Trump's SCOTUS
-
- Posts: 4650
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:34 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
woo this dude is coming out swinging
-
- Posts: 7978
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
If this was the plan it is brilliant. Touch her up with kid gloves so she gets a sob story but no GOP Senator looks like a bad guy, but he comes out and torches the whole circus. I think he is pulling this off.
-
- Posts: 7978
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
For a not guilty verdict not a lying charge.Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Thu Sep 27, 2018 12:16 pmThe witnesses she herself named contradict her. That is sufficient.clubgop wrote: ↑Thu Sep 27, 2018 12:11 pmI told you all, they've got nothing but it is he said, she said. No prosecutor is going to touch lying, perjury, nothing. Also this is political has been and will remain. This is not a courtroom and not a legal matter. Making this one is a neverending slog that will never result in what you think it will.
-
- Posts: 7978
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
Hold it together, dont go wobbly.
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
Oh yes it is.clubgop wrote: ↑Thu Sep 27, 2018 12:22 pmFor a not guilty verdict not a lying charge.Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Thu Sep 27, 2018 12:16 pmThe witnesses she herself named contradict her. That is sufficient.clubgop wrote: ↑Thu Sep 27, 2018 12:11 pmI told you all, they've got nothing but it is he said, she said. No prosecutor is going to touch lying, perjury, nothing. Also this is political has been and will remain. This is not a courtroom and not a legal matter. Making this one is a neverending slog that will never result in what you think it will.
-
- Posts: 3657
- Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 11:15 am
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
He started on fire but is now rambling far too long.
-
- Posts: 18716
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
Talking a lot but saying very little, he's really hitting that vodka hard as well.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
- Posts: 7978
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
That's because there is very little about any of these charges. They got nothing and your bitch ass knows it.Montegriffo wrote: ↑Thu Sep 27, 2018 12:44 pmTalking a lot but saying very little, he's really hitting that vodka hard as well.
-
- Posts: 4650
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:34 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
beers will be beers
-
- Posts: 7978
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm