THE ERA OF TRUMP

[SuburbanFarmer]

REPORT
NSA Employees leaving in droves.
Applaud or Panic as is appropriate
http://thehill.com/policy/national-secu ... ent-report

Both reactions seem appropriate, actually....

[TheReal_ND]

who's going to read my shit posts now?

[StCapps]

Trump victory had little to do with his position on the issues, the clowns on this forum who think he won because of his position on immigration are projecting their own views on the electorate. Voters won't throw Trump out of office for making a deal with Democrats on DACA to sell his immigration reform package, if you think they will, you live in a bubble and have mistaken your own personal views for that of Trump's base.

Also you know when Kath isn't reaching to attack Trump for this Bannon "feud", that you've done jumped the shark for focusing on this as if it's some big issue. Get better GCF.

[Speaker to Animals]

Trump whisperer.

[StCapps]

Trump whisperer.

It's not hard to be one, just stop assuming that you are Trump's base when you are political misfit who very few Americans agree with, that would be a good start. That is what is leading your analysis astray, you think the reasons you like Trump are the same reasons as the majority of folks who voted for him, I don't hold such delusions.

I didn't vote for Trump and I don't pretend the American electorate sees him the way I do, because they don't, you should do the same.

[C-Mag]

I've always seen the Trump Election as an Anti-Establishment vote. The Establishment tried desperately to give us a Jeb Bush - Hillary Ticket.

Keep disrupting the Establishment Trump. Everyday he is in office the establishment is focused on him, not focused on forcing me under globalist laws and policies.

[DBTrek]

I don’t get this DACA thing at all. Trump is rolling it back, which should make StA happy. He also said congress has 6 months to legalize its protections or he may take unilateral action. That’s just confusing. Nowhere does any article specify what action Trump might take.

So ... is he telling congress to make it a law so he can force them to put their money where their mouth is? And since he’s repealing the protections in six months what action will he take if congress doesn’t act? The action of repealing it (which he’s already doing), or some other action?

Kudos to those who found enough information to get mad about Trump and DACA, because the sources I’ve seen make no sense whatsoever.

[SuburbanFarmer]

I don’t get this DACA thing at all. Trump is rolling it back, which should make StA happy. He also said congress has 6 months to legalize its protections or he may take unilateral action. That’s just confusing. Nowhere does any article specify what action Trump might take.

So ... is he telling congress to make it a law so he can force them to put their money where their mouth is? And since he’s repealing the protections in six months what action will he take if congress doesn’t act? The action of repealing it (which he’s already doing), or some other action?

Kudos to those who found enough information to get mad about Trump and DACA, because the sources I’ve seen make no sense whatsoever.

Just picture someone managing the country on a corporate-quarterly basis, with absolutely no long-term plan. That's how it makes sense.

[StCapps]

I don’t get this DACA thing at all. Trump is rolling it back, which should make StA happy. He also said congress has 6 months to legalize its protections or he may take unilateral action. That’s just confusing. Nowhere does any article specify what action Trump might take.

So ... is he telling congress to make it a law so he can force them to put their money where their mouth is? And since he’s repealing the protections in six months what action will he take if congress doesn’t act? The action of repealing it (which he’s already doing), or some other action?

Kudos to those who found enough information to get mad about Trump and DACA, because the sources I’ve seen make no sense whatsoever.

He's not going to repeal DACA, he is pretending to, for negotiation leverage.

That's what StA is pissed about, fuck a good immigration deal, if it's not up to his levels of ideological purity, then he'll vote Democrat next time, they'll deliver on the immigration reform StA prefers, no doubt.


Yet he wonders why Trump wouldn't be worried about losing his base if he makes a deal on DACA? It's because there is nothing to worry about, ideological purity on immigration was never a necessity for Trump's base, he's far better than the alternative, and that's all that matters to the base, not ideological purity.

[SuburbanFarmer]

I don’t get this DACA thing at all. Trump is rolling it back, which should make StA happy. He also said congress has 6 months to legalize its protections or he may take unilateral action. That’s just confusing. Nowhere does any article specify what action Trump might take.

So ... is he telling congress to make it a law so he can force them to put their money where their mouth is? And since he’s repealing the protections in six months what action will he take if congress doesn’t act? The action of repealing it (which he’s already doing), or some other action?

Kudos to those who found enough information to get mad about Trump and DACA, because the sources I’ve seen make no sense whatsoever.

He's not going to repeal DACA, he is pretending to, for negotiation leverage.

That's what StA is pissed about, fuck a good immigration deal, if it's not up to his levels of ideological purity, then he'll vote Democrat next time, they'll deliver on the immigration reform StA prefers, no doubt.


Yet he wonders why Trump wouldn't be worried about losing his base if he makes a deal on DACA? It's because there is nothing to worry about, ideological purity on immigration was never a necessity for Trump's base, he's far better than the alternative, and that's all that matters to the base, not ideological purity.

Solid point. The feelz are everything, and everything is feelz.