Does anyone on this forum actually care about Syria?

[Montegriffo]

FSA may be wet paper bag fighters and didn't say they or the rjova kurds are "driving the bus", but my point is that it is ok to acknowledge that even if they wanted democracy, its ok to not want to bilaterally support them. Without feeling any social pressure to just dismiss them as jihadi fanatics like isis when they're not.

Better to let Assad rule m8. He's not even that bad tbh.

Actually he is, he's a real piece of shit who cares nothing for the lives of his own people. I get your point though, it helps no one to turn this civil war into a never ending war by proxy. The Saudis and Russians must take a lot of blame for how things have turned out and the US and her allies would do well not to get involved.

[Hanarchy Montanarchy]

Never ceases to amaze how liberals can blame the consequences of the actions of their leaders on people who haven't been in office for nearly a decade.

So, after 8 glorious years of MAGA, I can assume no one will be blaming Obama for whatever fails to be great again?

Who's Obama?

Oh, you remember... he's that affirmative action hire that created ISIS in a total vacuum.

[Speaker to Animals]

Obama, Clinton, and the CIA are to blame for this debacle. Nobody else.

[TheReal_ND]

Unfortunately even if we wanted to forget about him, he's going to keep running his mouth and the media is going to keep covering him.

[BjornP]

FSA may be wet paper bag fighters and didn't say they or the rjova kurds are "driving the bus", but my point is that it is ok to acknowledge that even if they wanted democracy, its ok to not want to bilaterally support them. Without feeling any social pressure to just dismiss them as jihadi fanatics like isis when they're not.

Better to let Assad rule m8. He's not even that bad tbh.

It's not about who is "good" or "bad". Not that i know what you base that on or *who* you think he is good *for*, do you now care about what's best for the Syrians all of a sudden? I'm arguing against the virtue-signalling of those who want to forget US didn't ally solely with jihadists against Assad.

[Hanarchy Montanarchy]

Unfortunately even if we wanted to forget about him, he's going to keep running his mouth and the media is going to keep covering him.

Well, if we've learned anything, it is that running your mouth off for media attention is how to win bigly, so I can't really fault him.

[TheReal_ND]

FSA may be wet paper bag fighters and didn't say they or the rjova kurds are "driving the bus", but my point is that it is ok to acknowledge that even if they wanted democracy, its ok to not want to bilaterally support them. Without feeling any social pressure to just dismiss them as jihadi fanatics like isis when they're not.

Better to let Assad rule m8. He's not even that bad tbh.

It's not about who is "good" or "bad". Not that i know what you base that on or *who* you think he is good *for*, do you now care about what's best for the Syrians all of a sudden? I'm arguing against the virtue-signalling of those who want to forget US didn't ally solely with jihadists against Assad.

If you're asking for my personal opinion I believe we should create a genetic virus that exterminates the entire region and we should claim it in the name of Charlemagne's Empire.

[BjornP]

Charlemagne... in the Middle East? Ooh-kaay.

[Speaker to Animals]

[Ex-California]

Better to let Assad rule m8. He's not even that bad tbh.

It's not about who is "good" or "bad". Not that i know what you base that on or *who* you think he is good *for*, do you now care about what's best for the Syrians all of a sudden? I'm arguing against the virtue-signalling of those who want to forget US didn't ally solely with jihadists against Assad.

If you're asking for my personal opinion I believe we should create a genetic virus that exterminates the entire region and we should claim it in the name of Charlemagne's Empire.

Too much chance of it mutating and wiping out everyone. Better to nuke