They wonder why we dont trust them. Media bias thread.

PartyOf5
Posts: 3657
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 11:15 am

Re: They wonder why we dont trust them. Media bias thread.

Post by PartyOf5 » Thu Oct 11, 2018 10:14 am

Racism is only funny to HM when the racists are black.

User avatar
Fife
Posts: 15157
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:47 am

Re: They wonder why we dont trust them. Media bias thread.

Post by Fife » Thu Oct 11, 2018 10:18 am

Image

User avatar
Hanarchy Montanarchy
Posts: 5991
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 1:54 am

Re: They wonder why we dont trust them. Media bias thread.

Post by Hanarchy Montanarchy » Thu Oct 11, 2018 3:54 pm

PartyOf5 wrote:
Thu Oct 11, 2018 10:14 am
Racism is only funny to HM when the racists are black.
I almost always think racism is funny.
HAIL!

Her needs America so they won't just take his shit away like in some pussy non gun totting countries can happen.
-Hwen

PartyOf5
Posts: 3657
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 11:15 am

Re: They wonder why we dont trust them. Media bias thread.

Post by PartyOf5 » Fri Oct 26, 2018 10:40 am

WI man arrested trying to buy lethal dose of radioactive substance. The man is Jermey Ryan, aka Segway boy. This is guy that has been constant protester in Madison for years. He is a known liberal who has chased Republican officials in Madison around on a Segway as he yells and screams at them. He's been arrested numerous times. Everyone who has heard of him knows he is a liberal loon. He even tried to run against Paul Ryan a couple of times as a Republican hoping he could trick voters into thinking they were voting for Paul Ryan.

Guess which piece of information the media has been emphasizing in their "reporting" of this story.

Washington Times headline: Former Paul Ryan challenger sought lethal dose of radioactive substance
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/20 ... sought-le/
A prominent Wisconsin protester who twice unsuccessfully sought the Republican nomination for House Speaker Paul Ryan’s seat has been charged with trying to buy a lethal dose of a radioactive substance online.

Ryan challenged Paul Ryan in the 2014 GOP primary and also unsuccessfully sought the nomination this year. Paul Ryan isn’t seeking re-election
Daily Beast headline: Former GOP Candidate Arrested for Attempting to Kill With ‘Radioactive Material’
The Town of Madison Police Department confirmed to The Daily Beast that the man arrested was the same Jeremy Ryan who lost the August Republican primary while running for Wisconsin’s 1st Congressional District in the House of Representatives.
Those are just a couple of examples. What makes this more sickening than how misleading these are is how coordinated and Borg-minded they are.

Here is some truth about Jeremy Ryan:
http://mediatrackers.org/2017/06/02/fiv ... remy-ryan/
According to a police report, on July 9 of this year, Ryan stood outside the capitol press room — now named the Dick Wheeler press room by legislative action — and mocked Guenther over the death of her father. Ryan sang “Wheeler is dead” over and over in a baritone voice until other reporters in the room called the police on him. (The report notes that when Guenther gave her statement to the police, she was very upset and had been crying.)

Proud of his accomplishment, Ryan has posted an edited video of himself singing “Wheeler is dead” outside the press-room door. The harassment from Ryan got so bad, Guenther eventually had to lease office space outside the capitol, meaning protesters had driven her from the press room named for her own father.

User avatar
DBTrek
Posts: 12241
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:04 pm

Re: They wonder why we dont trust them. Media bias thread.

Post by DBTrek » Fri Nov 30, 2018 9:47 am

Just some Google engineers (and a VP) discussing how to interfere with US elections to achieve their desired outcome.
"Hey varmints, don't mess with a guy that's riding a buffalo"

User avatar
pineapplemike
Posts: 4650
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:34 pm

Re: They wonder why we dont trust them. Media bias thread.

