Finland - No Homeless

[jediuser598]

Wow, Jedi. It’s almost like I know what I’m talking about, and everyone else has some Pavlovian, knee-jerk reaction, compelling them to rant about the sick, mentally ill, and disabled vets when I make the reasonable suggestion that the capable homeless not be given a dime.
/shrug

You play by stupid rules, thinking that rhetoric matters more than logic, and you keep insulting people all the while. The rules of the game are logic, not rhetoric. I have no qualms posting evidence that contradicts my position, but you're going around saying all liberals are fools.

[DBTrek]

You play by stupid rules, thinking that rhetoric matters more than logic, and you keep insulting people all the while. The rules of the game are logic, not rhetoric. I have no qualms posting evidence that contradicts my position, but you're going around saying all liberals are fools.

It took you a while to figure out I was right about the capable homeless. It’s just a matter of time before you figure out I’m right about liberals too.

[jediuser598]

You play by stupid rules, thinking that rhetoric matters more than logic, and you keep insulting people all the while. The rules of the game are logic, not rhetoric. I have no qualms posting evidence that contradicts my position, but you're going around saying all liberals are fools.

It took you a while to figure out I was right about the capable homeless. It’s just a matter of time before you figure out I’m right about liberals too.

Prove it. Prove all liberals over a certain age are fools.

See what you're doing right here? In that very sentence above. You're setting the narrative. It's the same trick you use over and over and over again.

Proof. Evidence. Sound reason. Go away with your rhetoric.

[DBTrek]

I prefer to continue to let the liberals provide that evidence themselves.

Good job.

[Montegriffo]

Wow, Jedi. It’s almost like I know what I’m talking about, and everyone else has some Pavlovian, knee-jerk reaction, compelling them to rant about the sick, mentally ill, and disabled vets when I make the reasonable suggestion that the capable homeless not be given a dime.
/shrug

Who gets to decide whether someone is capable or not?

[DBTrek]

Who gets to decide whether someone is capable or not?

Who gets to decide what a cat is?

[jediuser598]

I prefer to continue to let the liberals provide that evidence themselves.

Good job.

The standard response when one goes to DBtrek asking for proof. Doesn't provide any, just offers snark.

[K@th]

Who gets to decide whether someone is capable or not?

Who gets to decide what a cat is?

One of our cats self-identifies as a raccoon.

[DBTrek]

I think perhaps you've not spent time around the average conservative, who keeps telling me that God is all they need for the truth and that science is just a bunch of theories anyway (which is kind of true! lol), that they don't have any real proof to the things they say, and who teach biology classes but say that evolution is just a myth.

Ahhhh yes, the faux intellectualism that liberals embrace so they can condescend to others. Now, a smart person might recognize the manipulation at play here. A smart person might recognize that the best way to organize stupid people, is to convince them that they’re actually smart.

But how do you convince a bunch of dummies that they’re actually smart? Well, you have to find one class of people dumber than them. Then, whenever the dummies congregate or post their opinions, they can believe that they’re the top of the intellectual food chain. In their dumb minds, they’ll think “all the smart people are like me, and all the dumb ones are like the one class of people stupider than myself”.

Liberalism in a nutshell. A bunch of people barely smarter than Bronze Age cow worshippers patting themselves on the back over their intellectual advantage. Like the attendees of the special olympics lording their abilities over people in comas.

[doc_loliday]

"The science is settled."


One of my favorite quotes.