Brexit

[Zlaxer]

Wow - no response - lolz...no balls anymore.....

[TheReal_ND]

Just call him a natzi, Monte

[Montegriffo]

Wow - no response - lolz...no balls anymore.....

Respond to what? A load of fallacies about immigration rates?

https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulation ... rt/feb2017

Have a read and then explain how the falling rates of immigration are driving up crime figures.

Unlike the US the UK has a hard border and very few illegal immigrants. Most are from the EU.
Landlords fined for housing illegal immigrants
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... rants.html
Banks help catch illegals
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/busin ... 60526.html
police arrest illegals
http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/843504 ... orce-video

[TheReal_ND]

[Montegriffo]

That's what happens when your currency falls, your products are more attractive to overseas trade. Of course that will all come crashing down once we leave and tariffs are imposed.

[TheReal_ND]

Hannity and Carlson are no longer allowed to be broadcast in the UK because of breaches of "impartiality"

In bongspeak "impartiality" is anything that doesnt conform to the liberal democratic poz world view.

http://archive.is/32coF

Fox News is too edgy for cuck island

[Fife]

[Montegriffo]

Hannity and Carlson are no longer allowed to be broadcast in the UK because of breaches of "impartiality"

In bongspeak "impartiality" is anything that doesnt conform to the liberal democratic poz world view.

http://archive.is/32coF

Fox News is too edgy for cuck island

https://www.theguardian.com/media/2017/ ... fcom-finds

Ofcom’s ruling concluded there was “no reflection of the views of the UK government or any of the authorities or people criticised” and the presenter “did not challenge the views of his contributors; instead, he reinforced their views.”
Ofcom found the programme breached rules 5.9, 5.11 and 5.12 of the British broadcasting code. These relate to adequate representation of alternative views on discussions programmes, due impartiality on matters of major political or industrial controversy, and including a wide range of significant views when dealing with major political or industrial controversy.
The programme included criticism of Theresa May, Beverley Hughes, the deputy mayor of Manchester, and Ian Hopkins, the chief constable of Greater Manchester police, as well as the government and authorities in general.
The watchdog said of the programme: “Ofcom considered that viewers were likely to have expected the programme to comment critically on various political targets, which in this case included the UK government and UK authorities more generally. However, we considered that these contextual factors were not sufficient to remove the need for the programme to also reflect significant alternative viewpoints, and treat these with due weight.”

Not because of their views, because of their lack of balance.
Fox has no balance...who knew?

[Speaker to Animals]

1984

[Fife]