THE ERA OF TRUMP

[Martin Hash]

Ask yourself what kind of attempts would the DNC use to regain control? You know there's been multiple meetings of People-In-High-Places strategizing on how to discredit Trump's election. I would say $billions are being spent, so what is it being spent on? There's got to be a ton of fake news & misdirection going on, the only question is R U smart enough to figure out which is which?

p.s. It's a morally-corrupt place when I trust WikiLeaks more than I trust the CIA & FBI.

[Okeefenokee]

I want to make sure we are all crystal clear about what is being argued by the left here.

Is it a correct summarization to state that the democrats make the claim that Russia interfered in the election by hacking the DNC and exposing their corruption and criminal conspiracies to the electorate, thereby costing them enough votes for them to lose the election?

That's what it seems like people are upset about. We seem to have reached the point where criminals are upset they were caught red-handed and blame the hacker who exposed them. Maybe the hacking was right or wrong, but once the electorate obtained the information of all their colluding, corruption, and illegal activities, where we supposed to vote for Hillary Clinton anyway because it might have been the Russians who exposed her?

Get real.

Somebody should make a Scooby Doo meme where the bad guy is caught and unmasked, and his face is Hillary Clinton, and he says "I would have gotten away with it too if not for those damned Russians!"

I mean.. the hysterical reaction by the democratic party and MSM to these leaks makes me think the PizzaGate story actually has legs. That explains this reaction better than anything else I can come up with. It's really quite crazy.

[Okeefenokee]

I got skilz

[Speaker to Animals]

[Okeefenokee]

[Speaker to Animals]

Or put another way:

If some hacker illegally broke into private servers of a presidential candidate, and exposed the fact that the candidate is a huge pedophile, should the electorate ignore that information and elect that candidate anyway simply because the hack that exposed the candidate technically breaks the law?

If your answer is no, of course people should take into account the fact that this presidential candidate rapes children when casting a vote, then my reply to you is: where you draw the line? For people upset about the DNC hack as if it "stole" the election, the line obviously lies somewhere between the crime and corruption on display in the DNC leaks and pedophilia. I am curious where such people draw the line (if at all).

[ssu]

I want to make sure we are all crystal clear about what is being argued by the left here.

Is it a correct summarization to state that the democrats make the claim that Russia interfered in the election by hacking the DNC and exposing their corruption and criminal conspiracies to the electorate, thereby costing them enough votes for them to lose the election?

No, that's your fucking bullshit.

Why don't you read what your officials actually say and not just what somebody tells you what they intrepret them saying? The one's you think are on the leash of the evil Clintons.

Moscow’s use of disclosures during the US election was unprecedented, but its influence campaign otherwise followed a longstanding Russian messaging strategy that blends covert intelligence operations—such as cyber activity—with overt efforts by Russian Government agencies, statefunded media, third-party intermediaries, and paid social media users or “trolls.”

We assess that influence campaigns are approved at the highest levels of the Russian Government—particularly those that would be politically sensitive. Moscow’s campaign aimed at the US election reflected years of investment in its capabilities, which Moscow has honed in the former Soviet states.

By their nature, Russian influence campaigns are multifaceted and designed to be deniable because they use a mix of agents of influence, cutouts, front organizations, and false-flag operations. Moscow demonstrated this during the Ukraine crisis in 2014, when Russia deployed forces and advisers to eastern Ukraine and denied it publicly.

But you just look at the the hackings, that were part of a larger campaign, and just tell yourself it was a huge conspiracy where Hillary invented that it was the poor innocent Russians, who never did anything. You just think the election silly season is still on.

Yeah really, could have been anybody. Perhaps the Chinese. We can never know.

[Okeefenokee]

Only died in the wool Hillary supporters are upset about the leaks. And yes they would still vote for her if they found out she was a pedo. I promise they would. We're talking about democrat Hillary supporters. They went to the crossroads and made a deal, but the devil never said she'd win. Now they're losing their shit cause they sold their souls and got nothing for it.

[Martin Hash]

Only died in the wool Hillary supporters are upset about the leaks. And yes they would still vote for her if they found out she was a pedo. I promise they would. We're talking about democrat Hillary supporters. They went to the crossroads and made a deal, but the devil never said she'd win. Now they're losing their shit cause they sold their souls and got nothing for it.

Quotable shit right there.

[Kazmyr]

Only died in the wool Hillary supporters are upset about the leaks. And yes they would still vote for her if they found out she was a pedo. I promise they would. We're talking about democrat Hillary supporters. They went to the crossroads and made a deal, but the devil never said she'd win. Now they're losing their shit cause they sold their souls and got nothing for it.

First rule when dealing with the devil:

Don't.