Trump's SCOTUS

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by Speaker to Animals » Thu Sep 27, 2018 12:53 pm

In 1988, Christine Ford tried to rape me. I have never been the same since. I cannot name the exact date or location, but I can drop a few witness names who may or may not confirm my story.

Send money.

User avatar
clubgop
Posts: 7978
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by clubgop » Thu Sep 27, 2018 12:54 pm

pineapplemike wrote:
Thu Sep 27, 2018 12:50 pm
beers will be beers
I look forward to the metoo movement become the 2nd coming of the temperance union.

Kath
Posts: 1825
Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2017 7:14 am

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by Kath » Thu Sep 27, 2018 12:56 pm

I don't like this guy, but it's Trump's choice. Instead of a he said/she said issue, we have a he cried/she cried issue.

Oy - what a hot mess. Our system is such a joke, now.

On my other forum, it's like this:

I don't care about this, remember Clinton's sexual accusers?
I don't care about Clinton, that was the past. I care about this.

Sexual allegations against team blue are immediately discarded by team blue, while the red team is outraged.
Sexual allegations against team red are immediately discarded by team red, while the blue team is outraged.
This is all I need to know - nobody actually cares about sexual assault charges, true or not, it's all about which team the charge is against. I'm so sick of it.
Why are all the Gods such vicious cunts? Where's the God of tits and wine?

PartyOf5
Posts: 3657
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 11:15 am

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by PartyOf5 » Thu Sep 27, 2018 1:08 pm

Best line I just heard:

Feinstein: Goes on about all 3 accusers,( even though this is only about the 1).
Kavanaugh: I deny them all. The Swetnik one is a Joke. It's a farce.
Feinstein: Would you like to expand on that?
Kavanaugh: No (With the most WTF tone imaginable). :clap:

PartyOf5
Posts: 3657
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 11:15 am

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by PartyOf5 » Thu Sep 27, 2018 1:51 pm

Lindsey Graham is going off!!!

Durbin tried to trick Kavanaugh into asking to stop the hearing and start an FBI investigation, the sole purpose would be to stall. Kavanaugh didn't handle it well. Then Graham stepped in. Yikes!

User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18716
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by Montegriffo » Thu Sep 27, 2018 1:54 pm

He's really not doing well under questioning. Avoiding answering direct questions, refusing to sumbit himself to an FBI investigation and talking about unrelated activities when asked about his yearbook statement.
He's losing this.
Looking like a creep.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image

PartyOf5
Posts: 3657
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 11:15 am

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by PartyOf5 » Thu Sep 27, 2018 1:59 pm

Montegriffo wrote:
Thu Sep 27, 2018 1:54 pm
He's really not doing well under questioning. Avoiding answering direct questions, refusing to sumbit himself to an FBI investigation and talking about unrelated activities when asked about his yearbook statement.
He's losing this.
Looking like a creep.
Not really. He didn't handle the FBI demand well, but the yearbook questions themselves were a joke. He answered all of them directly. Then again, you've got the red glasses on, so everything looks that way to you.

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by Speaker to Animals » Thu Sep 27, 2018 2:00 pm

The FBI have stated repeatedly that there is nothing for them to investigate, genius.

What would you have them investigate? We do not know the date or location or really any substantive details. Should they just interview everybody who lived in the state of Maryland during the year 1983??

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by Speaker to Animals » Thu Sep 27, 2018 2:03 pm

And then this bitch repeatedly refused to speak with law enforcement. I wonder why? :think:

User avatar
kybkh
Posts: 2826
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 8:33 am

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by kybkh » Thu Sep 27, 2018 2:04 pm

Kath wrote:
Thu Sep 27, 2018 12:56 pm
I don't like this guy, but it's Trump's choice. Instead of a he said/she said issue, we have a he cried/she cried issue.

Oy - what a hot mess. Our system is such a joke, now.

On my other forum, it's like this:

I don't care about this, remember Clinton's sexual accusers?
I don't care about Clinton, that was the past. I care about this.

Sexual allegations against team blue are immediately discarded by team blue, while the red team is outraged.
Sexual allegations against team red are immediately discarded by team red, while the blue team is outraged.
This is all I need to know - nobody actually cares about sexual assault charges, true or not, it's all about which team the charge is against. I'm so sick of it.
There is not a person on this board that would support a candidate who left DNA on an interns dress. If FACTS were bought forth to prove anyone guilty of a crime, Conservatives would have no problem discarding the candidate.

Hell, look at Roy Moore. In the reddest of states he was discarded on mere allegations.

What is happening here is quite obvious. The Democrat senators made it clear by sitting on the accusations until after his hearing ended.

That fact alone proves the motives of the Left are in absolute bad faith.
Last edited by kybkh on Thu Sep 27, 2018 2:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.
“I've got a phone that allows me to convene Americans from every walk of life, nonprofits, businesses, the private sector, universities to try to bring more and more Americans together around what I think is a unifying theme..." - Obama