Russia! Russia!! Russia!!!

[ssu]

Hahahahaa...

Oh, people now eagerly believe here Kim Dotcom. Now? After nearly a year? Kim Dotcom made the doofus claims LAST MAY!

Where were you guys last year?

The guy who claimed btw to have hacked Sudanese bank accounts belonging to Osama Bin Laden and offered a $10 million reward for information leading to Osama's capture on his now-defunct kimble.org site.

Yeah, funny fella.

[Fife]

22.6 MB/s

[pineapplemike]

Those were the Guccifer 2.0 leaks, are those the same as the alleged Seth Rich/Russia DNC leaks/hacks?

[pineapplemike]

I'm pretty indifferent to Kimdotcom at this point but he does raise some interesting leverage here

[Speaker to Animals]

I feel sorry for people like ssu, quite honestly. They have been apoplectic about Russia for the past year, and it turns out they had Putin's cock in their mouths this whole time.

[Fife]

22.6 MB/s, oh and BTW, have you seen the pizza menu? It seems to have gone missing, lol.

[Hastur]

SSU called it. It was Seth Rich.

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-02- ... -even-hack

How did he call it? That destroys the whole Russian narrative. His whole reason for living.

I fucking posted those facts in August and nobody gave a damn.

viewtopic.php?f=63&t=2084&p=93052&hilit=23+MB/s#p93052

[SuburbanFarmer]

SSU called it. It was Seth Rich.

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-02- ... -even-hack

How did he call it? That destroys the whole Russian narrative. His whole reason for living.

I fucking posted those facts in August and nobody gave a damn.

viewtopic.php?f=63&t=2084&p=93052&hilit=23+MB/s#p93052

I remember that, and I was interested. It was rather circumstantial, compared to someone actually claiming to be in on it, and offering to testify before Congress on the matter.

[Fife]

How A Plea Reversal From Michael Flynn Could Uncover More Federal Corruption

On Friday, Judge Emmet Sullivan issued an order in United States v. Flynn that, while widely unnoticed, reveals something fascinating: A motion by Michael Flynn to withdraw his guilty plea based on government misconduct is likely in the works.

Just a week ago, and thus before Sullivan quietly directed Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s team to provide Flynn’s attorneys “any exculpatory evidence,” Washington Examiner columnist Byron York detailed the oddities of Flynn’s case. The next day, former assistant U.S. attorney and National Review contributing editor Andrew McCarthy connected more of the questionable dots. York added even more details a couple of days later. Together these articles provide the backdrop necessary to understand the significance of Sullivan’s order on Friday.

That Brady order on Friday was sua sponte.

[C-Mag]

How A Plea Reversal From Michael Flynn Could Uncover More Federal Corruption

On Friday, Judge Emmet Sullivan issued an order in United States v. Flynn that, while widely unnoticed, reveals something fascinating: A motion by Michael Flynn to withdraw his guilty plea based on government misconduct is likely in the works.

Just a week ago, and thus before Sullivan quietly directed Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s team to provide Flynn’s attorneys “any exculpatory evidence,” Washington Examiner columnist Byron York detailed the oddities of Flynn’s case. The next day, former assistant U.S. attorney and National Review contributing editor Andrew McCarthy connected more of the questionable dots. York added even more details a couple of days later. Together these articles provide the backdrop necessary to understand the significance of Sullivan’s order on Friday.

That Brady order on Friday was sua sponte.

You say sua sponte, I say suo motu.