Trump Tower Bugged by BHO?

[Montegriffo]

I don't know if AP is fake news or not, but I enjoyed this article, so it probably is.

For fake news read critical of Trump, real news is anything that sucks Krusty's old fella or tweets from the man himself.
Hence the recent vilification of the BBC which was previously held up as an example of good information but is now considered state sponsored propaganda.

I'll start believing the BBC when they finally admit that Princess Di was killed by members of the Majestic 12 because she knew too much about Eisenhower's secret deal with the Greys (yes those Greys) to allow testing on humans.

Oh come on now, everyone knows that St Diana (patron saint of media whores and dodgy fashion choices) was killed under direct orders from Prince Philip for dating a Muslim.

[Ex-California]

THE EARTH IS FLAT

[ssu]

Trump has gone onwards to make the next accusations towards Obama. Now it's prisoners released from Gitmo that have gone to do bad things.

So I guess in the long run this topic isn't going to be around... just like the 5 million illegal voters that voted Hillary.

At least the GOP is showing signs of adapting to the new normal with the President:

(the Hill) Republicans shrug off Trump wiretap claims

President Trump over the weekend made the explosive claim that his predecessor, Barack Obama, wiretapped his phones during the 2016 campaign.

The reaction from most Republicans on Capitol Hill: a collective shrug.

Facing a make-or-break moment on ObamaCare this week, congressional Republicans are determined not to let the latest Trump Twitter tirade slow down or derail their top legislative priority: repealing the Affordable Care Act. Both Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) were all too happy to discuss their plans to gut ObamaCare but had no comment Monday on Trump’s unsubstantiated spying allegations. With little fanfare, top House investigators said they’d simply fold Trump’s new wiretap claims into their ongoing probe of Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election.

And rank-and-file Republicans writing a repeal bill insisted they wouldn’t be distracted or thrown off message by Trump’s comment of the day.
“We can walk and chew gum at the same time,” Rep. Richard Hudson (R-N.C.), a member of the Energy and Commerce Committee that is playing a critical role in drafting the repeal legislation, told The Hill.

Perhaps the new saying ought to be:

President Trump tweets, but the Caravan moves on?

[Okeefenokee]

Oh, would you look at that. No wiretapping headlines this morning. Uh oh guys. I think someone figured out how fucked they are.

[BjornP]

I don't believe that BBC is as blatantly slanted as VOA but that doesn't mean it can be objective while it is tied to a government. It can only provide the UK's side of a story. This is the way PBS is biased as well.

So, you don't believe there ever have been, are, or can be BBC shows, stories, or segments, that are critical of the British government or its policies?

[ssu]

Oh, would you look at that. No wiretapping headlines this morning. Uh oh guys. I think someone figured out how fucked they are.

Not any? And if so, that's a bit funny.

Which side figured out how fucked they are?

Or both?

Interesting to note that this mess is steered clear by McMasters and Dan Coats.

Perhaps it might be that Mattis (and the gang) just want to stay away, perhaps go on trips just like they did with Pence. And leave handling Trump to Bannon and Jared & Ivanka. It's the Whitehouse spokespersons that have to say something and they are clueless to what to say. Otherwise people just stay clear of it, if they can.

[Dand]

I don't believe that BBC is as blatantly slanted as VOA but that doesn't mean it can be objective while it is tied to a government. It can only provide the UK's side of a story. This is the way PBS is biased as well.

So, you don't believe there ever have been, are, or can be BBC shows, stories, or segments, that are critical of the British government or its policies?

No it is not that simple. It pushes the narrative that it wants to push and factions of the British government with more access to the BBC can use it to be critical of factions they dislike.


Everybody has their own narrative


BBC's headline when an Islamist suicide bomber blew himself up in Germany

[Speaker to Animals]

Oh, would you look at that. No wiretapping headlines this morning. Uh oh guys. I think someone figured out how fucked they are.

Levin is a genius. This was checkmate.

[Montegriffo]

I don't believe that BBC is as blatantly slanted as VOA but that doesn't mean it can be objective while it is tied to a government. It can only provide the UK's side of a story. This is the way PBS is biased as well.

So, you don't believe there ever have been, are, or can be BBC shows, stories, or segments, that are critical of the British government or its policies?

Don't go fogging up the issue with your Scandinavian logic or else someone is going to have to explain how come a government which has been Conservative led for 31 out of the last 38 years has allowed it's propaganda machine to become infested with Marxist bias.
The only fact you need to know is that the BBC has been critical of Trump which proves it is a fake news outlet beyond all reasonable doubt.

[Dand]

I don't believe that BBC is as blatantly slanted as VOA but that doesn't mean it can be objective while it is tied to a government. It can only provide the UK's side of a story. This is the way PBS is biased as well.

So, you don't believe there ever have been, are, or can be BBC shows, stories, or segments, that are critical of the British government or its policies?

Don't go fogging up the issue with your Scandinavian logic or else someone is going to have to explain how come a government which has been Conservative led for 31 out of the last 38 years has allowed it's propaganda machine to become infested with Marxist bias.
The only fact you need to know is that the BBC has been critical of Trump which proves it is a fake news outlet beyond all reasonable doubt.

Please refer to my most recent examples of BBC reporting, two posts above.