.
-Ben Johnson
One doth not stroke me, nor the other strike.
-Ben Johnson
-
- Posts: 1347
- Joined: Thu Mar 23, 2017 3:00 am
Re: You guys have too much time on your hands. [NSFW]
Tell me when.
3/10 130 IQ
4/10 130 IQ
5/10 130 IQ
6/10 130 IQ
7/10 130 IQ
At what point would you guys date such a gal?
3/10 130 IQ
4/10 130 IQ
5/10 130 IQ
6/10 130 IQ
7/10 130 IQ
At what point would you guys date such a gal?
Thy praise or dispraise is to me alike:
One doth not stroke me, nor the other strike.
-Ben Johnson
One doth not stroke me, nor the other strike.
-Ben Johnson
-
- Posts: 25283
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
Re: You guys have too much time on your hands. [NSFW]
Sticking with my 5/10 standard. Below that, you're talking about a 2am hookup, that you're desperately trying to forget forever after.jediuser598 wrote:Tell me when.
3/10 130 IQ
4/10 130 IQ
5/10 130 IQ
6/10 130 IQ
7/10 130 IQ
At what point would you guys date such a gal?