They wonder why we dont trust them. Media bias thread.
-
- Posts: 12241
- Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:04 pm
Re: They wonder why we dont trust them. Media bias thread.
One more drop in the ocean of evidence demonstrating the untrustworthiness of the MSM:
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opin ... o-withdraw
A succinct breakdown of the media/Democrat collusion to stop Kavanaugh by any means necessary.
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opin ... o-withdraw
A succinct breakdown of the media/Democrat collusion to stop Kavanaugh by any means necessary.
"Hey varmints, don't mess with a guy that's riding a buffalo"
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: They wonder why we dont trust them. Media bias thread.
They have not considered their end game at all.
Assume the man withdraws his name. Trump appoints some by else. Repeat? How many rape hoaxes do they think they have left to play?
What happens when Trump replaces Ginsberg? Another repeat?
I think they blew their was with this one.
Assume the man withdraws his name. Trump appoints some by else. Repeat? How many rape hoaxes do they think they have left to play?
What happens when Trump replaces Ginsberg? Another repeat?
I think they blew their was with this one.
-
- Posts: 12241
- Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:04 pm
Re: They wonder why we dont trust them. Media bias thread.
Maybe.
Or maybe the game of “You dare question the victim of a sex crime” has no expiration date. After all, if the norm is to assume all rape accusations are true, questioning them now or later is still tantamount to pouring acid on the gaping wounds of a rape victim.
I’d be more inclined to think it was a one-trick pony if whites weren’t still being beaten with the spectral baseball bat of slavery nearly 200 years after the fact. Especially since the vast majority of whites never owned a slave, even when it was legal - yet here we are.
/shrug
Or maybe the game of “You dare question the victim of a sex crime” has no expiration date. After all, if the norm is to assume all rape accusations are true, questioning them now or later is still tantamount to pouring acid on the gaping wounds of a rape victim.
I’d be more inclined to think it was a one-trick pony if whites weren’t still being beaten with the spectral baseball bat of slavery nearly 200 years after the fact. Especially since the vast majority of whites never owned a slave, even when it was legal - yet here we are.
/shrug
"Hey varmints, don't mess with a guy that's riding a buffalo"
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: They wonder why we dont trust them. Media bias thread.
I think they blew their wad with respect to rape hoaxes for Supreme Court picks. Nobody is going to believe the next time. I'd just burn through Kavenaugh right now and submit somebody else. What the fuck are they going to do?
They burned themselves with all the metoo rape hoaxes leading into this fight. Then they went with this bullshit.
They have to think of something different, but it's not going to have the same impact at all.
They burned themselves with all the metoo rape hoaxes leading into this fight. Then they went with this bullshit.
They have to think of something different, but it's not going to have the same impact at all.
-
- Posts: 7978
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm
Re: They wonder why we dont trust them. Media bias thread.
No, if we withdraw it makes him look guilty and you'll just signal to them that they can get away with this shit. And there is no time before the midterms for another confirmation fight. You didn't get the guy or gal you wanted, too bad, you're pot committed now. Take this, or you will get nothing at all.Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Thu Sep 20, 2018 3:31 pmI think they blew their wad with respect to rape hoaxes for Supreme Court picks. Nobody is going to believe the next time. I'd just burn through Kavenaugh right now and submit somebody else. What the fuck are they going to do?
They burned themselves with all the metoo rape hoaxes leading into this fight. Then they went with this bullshit.
They have to think of something different, but it's not going to have the same impact at all.
-
- Posts: 26035
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:23 pm
Re: They wonder why we dont trust them. Media bias thread.
Cucking never worksSpeaker to Animals wrote: ↑Thu Sep 20, 2018 3:31 pmI think they blew their wad with respect to rape hoaxes for Supreme Court picks. Nobody is going to believe the next time. I'd just burn through Kavenaugh right now and submit somebody else. What the fuck are they going to do?
They burned themselves with all the metoo rape hoaxes leading into this fight. Then they went with this bullshit.
They have to think of something different, but it's not going to have the same impact at all.
-
- Posts: 3657
- Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 11:15 am
Re: They wonder why we dont trust them. Media bias thread.
Stay classy CNN.
https://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/k ... nistration
https://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/k ... nistration
“Anti-intellectualism simply isn’t cool,” Sellers said. “Kanye West is what happens when Negros don’t read.”
Sellers’ remark prompted laughter from fellow panelist Tara Setmayer – also a CNN political commentator – who informed viewers that the derogatory remark is apparently a decades-old Chris Rock reference. CNN political commentator Scott Jennings – the only white panelist – appeared absolutely stunned at the comment and Lemon made a point to poke fun at the expression on his face.
“This is not the Kanye West of 2004,” Setmayer said. “Now all of the sudden because he’s put on a MAGA hat and he’s an attention whore like the president, he’s all of the sudden the model spokesperson. He’s the token negro of the Trump administration.”
-
- Posts: 5991
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 1:54 am
Re: They wonder why we dont trust them. Media bias thread.
The FUCK this young blood think he got on C-Note!?
HAIL!
Her needs America so they won't just take his shit away like in some pussy non gun totting countries can happen.
-Hwen
Her needs America so they won't just take his shit away like in some pussy non gun totting countries can happen.
-Hwen
-
- Posts: 2434
- Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2017 10:34 pm
Re: They wonder why we dont trust them. Media bias thread.
Now imagine those two panelists making those comments were white.PartyOf5 wrote: ↑Thu Oct 11, 2018 8:54 amStay classy CNN.
https://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/k ... nistration“Anti-intellectualism simply isn’t cool,” Sellers said. “Kanye West is what happens when Negros don’t read.”
Sellers’ remark prompted laughter from fellow panelist Tara Setmayer – also a CNN political commentator – who informed viewers that the derogatory remark is apparently a decades-old Chris Rock reference. CNN political commentator Scott Jennings – the only white panelist – appeared absolutely stunned at the comment and Lemon made a point to poke fun at the expression on his face.“This is not the Kanye West of 2004,” Setmayer said. “Now all of the sudden because he’s put on a MAGA hat and he’s an attention whore like the president, he’s all of the sudden the model spokesperson. He’s the token negro of the Trump administration.”
-
- Posts: 15157
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:47 am
Re: They wonder why we dont trust them. Media bias thread.
Hanarchy Montanarchy wrote: ↑Thu Oct 11, 2018 8:59 am
The FUCK this young blood think he got on C-Note!?
IRL racism is ugly and stupid.