What's the difference? Trump is Kennedy/Johnson/Nixon/Ford/Carter/Reagan/Bush/Clinton/Bush/Obama 11.0 on that shit anyway. Amirite?StCapps wrote:What's more likely, this is merely saber rattling, or this is the next Vietnam?Fife wrote:Have you ever heard of Vietnam?
Meanwhile in Iraq & Syria
-
- Posts: 15157
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:47 am
Re: Meanwhile in Iraq & Syria
-
- Posts: 7571
- Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2017 7:54 pm
Re: Meanwhile in Iraq & Syria
Why does the west have such a hard on for Assad? This is like Saddam 2.0. The man is a piece of shit, but he is the only one holding that country together. We still think in the West that you can simply remove an evil leader, and that good will follow. What always ends up happening is replacing a centralized evil with a chaotic diffused evil that is often more destructive. You could make a good case that the Syrian situation is a direct result of the Iraq war and this toxic magical thinking. Getting rid of Assad is like taking the shit out of the toilet and putting it on the floor.
Shikata ga nai
-
- Posts: 12950
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:27 pm
- Location: The Great Place
Re: Meanwhile in Iraq & Syria
What is the media?heydaralon wrote:Why does the west have such a hard on for Assad? This is like Saddam 2.0. The man is a piece of shit, but he is the only one holding that country together. We still think in the West that you can simply remove an evil leader, and that good will follow. What always ends up happening is replacing a centralized evil with a chaotic diffused evil that is often more destructive. You could make a good case that the Syrian situation is a direct result of the Iraq war and this toxic magical thinking. Getting rid of Assad is like taking the shit out of the toilet and putting it on the floor.
I'll take fake news for one thousand.
GrumpyCatFace wrote:Dumb slut partied too hard and woke up in a weird house. Ran out the door, weeping for her failed life choices, concerned townsfolk notes her appearance and alerted the fuzz.
viewtopic.php?p=60751#p60751
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: Meanwhile in Iraq & Syria
Yeah they are depthy and dont have a true lockdown pair to anchor it, but that's better than Seth Jones and a bag of pucks. Columbus might have a better "top pair" but they don't have a better defense.Smitty-48 wrote:See, the thing about that D, it's an example of how the Caps are built for the regular season but not the playoffs, it's a deep D, but with no real top paring, so they can carry you along for the regular season, but when it comes playoff time, all that really matters is the top paring, and Seth Jones and Zach Werenski are better than John Carlson and Matt Niskanen, not as experienced, but I wouldn't trade Columbus' top pair for Washington's, Washington doesn't have a big horse on the back end, which is why Kris Letang has two cups and Washington has none.StCapps wrote:Yeah and you could beat up on the Columbus defense even easier, because they suck a whole lot more than Washington does on defense. Not only that but they are the much better offensive team as well. Would rather face Columbus honestly sounds like trolling, that's crazy talk.Smitty-48 wrote:
?
John Carlson
Matt Niskanen
Karl Alzner
Kevin Shattenkirk
Dmitry Orlov
Brooks Orpik
Nate Schmidt
That ain't that great a D, all those guys don't add up to a Keith and Seabrook, it's actually very beatable D, I think the Leafs could get to them.
Last edited by StCapps on Thu Apr 06, 2017 5:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.
*yip*
-
- Posts: 36399
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am
Re: Meanwhile in Iraq & Syria
It's not a bag o' pucks in Columbus, Jones and Werenski are better than anybody on the Wash D, and it's not like Orlov and Alzner are better than Jack Johnson and David Savard, D to D, Columbus has the better top paring, after the top paring, it's about the same, hence, Columbus has the better D.StCapps wrote:Yeah they are depthy and dont have a true lockdown pair to anchor it, but that's better the Seth Jones and a bag of pucks. Columbus might have a better "top pair" but they don't have a better defense.Smitty-48 wrote:See, the thing about that D, it's an example of how the Caps are built for the regular season but not the playoffs, it's a deep D, but with no real top paring, so they can carry you along for the regular season, but when it comes playoff time, all that really matters is the top paring, and Seth Jones and Zach Werenski are better than John Carlson and Matt Niskanen, not as experienced, but I wouldn't trade Columbus' top pair for Washington's, Washington doesn't have a big horse on the back end, which is why Kris Letang has two cups and Washington has none.StCapps wrote:Yeah and you could beat up on the Columbus defense even easier, because they suck a whole lot more than Washington does on defense. Not only that but they are the much better offensive team as well. Would rather face Columbus honestly sounds like trolling, that's crazy talk.
