THE AMERICAN PEOPLE DON'T GIVE A FUCK!!!

[Okeefenokee]

Dude, you need a better example. Google something; this concept has been around a long time and all the arguments have been made before.

If per capita rates of crimes are equal between a town and city, but the city has ten times the population density, the city and the town are not the same. Living in the city you are going to have ten times more crime around than you would in the town.

If you need to google something to understand that, bye.

Are you not normalizing for area? Dude, you have to normalize if you're going to multiply unit vectors.

You're asking the wrong person.

[SuburbanFarmer]

If per capita rates of crimes are equal between a town and city, but the city has ten times the population density, the city and the town are not the same. Living in the city you are going to have ten times more crime around than you would in the town.

If you need to google something to understand that, bye.

Are you not normalizing for area? Dude, you have to normalize if you're going to multiply unit vectors.

You're asking the wrong person.

Clearly.

He's telling you that while you're 'around 10x more criminals', you're also among 10x more potential victims. Your risk is the same, all else being equal.

[Okeefenokee]

Are you not normalizing for area? Dude, you have to normalize if you're going to multiply unit vectors.

You're asking the wrong person.

Clearly.

He's telling you that while you're 'around 10x more criminals', you're also among 10x more potential victims. Your risk is the same, all else being equal.

Crime is not a commodity that is consumed once enacted. This is more of your batshit economics applied to crime.

[SuburbanFarmer]

You're asking the wrong person.

Clearly.

He's telling you that while you're 'around 10x more criminals', you're also among 10x more potential victims. Your risk is the same, all else being equal.

Crime is not a commodity that is consumed once enacted. This is more of your batshit economics applied to crime.

Within an equal rate of it happening, yeah, it kind of is.

If the crime rate is the same between 2 places, then there could be 10x more criminals, 10x more victims, but there must also be 10x more people that don't experience that crime.

The risk. Is. The. Same.

[Okeefenokee]

Clearly.

He's telling you that while you're 'around 10x more criminals', you're also among 10x more potential victims. Your risk is the same, all else being equal.

Crime is not a commodity that is consumed once enacted. This is more of your batshit economics applied to crime.

Within an equal rate of it happening, yeah, it kind of is.

If the crime rate is the same between 2 places, then there could be 10x more criminals, 10x more victims, and 10x more people that don't experience that crime.

The risk. Is. The. Same.

No it isn't. And your black is white, hot is cold batshit relativism isn't going to fly here. Having ten times more crime around you isn't lessened by the fact that there are also ten times more other people around you. Crime is not a commodity that can only be enacted upon one person, and then lost. You want this to be true so you can continue with your baseless claim that this,



is the same as this,



When it isn't. And any sane person would know that what you are suggesting is horseshit nonsense. You are trying to argue that a person is just as likely to be the victim of a crime in a crime infested ghetto as they are in a quiet country town. It's nonsense.

[SuburbanFarmer]

Crime is not a commodity that is consumed once enacted. This is more of your batshit economics applied to crime.

Within an equal rate of it happening, yeah, it kind of is.

If the crime rate is the same between 2 places, then there could be 10x more criminals, 10x more victims, and 10x more people that don't experience that crime.

The risk. Is. The. Same.

No it isn't. And your black is white, hot is cold batshit relativism isn't going to fly here. Having ten times more crime around you isn't lessened by the fact that there are also ten times more other people around you. Crime is not a commodity that can only be enacted upon one person, and then lost. You want this to be true so you can continue with your baseless claim that this,



is the same as this,



When it isn't. And any sane person would know that what you are suggesting is horseshit nonsense. You are trying to argue that a person is just as likely to be the victim of a crime in a crime infested ghetto as they are in a quiet country town. It's nonsense.

I'm guessing that those 2 places don't have the same crime rate.

If they do, then it's pretty clear that there are other factors at play in the local decor. One wonders....

[Okeefenokee]

I'm guessing that those 2 places don't have the same crime rate.

If they do, then it's pretty clear that there are other factors at play in the local decor. One wonders....

That's a bold guess. I've been reading for a couple of pages that the crime rates outside of cities are the same as they are inside.

[SuburbanFarmer]

I'm guessing that those 2 places don't have the same crime rate.

If they do, then it's pretty clear that there are other factors at play in the local decor. One wonders....

That's a bold guess. I've been reading for a couple of pages that the crime rates outside of cities are the same as they are inside.

Perhaps there are other factors at play then.

[Okeefenokee]

I'm guessing that those 2 places don't have the same crime rate.

If they do, then it's pretty clear that there are other factors at play in the local decor. One wonders....

That's a bold guess. I've been reading for a couple of pages that the crime rates outside of cities are the same as they are inside.

Perhaps there are other factors at play then.

You'll never figure them out if you continue to believe that crime rates are the same everywhere, yet there's some mystery factor at play that causes some places to become hellscapes, while others magically conceal their rampant crime.

[Fife]

Don't be so harsh Okee. Walk a mile, and all that jazz.