+3 yeah! Snip snap! Hahaha you're on fire tonight!Penner wrote:+2Martin Hash wrote:+1Kath wrote: Agreed.
How's that Obamacare Repeal Working Out For You?
-
- Posts: 26035
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:23 pm
Re: How's that Obamacare Repeal Working Out For You?
-
- Posts: 25287
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
Re: How's that Obamacare Repeal Working Out For You?
thread broken.
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: How's that Obamacare Repeal Working Out For You?
Nah, you are doing that enough in this thread for both of us, but you lack the self awareness to realize that this is all you.Speaker to Animals wrote:More like you are rambling on like a retard instead of walking away.
I'm just trolling, and you're taking shit way too seriously, ranting about, and spinning your wheels, that's what is happening. You're just being a retard, so somehow you haven't picked up on that yet, despite repeated attempts to make it as clear as possible that I'm just trolling you, you are still oblivious to what I am going on about.
Thanks for making the thread so entertaining by being so completely oblivious to extremely unsubtle hints, several of those hints a two year old probably could have picked up on, but not StA.
*yip*
-
- Posts: 15157
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:47 am
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: How's that Obamacare Repeal Working Out For You?
StCapps wrote:Nah, you are doing that enough in this thread for both of us, but you lack the self awareness to realize that this is all you.Speaker to Animals wrote:More like you are rambling on like a retard instead of walking away.
I'm just trolling, and you're taking shit way too seriously, ranting about, and spinning your wheels, that's what is happening. You're just being a retard, so somehow you haven't picked up on that yet, despite repeated attempts to make it as clear as possible that I'm just trolling you, you are still oblivious to what I am going on about.
Thanks for making the thread so entertaining by being so completely oblivious to extremely unsubtle hints, several of those hints a two year old probably could have picked up on, but not StA.
Oh, wow. I didn't think you'd come back here and double down on stupid. Remind me again why I thought some picture was literally Trump? That shit was funny.
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: How's that Obamacare Repeal Working Out For You?
Can't stop digging his own grave that's StA for you.
*yip*
-
- Posts: 18734
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:02 pm
Re: How's that Obamacare Repeal Working Out For You?
Once again I’ve read this $6 bil is only to subsidize the Co-pays. That would only be for people without Medicaid health in their State. For example, Street People in WA State have AppleCare which covers every cent of their healthcare whereas Poor people pay an Obamacare subsidized premium & a small Co-pay at each visit.Martin Hash wrote:I couldn’t tell what was cut? The co-pay? Can’t be the subsidy, it was only $6 billion.
Shamedia, Shamdemic, Shamucation, Shamlection, Shamconomy & Shamate Change
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: How's that Obamacare Repeal Working Out For You?
StCapps wrote:Can't stop digging his own grave that's StA for you.
You are the little man with a shovel in his hand, standing in a hole. It's surprising to me that you keep doubling down on this absurdity. Please explain how I was supposed to think a faceless, featureless effigy was literally a representation of Trump. You tried to attack me with some seriously retarded bullshit. You were probably high and didn't know any better. I was willing to give you the benefit of the doubt. I remain willing to give you the benefit of the doubt. I know you are a stubborn bastard (like most of us), and instead of assuming you are normally retarded, I just assumed you were high as fuck, posted something dumb, but are too stubborn to walk it back. Whatever.
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: How's that Obamacare Repeal Working Out For You?
Martin Hash wrote:Once again I’ve read this $6 bil is only to subsidize the Co-pays. That would only be for people without Medicaid health in their State. For example, Street People in WA State have AppleCare which covers every cent of their healthcare whereas Poor people pay an Obamacare subsidized premium & a small Co-pay at each visit.Martin Hash wrote:I couldn’t tell what was cut? The co-pay? Can’t be the subsidy, it was only $6 billion.
The GOP is making a huge mistake. Repealing both laws and providing Medicare for anybody who cannot get or reasonably afford private insurance would represent a first step in cementing their hegemony for generations like the democrats did to them in 1932.
The correct answer is so obvious. Just expand Medicare. But what they do instead leads me to believe they simply are too ideological to actually do it.
-
- Posts: 18734
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:02 pm
Re: How's that Obamacare Repeal Working Out For You?
I think I know why, and without trying to be insulting, I see the same cognitive dissonance in you. You accept & applaud an arising aristocracy, yet at the same time want something that works against their interests. The aristocracy wants to keep what they get, and giving some of their money to other citizens isn't part of that strategy.Speaker to Animals wrote:Martin Hash wrote:Once again I’ve read this $6 bil is only to subsidize the Co-pays. That would only be for people without Medicaid health in their State. For example, Street People in WA State have AppleCare which covers every cent of their healthcare whereas Poor people pay an Obamacare subsidized premium & a small Co-pay at each visit.Martin Hash wrote:I couldn’t tell what was cut? The co-pay? Can’t be the subsidy, it was only $6 billion.
The GOP is making a huge mistake. Repealing both laws and providing Medicare for anybody who cannot get or reasonably afford private insurance would represent a first step in cementing their hegemony for generations like the democrats did to them in 1932.
The correct answer is so obvious. Just expand Medicare. But what they do instead leads me to believe they simply are too ideological to actually do it.
Shamedia, Shamdemic, Shamucation, Shamlection, Shamconomy & Shamate Change