Unfolding London Bridge Incident

[The Conservative]

That's Saudi Arabia.

Yeah...Bin Laden wanted to use his troops instead of US troops to push the troops back to Iraq... they would start at Saudi and work their way to Iraq, I may have misspoke about where they started, but the fact is that Osama Bin Laden was pissed off, and this is what started what became 9/11 and all shit in-between then and now.

It's cute that you are so in awe of Bin Laden that you believe he had enough ''troops'' to hold back the Iraqi army and push them out of Q8. However in the real world the best equipped army in the region (Saudi Arabia) were shitting themselves and called for the help of the US.

And? If you let him go forward and do what he wanted, and he died... we wouldn't be doing what we are now, would we? Kill two birds with one stone.

[Montegriffo]

Yeah...Bin Laden wanted to use his troops instead of US troops to push the troops back to Iraq... they would start at Saudi and work their way to Iraq, I may have misspoke about where they started, but the fact is that Osama Bin Laden was pissed off, and this is what started what became 9/11 and all shit in-between then and now.

It's cute that you are so in awe of Bin Laden that you believe he had enough ''troops'' to hold back the Iraqi army and push them out of Q8. However in the real world the best equipped army in the region (Saudi Arabia) were shitting themselves and called for the help of the US.

And? If you let him go forward and do what he wanted, and he died... we wouldn't be doing what we are now, would we? Kill two birds with one stone.

No, uncle Saddam would own a third of the worlds oil and you would be sucking up to him instead of the house of Saud.

[clubgop]

It's cute that you are so in awe of Bin Laden that you believe he had enough ''troops'' to hold back the Iraqi army and push them out of Q8. However in the real world the best equipped army in the region (Saudi Arabia) were shitting themselves and called for the help of the US.

And? If you let him go forward and do what he wanted, and he died... we wouldn't be doing what we are now, would we? Kill two birds with one stone.

No, uncle Saddam would own a third of the worlds oil and you would be sucking up to him instead of the house of Saud.

I severly doubt that. Even if we had let Saddam keep Kuwait, an invasion of Saudi Arabia would've been the end of his regime.

[The Conservative]

It's cute that you are so in awe of Bin Laden that you believe he had enough ''troops'' to hold back the Iraqi army and push them out of Q8. However in the real world the best equipped army in the region (Saudi Arabia) were shitting themselves and called for the help of the US.

And? If you let him go forward and do what he wanted, and he died... we wouldn't be doing what we are now, would we? Kill two birds with one stone.

No, uncle Saddam would own a third of the worlds oil and you would be sucking up to him instead of the house of Saud.

LOL, boy you are a fool... I honestly don't know how to respond to that naivety....

[Montegriffo]

I honestly don't know how to respond

This much is clear to all.

[The Conservative]

I honestly don't know how to respond

This much is clear to all.

To say that Saddam would still be in power, or not put under significant pressure by now would be an understatement. If we didn't attack Iraq Saddam Hussein would probably be giving his sons power now, OBL would probably be exactly where he is now, dead... for someone with that kind of personality without a direction doesn't last long.

[The Conservative]

http://nypost.com/2017/06/06/third-lond ... dentified/

Surprise Surprise...