Post by pineapplemike » Fri Nov 30, 2018 10:01 am

DBTrek wrote:
Fri Nov 30, 2018 9:47 am
Just some Google engineers (and a VP) discussing how to interfere with US elections to achieve their desired outcome.
this shit is fucking gross man, few things make me more depressed than the fact that the national political discourse is so fundamentally tainted. everything is fake news.

the wikileaks emails were such a huge glimpse behind the curtian
Google head Eric Schmidt's draft strategic plan for Hillary Clinton
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/37262

From: Eric Schmidt <eschmidt@google.com>
Date: Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 1:56 PM
Subject: 2016 thoughts
To: Cheryl Mills <cheryl.mills@gmail.com>

Notes for a 2016 Democratic Campaign Eric Schmidt April 2014
...
Key is the development of a single record for a voter that aggregates all that is known about them. In 2016 smart phones will be used to identify, meet, and update profiles on the voter. A dynamic volunteer can easily speak with a voter and, with their email or other digital handle, get the voter videos and other answers to areas they care about ("the benefits of ACA to you" etc.) The scenario includes a volunteer on a walk list, encountering a potential voter, updating the records real time and deepening contact with the voter and the information we have to offer.
...
For each voter, a score is computed ranking probability of the right vote. Analytics can model demographics, social factors and many other attributes of the needed voters. Modeling will tell us what who we need to turn out and why, and studies of effectiveness will let us know what approaches work well. Machine intelligence across the data should identify the most important factors for turnout, and preference.
...
Quite a bit of software is to be developed to match digital identities with the actual voter file with high confidence. The key unit of the campaign is a "voter", and each and every record is viewable and updatable by volunteers in search of more accurate information. In the case where we can't identify the specific human, we can still have a partial digital voter id, for a person or "probable-person" with attributes that we can identify and use to target. As they respond we can eventually match to a registered voter in the main file. This digital key is eventually matched to a real person.

Zlaxer
Posts: 5377
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 5:04 am

Re: They wonder why we dont trust them. Media bias thread.

Post by Zlaxer » Fri Nov 30, 2018 10:12 am

pineapplemike wrote:
Fri Nov 30, 2018 10:01 am
DBTrek wrote:
Fri Nov 30, 2018 9:47 am
Just some Google engineers (and a VP) discussing how to interfere with US elections to achieve their desired outcome.
this shit is fucking gross man, few things make me more depressed than the fact that the national political discourse is so fundamentally tainted. everything is fake news.

the wikileaks emails were such a huge glimpse behind the curtian
Google head Eric Schmidt's draft strategic plan for Hillary Clinton
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/37262

From: Eric Schmidt <eschmidt@google.com>
Date: Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 1:56 PM
Subject: 2016 thoughts
To: Cheryl Mills <cheryl.mills@gmail.com>

Notes for a 2016 Democratic Campaign Eric Schmidt April 2014
...
Key is the development of a single record for a voter that aggregates all that is known about them. In 2016 smart phones will be used to identify, meet, and update profiles on the voter. A dynamic volunteer can easily speak with a voter and, with their email or other digital handle, get the voter videos and other answers to areas they care about ("the benefits of ACA to you" etc.) The scenario includes a volunteer on a walk list, encountering a potential voter, updating the records real time and deepening contact with the voter and the information we have to offer.
...
For each voter, a score is computed ranking probability of the right vote. Analytics can model demographics, social factors and many other attributes of the needed voters. Modeling will tell us what who we need to turn out and why, and studies of effectiveness will let us know what approaches work well. Machine intelligence across the data should identify the most important factors for turnout, and preference.
...
Quite a bit of software is to be developed to match digital identities with the actual voter file with high confidence. The key unit of the campaign is a "voter", and each and every record is viewable and updatable by volunteers in search of more accurate information. In the case where we can't identify the specific human, we can still have a partial digital voter id, for a person or "probable-person" with attributes that we can identify and use to target. As they respond we can eventually match to a registered voter in the main file. This digital key is eventually matched to a real person.
www.duckduckgo.com

Don'y use Google or Youtube.

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: They wonder why we dont trust them. Media bias thread.

Post by Speaker to Animals » Fri Nov 30, 2018 10:13 am

Better start warming up to regulation, fam.

Zlaxer
Posts: 5377
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 5:04 am

Re: They wonder why we dont trust them. Media bias thread.

Post by Zlaxer » Fri Nov 30, 2018 10:14 am

Wait till Google and FB start working with federal agencies (behind the scenes) to target non-conforming citizens.....i.e., audit conservatives....O' wait....

Zlaxer
Posts: 5377
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 5:04 am

Re: They wonder why we dont trust them. Media bias thread.

Post by Zlaxer » Fri Nov 30, 2018 10:15 am

Fucking "Google Bot" is spying on us this very moment.