More horseshit. You're trying to convince someone that because Saddam had and used WMDs in the past, that that past use is why Iraq was invaded, which is a total fucking lie.ssu wrote:Go pedal yours.Okeefenokee wrote:
Everyone knew that. Go pedal this horseshit somewhere else.
Nothing there isn't false. Saddam Hussein had a WMD Project, and then he hadn't after two military operations.
And then the White House came up with the idea he had when preparing for a new war. CIA director
then decided to be a "team player".
Everyone knew about him gassing the Kurds, and Iranians. We didn't invade in 2003 because of something that happened in the eighties. The past use had nothing to do with the invasion. That's nothing more that your usual dishonest horseshit trying to deflect from the habitual liars in the IC that you hold so highly.
Every agency in the IC backed up the CIA's bullshit claim that Saddam was manufacturing WMD's in 2003. They didn't say Saddam posed a threat because of the Kurds. The invasion had nothing to do with the Kurds getting gassed decades before. That's just some horseshit lie you made up.
Go figure that the cheerleader for the lying IC is full of lies himself.