There are plenty of defensemen in the league that I would covet for the Leafs, but not one of them is on the Caps; Carlson; meh. Niskanen; meh. Alzner; meh. Orlov; meh. Orpik; meh. Washington's D; a whole lotta meh.
Last edited by Smitty-48 on Thu Apr 06, 2017 5:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Nec Aspera Terrent
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: Meanwhile in Iraq & Syria
Werenski is overrated, Jones makes him look good. He wasn't anything special before Seth Jones got there, he was always overrated. Columbus has Seth Jones and a bag of pucks on defense, Washington has actual defensemen, though they are nothing special.Smitty-48 wrote:It's not a bag o' pucks in Columbus, Jones and Werenski are better than anybody on the Wash D, and it's not like Orlov and Alzner are better than Jack Johnson and David Savard, D to D, Columbus has the better top paring, after the top paring, it's about the same, hence, Columbus has the better D.StCapps wrote:Yeah they are depthy and dont have a true lockdown pair to anchor it, but that's better the Seth Jones and a bag of pucks. Columbus might have a better "top pair" but they don't have a better defense.Smitty-48 wrote:
See, the thing about that D, it's an example of how the Caps are built for the regular season but not the playoffs, it's a deep D, but with no real top paring, so they can carry you along for the regular season, but when it comes playoff time, all that really matters is the top paring, and Seth Jones and Zach Werenski are better than John Carlson and Matt Niskanen, not as experienced, but I wouldn't trade Columbus' top pair for Washington's, Washington doesn't have a big horse on the back end, which is why Kris Letang has two cups and Washington has none.
*yip*
-
- Posts: 36399
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am
Re: Meanwhile in Iraq & Syria
Still better than John Carlson, after John Carlson, who do the Caps have? Nobody, bunch o' meh.StCapps wrote:Werenski is overrated, Jones makes him look good. He wasn't anything special before Seth Jones got there, he was always overrated. Columbus has Seth Jones and a bag of pucks on defense, Washington has actual defensemen, though they are nothing special.Smitty-48 wrote:It's not a bag o' pucks in Columbus, Jones and Werenski are better than anybody on the Wash D, and it's not like Orlov and Alzner are better than Jack Johnson and David Savard, D to D, Columbus has the better top paring, after the top paring, it's about the same, hence, Columbus has the better D.StCapps wrote:Yeah they are depthy and dont have a true lockdown pair to anchor it, but that's better the Seth Jones and a bag of pucks. Columbus might have a better "top pair" but they don't have a better defense.
It's a two man team, take away Ovie and Backstrom, and the Caps wouldn't even make the playoffs.
Nec Aspera Terrent
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: Meanwhile in Iraq & Syria
Yeah but I know there names at least even the ones who don't play that much. Columbus is team no name on defense. I mean its obvious who is better in that regard.Smitty-48 wrote:Still better than John Carlson, after John Carlson, who do the Caps have? Nobody, bunch o' meh.StCapps wrote:Werenski is overrated, Jones makes him look good. He wasn't anything special before Seth Jones got there, he was always overrated. Columbus has Seth Jones and a bag of pucks on defense, Washington has actual defensemen, though they are nothing special.Smitty-48 wrote:
It's not a bag o' pucks in Columbus, Jones and Werenski are better than anybody on the Wash D, and it's not like Orlov and Alzner are better than Jack Johnson and David Savard, D to D, Columbus has the better top paring, after the top paring, it's about the same, hence, Columbus has the better D.
*yip*
-
- Posts: 36399
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am
Re: Meanwhile in Iraq & Syria
It's obvious that Washington's defense is mediocre and has been mediocre for years, the no name D is on Washington, because who would really want to swap their D for Washington's D? Nobody, it's all about Ovie and Backstrom, nobody wants anybody off the Caps D, because they actually suck, whereas every team in the league would covet Jones and Werenski, because they are actually a top paring for years to come.
Nec Aspera Terrent
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: Meanwhile in Iraq & Syria
It's still the worst part of the Caps team, but it's also the most improved part of their team over the last few years. Jones is dope, Werenski is good but overrated, the rest are a bag of pucks, including Jack Johnson. Washington has notably more depth on defense, this is pretty clear.Smitty-48 wrote:It's obvious that Washington's defense is mediocre and has been mediocre for years, the no name D is on Washington, because who would really want to swap their D for Washington's D? Nobody, it's all about Ovie and Backstrom, nobody wants anybody off the Caps D, because they actually suck, whereas every team in the league would covet Jones and Werenski, because they are actually a top paring for years to come.
*yip*