A controversial Democratic operative considered a Clinton "hatchet man" wrote a second anti-Trump memo, which was presented to the FBI in October 2016 by former UK spy Christopher Steele, according to reporting by theGuardian, one day after the House Intel Committee voted to release the confidential and "shocking" FISA memo to the public.
This “second dossier” was authored by Cody Shearer, a former journalist and political activist for the Clinton White House in the 1990s. According to the Guardian, it confirms Steele’s claim that Trump was “compromised” by the Russian intelligence in 2013, during a trip to Moscow that involved “lewd acts” at a five-star hotel.
Cody Shearer cites an unnamed source within Russia's Security Service (FSB) for his claims, meaning that both anti-Trump dossiers tied to Hillary Clinton used Russian disinformation to discredit and undermine a candidate for U.S. President.
Citing a "source with knowledge of the inquiry," the Guardian reported that the FBI was “still working on” the Shearer dossier, suggesting the bureau was taking at least some of it seriously. "It raises the possibility that parts of the Steele dossier, which has been derided by Trump’s supporters, may have been corroborated by Shearer’s research, or could still be,” wrote the Guardian's Stephanie Kirchgaessner and Nick Hopkins.
was this already known? why is this only coming out now? who paid for this one? are we going to need to go through 6 months of arm wrestling to get information? did i just not read the entire article? these are all important questions
The answer to your questions is here.
This “second dossier” was authored by Cody Shearer, a former journalist and political activist for the Clinton White House in the 1990s
Christopher Steele is an intelligence professional and supposed independent party being a Brit and all but this guy is a political hatchet man. Doesn't matter what this one says it will be easily dismissed as bullshit.
The FBI Director sent 2 Sr Officials, 1 from counter intell and 1 from legal to review the memo........ they stated every in it was factually accurate. ........ but the FBI and DOJ still don't want it made public
C-Mag wrote:The FBI Director sent 2 Sr Officials, 1 from counter intell and 1 from legal to review the memo........ they stated every in it was factually accurate. ........ but the FBI and DOJ still don't want it made public
Well we obviously can't have citizens just "reading things" without proper spin, can we?
Postby The Conservative » Wed Jan 31, 2018 11:27 am
GrumpyCatFace wrote:
C-Mag wrote:The FBI Director sent 2 Sr Officials, 1 from counter intell and 1 from legal to review the memo........ they stated every in it was factually accurate. ........ but the FBI and DOJ still don't want it made public
Well we obviously can't have citizens just "reading things" without proper spin, can we?
Fuck spin, clearance... they don't want the citizenry to have facts.
